Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
micromamba: bump to 2.0.1 #195371
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
micromamba: bump to 2.0.1 #195371
Changes from all commits
7fe14dc
f195425
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
Check failure on line 48 in Formula/m/micromamba.rb
GitHub Actions / Linux
`brew install --verbose --formula --build-bottle micromamba` failed on Linux!
Check failure on line 48 in Formula/m/micromamba.rb
GitHub Actions / macOS 13-arm64
`brew install --verbose --formula --build-bottle micromamba` failed on macOS Ventura (13) on Apple Silicon!
Check failure on line 48 in Formula/m/micromamba.rb
GitHub Actions / macOS 13-x86_64
`brew install --verbose --formula --build-bottle micromamba` failed on macOS Ventura (13)!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's just ship
mamba
instead if that's the binary that supports shared linkage.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't the formula be named mamba then?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure, we could do that. Though maybe we should just add a new
mamba
formula and deprecate this one.I'd have suggested a formula rename, but you've said that
micromamba
andmamba
do not expose the same interface.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm only interested in the new interface, the old "conda-compatible" one doesn't really have any reason to exist, IMO, now that conda has a (default) libmamba solver. But the micromamba interface is cleaner and using it is better in CI. I'll see if I can get any devs to comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I'm now wrong:
https://mamba.readthedocs.io/en/latest/developer_zone/changes-2.0.html
Okay, that's a breaking change, and so I think renaming to mamba and just providing mamba is likely the correct path forward.
In my defense, the docs still claim it has a different interface in several places.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can I just rename the formula in the PR? Or is there more to do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's just the same now can't we just build
mamba
and create a symlink?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, but should the formula still be renamed? Or an alias added (since both are shipped in one formula, that seems best?)?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alias is probably simpler.