Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Delete field Share::evals, extract data from eval_proofs instead #674

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

ggutoski
Copy link
Contributor

@ggutoski ggutoski commented Sep 3, 2024

closes: #659

This PR:

See commit logs. This PR removes field Share::evals, which breaks backward compatibility. See also #671 (comment)

This PR does not:

Key places to review:


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (main)
  • Linked to GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design OR have an explanation in the PR that describes this work.
  • Wrote unit tests
  • Updated relevant documentation in the code
  • Added relevant changelog entries to the CHANGELOG.md of touched crates.
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the GitHub PR explorer

akonring
akonring previously approved these changes Sep 4, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@akonring akonring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nicely done. Made a few comments but overall it looks good to me.

vid/src/advz.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
vid/src/advz.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@akonring akonring left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@ggutoski ggutoski merged commit ae16b4c into main Sep 4, 2024
5 checks passed
@ggutoski ggutoski deleted the gg/659-2 branch September 4, 2024 15:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ADVZ share duplicates payload data
2 participants