Initialise the controller app

[AdrianDAlessandro]

Description

This PR adds a simple controller app to the repo. All it has is an index view and is linked to the current project in INSTALLED_APPS. I have tried to make as few changes as possible so that it will not have conflicts with #131 and when #113 is tackled.

The first commit is what is auto-generated by python manage.py startapp controller. So if you want to see my customisations, ignore that commit.

Fixes #114

Type of change

• Documentation (non-breaking change that adds or improves the documentation)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Optimization (non-breaking, back-end change that speeds up the code)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Breaking change (whatever its nature)

Key checklist

• All tests pass (eg. python -m pytest)
• The documentation builds and looks OK (eg. python -m sphinx -b html docs docs/build)
• Pre-commit hooks run successfully (eg. pre-commit run --all-files)

Further checks

• Code is commented, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• Tests added or an issue has been opened to tackle that in the future. (Indicate issue here: # (issue))

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6dca5bb) to head (ba75741).
Report is 32 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #132   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            5         5           
  Lines           44        44           
=========================================
  Hits            44        44           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[jamesturner246]

Looks good. 👍

Tiny tests question.

[dalonsoa]

This looks ok, however, as it is done, it seems that the current app (the process manager) is still the main app and the controller a dependent, somehow, based on the URL patterns and that the template is the one of the main app.

Possibly this is part of another PR, but I think that main should be setup as an app in parallel to the controller, with all the common templates in the root directly and the URLs symmetric, one process_manager/ and the other controller/.

[AdrianDAlessandro]

This looks ok, however, as it is done, it seems that the current app (the process manager) is still the main app and the controller a dependent, somehow, based on the URL patterns and that the template is the one of the main app.

Possibly this is part of another PR, but I think that main should be setup as an app in parallel to the controller, with all the common templates in the root directly and the URLs symmetric, one process_manager/ and the other controller/.

Yes, that is to be tackled in #113

[cc-a]

Good stuff.