Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use Option type instead of a custom store type. #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2024
Merged

Use Option type instead of a custom store type. #21

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2024

Conversation

zoj613
Copy link
Owner

@zoj613 zoj613 commented Apr 27, 2024

This simplifies differentiating if a bitgenerator
type has a stored uint32 integer or not. No need for a custom type when built-in option type encodes the information easily.

This simplifies differentiating if a bitgenerator
type has a stored uint32 integer or not. No need for
a custom type when built-in option type encodes the
information easily.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 27, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ce9d168) to head (e00b0b5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #21   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            7         7           
  Lines          204       204           
=========================================
  Hits           204       204           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@zoj613 zoj613 merged commit cb89475 into main Apr 27, 2024
6 checks passed
@zoj613 zoj613 deleted the option branch April 27, 2024 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant