-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add test for except star #237
add test for except star #237
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
see specific comments for changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now looks good for me.
@icemac please make final decission on merge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, requires PR #238 to be merged first
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure whether we actually need to support this new esoteric syntax: I've never had a need for it over all the years. But as it seems easy to support it, let's keep it.
The only additional change request I have is a change log entry.
The code looks good now. The change log entry is still requested. Maybe we have to lower the required code coverage, so the tests can pass. (Instead of waiting for #238.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eikichi18 can you please also add a changelog entry in CHANGES.rst
,
Done |
Add test for except star