Tidy up linting #95
Merged
Tidy up linting #95
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Pydantic doesn't like Sequence being imported from there
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've removed any old linting tools that have been replaced by ruff, and re-enabled the nox/CI linter.
I decided to add the UP rule to ruff, which makes everything target the latest minimum-python version syntax. Ruff tries to add
X | Yunion syntax, but pydantic disagrees with that, so I've tagged all pydantic/patito model fields with# noqa: UP007to prevent the update on those fields.