Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove maximum persistent items length for PersistentFilters #2677

Open
Tracked by #2781
rudyflores opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Tracked by #2781

Remove maximum persistent items length for PersistentFilters #2677

rudyflores opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have Technical Debt Includes Architecture, Code, Testing, Automation debt

Comments

@rudyflores
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

In Zowe Explorer we currently have a limit of 5 persistent items to be stored in the Persistent object for loading any history items such as: filters, files opened, etc.

I would like to remove this maximum and allow users to have as many as they want and to be able to to manage them in the history view if necessary (perhaps for the quick pick we could still display the last 5 instead of all since this can get cluttered).

Describe the solution you'd like

A persistent object where the length is not fixed for how many items can be stored. Maybe we could even add a timestamp to these persistent items so the user in the future can see their history items based on this week, last month, etc.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Currently there is no alternative since this length is hard coded into Zowe Explorer

Additional context

@rudyflores rudyflores added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2024
@rudyflores rudyflores self-assigned this Jan 22, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for raising this enhancement request.
The community has 90 days to vote on it.
If the enhancement receives at least 10 upvotes, it is added to our development backlog.
If it receives fewer votes, the issue is closed.

@rudyflores rudyflores added Technical Debt Includes Architecture, Code, Testing, Automation debt and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 22, 2024
@JTonda JTonda added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have and removed bug Something isn't working labels Feb 22, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for creating a bug report.
We will investigate the bug and evaluate its impact on the product.
If you haven't already, please ensure you have provided steps to reproduce the bug and as much context as possible.

Copy link

Thank you for raising this enhancement request.
The community has 90 days to vote on it.
If the enhancement receives at least 10 upvotes, it is added to our development backlog.
If it receives fewer votes, the issue is closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have Technical Debt Includes Architecture, Code, Testing, Automation debt
Projects
Status: Low Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants