Port: Add support for component properties + @ValidUuid

[sahibamittal]

Description

Adds support for component properties, similar to how project properties are supported already.

On top of being manageable via REST API, component properties are also ingested upon BOM upload.

Adds support for custom annotation @ValidUuid.

Addressed Issue

Backport change DependencyTrack/hyades#1190

Checklist

• I have read and understand the contributing guidelines
• This PR fixes a defect, and I have provided tests to verify that the fix is effective
• This PR implements an enhancement, and I have provided tests to verify that it works as intended
• This PR introduces changes to the database model, and I have updated the migration changelog accordingly
• This PR introduces new or alters existing behavior, and I have updated the documentation accordingly

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.01% (target: -1.00%)	✅ 86.14% (target: 70.00%)

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (67f45f0)	19674	16033	81.49%
Head commit (a2d622a)	19876 (+202)	16200 (+167)	81.51% (+0.01%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#712)	202	174	86.14%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

---

_{🚀 Don’t miss a bit, follow what’s new on Codacy.}

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

[nscuro]

@sahibamittal Is this intended to cover DependencyTrack/dependency-track#3590 already? There are a few more changes in that PR that are not included here.

[sahibamittal]

@sahibamittal Is this intended to cover DependencyTrack/dependency-track#3590 already? There are a few more changes in that PR that are not included here.

No I didn't check that PR, do you want me to include it in this PR? Since almost all changes are here already.

[nscuro]

I don't have a strong opinion on whether it should be included here. My main concern is that we don't skip it because @ValidUuid was already ported.

The ConstraintViolationExceptionMapper in DependencyTrack/dependency-track#3590 is important for how @ValidUuid will behave. And the format = "uuid" addition for @ApiParam method parameters are important for how the Swagger is rendered.

[sahibamittal]

I don't have a strong opinion on whether it should be included here. My main concern is that we don't skip it because @ValidUuid was already ported.

The ConstraintViolationExceptionMapper in DependencyTrack/dependency-track#3590 is important for how @ValidUuid will behave. And the format = "uuid" addition for @ApiParam method parameters are important for how the Swagger is rendered.

Yes, then I'll create a separate following PR for this change. I'll take that up now.

[nscuro]

Awesome, thank you! Then I'll merge this one.