[16.0] base_unece + account_tax_unece: AGPL -> LGPL #172
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @astirpe, |
|
OK, no problem on my side. |
|
Thanks for your answers ! @levkar are you OK with this change ? |
|
Yes sure, we want to use it that way too. Thanks for asking. |
|
@lk-eska thanks for your support on this change |
|
/ocabot merge minor |
|
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3900693. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If all the contributors on these 2 modules agree, I propose to switch base_unece and account_tax_unece from AGPL to LGPL. This would allow some forks of localization modules, which are LGPL modules, to depend on account_tax_unece to have the fields for the unece codes on tax templates. Example of such a module: l10n_fr_oca OCA/l10n-france#423
I am the initial and main author of those 2 modules. These modules have received contributions from @astirpe @pedrobaeza and @levkar ... are you guys ok with this licence change ?