Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for duplicate files enhancement #24

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

BCsabaEngine
Copy link
Owner

@BCsabaEngine BCsabaEngine commented Aug 19, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new configuration file for project settings, enhancing project management and code quality through automated reviews and integrations.
    • Added support for multiple linting tools to ensure higher code standards.
    • Implemented a new function to identify and log files with identical content.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced file processing by transitioning to a structured approach using a Map for better clarity and efficiency.
    • Streamlined output formatting in logging functions to remove unnecessary whitespace.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Potential bug fixes included in the updated ESLint packages.

@BCsabaEngine BCsabaEngine linked an issue Aug 19, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new configuration file, .coderabbit.yaml, standardizing project settings and enhancing code review processes through automation and integration of linting tools. Significant improvements to file handling in src/file.ts and src/index.ts enhance data retrieval and logging. Additionally, updates to package.json streamline the Svelte project's build process. Collectively, these enhancements boost project management and code quality.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Introduced a configuration file for project settings, enabling automated reviews and tool integrations.
demo/esp32/src/main.cpp Updated preprocessor directive condition from 10 to 11 for error handling in ESP32 project.
src/file.ts, src/index.ts Modified getFiles to return a Map with file contents; improved file processing and logging to utilize the new structure.
demo/svelte/package.json Updated build script to create a gzipped favicon; incremented TypeScript ESLint package versions.

Poem

🐰 In the meadow where code takes flight,
New settings sprout, oh what a delight!
Tools for linting, reviews that sing,
A gzipped favicon, let the build bells ring!
With each change, let collaboration bloom,
Together we rise, dispelling all gloom! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@BCsabaEngine BCsabaEngine self-assigned this Aug 19, 2024
coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

coderabbitai[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Aug 19, 2024
Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Aug 19, 2024
@BCsabaEngine
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
demo/esp32/src/main.cpp (1)

9-9: Inconsistency Detected in SVELTEESP32_COUNT Definition

The value of SVELTEESP32_COUNT is defined as 5 in README.md, while it is checked against 11 in demo/esp32/src/main.cpp. This inconsistency suggests a potential misalignment between the documentation and the code. Please review both the code and documentation to ensure they reflect the intended project configuration.

  • README.md: #define SVELTEESP32_COUNT 5
  • demo/esp32/src/main.cpp: #if SVELTEESP32_COUNT != 11
Analysis chain

Verify the updated file count in project configuration.

The preprocessor directive has been updated from 10 to 11. Ensure that this change aligns with the overall project requirements and that all necessary files are accounted for.

Also applies to: 43-43

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `SVELTEESP32_COUNT` in the project.

# Test: Search for the usage of `SVELTEESP32_COUNT`. Expect: Consistent usage across the project.
rg --type c 'SVELTEESP32_COUNT'

Length of output: 180


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `SVELTEESP32_COUNT` across all files in the project.

# Test: Search for the usage of `SVELTEESP32_COUNT` without restricting file type.
rg 'SVELTEESP32_COUNT'

Length of output: 201

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7515d68 and 0ae0b82.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • demo/esp32/src/main.cpp (2 hunks)
  • src/file.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/index.ts (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • .coderabbit.yaml
  • src/index.ts
Additional comments not posted (2)
src/file.ts (2)

10-21: Secure hash function usage approved.

The use of SHA-256 for detecting duplicate files is appropriate and secure. The implementation effectively identifies files with identical content.


23-42: Enhanced file handling logic approved.

The changes to getFiles improve its utility by returning file content and filtering out potential duplicates. Ensure that the change in return type is compatible with other parts of the codebase.

Verification successful

Return type change is compatible with existing usage.

The getFiles function's new return type of Map<string, Buffer> is compatible with its usage in src/index.ts, where it checks the size of the map. No further issues were found.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the return type change in `getFiles`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `getFiles`. Expect: Compatibility with new return type.
rg --type typescript 'getFiles'

Length of output: 66


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the impact of the return type change in `getFiles`.

# Test: Search for the usage of `getFiles`. Expect: Compatibility with new return type.
rg --type ts 'getFiles'

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check how the `files` variable is used in `src/index.ts` to ensure compatibility with the new return type of `getFiles`.

# Display lines around the usage of `files` in `src/index.ts`
rg --type ts -A 5 'const files = getFiles()' src/index.ts

Length of output: 192

@BCsabaEngine BCsabaEngine merged commit 4dcce65 into main Aug 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@BCsabaEngine BCsabaEngine deleted the feat/check-for-duplicated-files branch August 19, 2024 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check for duplicate files
1 participant