Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HardwareReport: features to be implemented #72

Open
2 of 3 tasks
IamPete1 opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 4 comments
Open
2 of 3 tasks

HardwareReport: features to be implemented #72

IamPete1 opened this issue Oct 26, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@IamPete1
Copy link
Member

IamPete1 commented Oct 26, 2023

Somewhere to note down all the features that we would like:

  • GPS identification (HardwareReport: Added GPS #133)
    Currently there is no way to identify the connected GPS from parameters, if using a log we can look in the MSG log and find the detection message, such as GPS 1: specified as UAVCAN1-3
  • Param changed in flight. HardwareReport: show parameter changes during log #97
  • Add OSD to minimize param options.
    There are lots of OSD parameters, they should be excluded in the minimal param output and checkboxes added to allow them to be included. This would add a OSD section here:
    image
    I'm not sure what the sub-options would be, maybe for each screen.
@SantamRC
Copy link
Contributor

SantamRC commented Mar 22, 2024

@IamPete1 Can you explain the other two features that needs to be added here. If I can contribute

@IamPete1
Copy link
Member Author

@IamPete1 Can you explain the other two features that needs to be added here. If I can contribute

I added some more detail.

@SantamRC
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @IamPete1 for the OSD parameters are we talking about such parameters?

PARM, 96586979, MSP_OSD_NCELLS, 0, 0
PARM, 96539561, OSD_TYPE, 0, 0

I found them in the flight logs, should we add these in checkboxes?

@IamPete1
Copy link
Member Author

Hey @IamPete1 for the OSD parameters are we talking about such parameters?

PARM, 96586979, MSP_OSD_NCELLS, 0, 0
PARM, 96539561, OSD_TYPE, 0, 0

I found them in the flight logs, should we add these in checkboxes?

We have hundreds of parameters for each element in each screen. I think a top level one for type and then one for each screen. you can fund them all in the full list on the wiki:
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants