Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(operator): build, release, and productization preparation #5465
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
feat(operator): build, release, and productization preparation #5465
Changes from all commits
a2132ed
cd85037
16c465d
d72bf91
2f7ada4
04bc419
75b5a2c
b37d54b
cd31cab
c9d4aae
07009ee
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are a lot of flags to enable/disable stuff when running the OLM Test, my proposal is to move the OLM test to a separate Maven sub-module and execute it in isolation.
wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think that's necessary. We have only two flags - one for ingresses and a second for OLM. If you want to separate it, let's do it in a separate PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have to keep looking up at the implementations to understand "what is enabled with which flag".
It also mixes concerns, moving to a separate sub-module makes everything cleaner and logically separated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
have a job to compare the resulting
yaml
with the expected and fail instead of automatically pushing it back.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly this step and the following can be added to
operator-build-test
and we can remove theoperator-check-install-file
jobThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The job can stay separate, it serves a specific and separate purpose.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It can for sure, but it shouldn't, the CI is already pretty heavy, and rebuilding the Operator just to run a diff is not worth it in my opinion.
Happy to ask another pair of eyes in case is necessary.