Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mantis-edu: remove duplicate RC define #22831

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MaEtUgR
Copy link
Member

@MaEtUgR MaEtUgR commented Mar 4, 2024

Solved Problem

@lyraik found this duplicate define 🧹

Copy link
Contributor

@julianoes julianoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Funny.

Also, we could just remove the whole board instead, right?

@dagar dagar merged commit 1bd65f8 into main Mar 4, 2024
90 of 92 checks passed
@dagar dagar deleted the mantis-duplicate-rc-define branch March 4, 2024 18:30
@dagar
Copy link
Member

dagar commented Mar 4, 2024

Funny.

Also, we could just remove the whole board instead, right?

I'm not sure if there's literally any chance of it being used again.

Either way we definitely need to get to a point where we don't carry board specific hacks.

#if defined(ATL_MANTIS_RC_INPUT_HACKS)

#if defined(ATL_MANTIS_RC_INPUT_HACKS)

@julianoes
Copy link
Contributor

I don't think it ever went anywhere, right? So we might as well purge it?

@MaEtUgR
Copy link
Member Author

MaEtUgR commented Apr 3, 2024

we could just remove the whole board instead, right?

It would just render the 30 drones we just set up a few weeks ago to test main incapable of testing main. That's where the attention for this pr comes from. I'd wait a bit for them to actually not get used anymore.

@julianoes
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, well I didn't know about that!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants