Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add SearchRouter component and context to display it #48785

Merged

Conversation

Kicu
Copy link
Contributor

@Kicu Kicu commented Sep 9, 2024

Details

Done

  • Adds basic version of SearchRouter which uses a modal, and allows to submit search via ENTER key (the clickable list will come in a different PR) - it's responsible for managing the parsing of query and performing the actual search (via Navigation.navigate())
  • Adds SearchRouterInput which is responsible for displaying the input to the user (in future we plan to add autocomplete there)
  • introduces SearchContext that controls whether the router should be shown or hidden
  • Adds SearchButton to display the new router but ONLY in development (not staging or prod) - I understand that the TopBar looks weird with old and new search, but that is the easiest way to add it both for large and small screens; we don't want to display the new router to the users until it's fully done

Fixed Issues

$ #49118
$ #49119
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  • on dev use the new search button to open the Search Router
  • type in some search phrase and press ENTER
  • verify that you were navigated to search page with the typed query
  • hitting esc and clicking outside should hide Search Router

Offline tests

QA Steps

Nothing to test for QA at this point, we'll do tests once the feature is more complete

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
rec-search-android.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
rec-search-ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
rec-search-ios-web.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
rec-search-web.mp4
MacOS: Desktop

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Sep 9, 2024

@luacmartins here is a draft that I created when describing the doc, take a quick look.

CC @SzymczakJ @289Adam289

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! You guys make it look too easy 😄

src/CONST.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/SearchUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
height: variables.componentSizeNormal,
},

searchContainer: {
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kicu Kicu Sep 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I searched in all project files using IDE (webstorm) search and found no usages of this. I believe these are leftovers after some temporary old search feature which was removed.

Copy link
Contributor

@289Adam289 289Adam289 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good. Requested two small changes

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Sep 11, 2024

@289Adam289 I've fixed both suggestions, take a look

Copy link
Contributor

@289Adam289 289Adam289 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@Kicu Kicu force-pushed the kicu/search-router-initial branch 4 times, most recently from 8ed1946 to 08fd7e4 Compare September 16, 2024 07:15
@Kicu Kicu changed the title [WIP] Add initial SearchRouter component and context to display it Add initial SearchRouter component and context to display it Sep 16, 2024
@Kicu Kicu marked this pull request as ready for review September 17, 2024 10:42
@Kicu Kicu requested review from a team as code owners September 17, 2024 10:42
@Kicu Kicu changed the title Add initial SearchRouter component and context to display it Add SearchRouter component and context to display it Sep 17, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 this PR is ready for review. This is only available on dev right now

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

How much feedback do you all want from a design perspective?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

If that is the expectation then I would suggest separate PR

That would be my expectation, that the router is pre-filled with the current query that you are looking at.

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Sep 17, 2024

Just these 2 questions for now, there will be more time for full reviews of the experience once its more complete I believe.
This PR allows more developers to work in parallel.

What about overlay behind modal on wider screens? Should the search modal have the same backdrop/overlay as for ex RHP?
Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 13 27 08
VS
Screenshot 2024-09-17 at 13 26 54

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

There's no overlay planned (yet) - but we did have some slight box shadow happening around it from our mockups.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 please prioritize reviewing this issue since it unblocks others.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

ikevin127 commented Sep 17, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-mweb.webm
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-mweb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

Observation: The Cancel button only shows-up on narrow layout devices, probably that's intended but I thought I should mention it anyway in case it's not.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! Works well. I think people will report the duplicated magnifying glass as a bug. Maybe we should move that to the report header soon, so it doesn't trigger a bunch of bug reports

Screenshot 2024-09-18 at 10 52 35 AM

Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM


return (
<PressableWithoutFeedback
accessibilityLabel=""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NAB we'll need to update this

@luacmartins luacmartins merged commit 4af9a6c into Expensify:main Sep 18, 2024
20 of 21 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Sep 18, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 18, 2024

@luacmartins looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

ESlint was failing on AuthScreens, it's unrelated to this PR.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@Kicu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Kicu commented Sep 18, 2024

The failing Eslint was a new check, details: #48785 (comment)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.0.38-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/grgia in version: 9.0.38-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

value={value}
onChangeText={onChangeText}
onSubmitEditing={onSubmit}
autoFocus
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Coming from this Issue #51010, We are adding autoFocus here, but it doesn’t always work consistently on Android. To handle this, we’ve an existing prop (shouldDelayFocus) for TextInput that enables autoFocus with a delay specifically for Android #51010 (comment)

}

return (
<PressableWithoutFeedback
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI this PR missed adding a tooltip for the search button and caused this issue: #50977

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants