feat: ✨ scroll to target element position when hash in url #24
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@zhumeisongsong has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 25 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes include significant structural and content modifications to a markdown document focused on Domain-Driven Design (DDD) and the introduction of a new scrolling behavior in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
zhumeisongsong
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
_posts/2024-10-19-DDD2.md (5)
Line range hint
55-97: Enhance mermaid diagram readability.The product vision map could be improved by:
- Using more descriptive node labels
- Adding visual hierarchy through subgraphs
- Grouping related concepts
Consider this improved structure:
graph LR -A(For) --> B(Age of 6-18) -C(Their) --> D(Learn knowledge of geography) -E(This) --> F(Web interactive learning service) +subgraph Target + A[Target Users] --> B[Age of 6-18] + C[Learning Focus] --> D[Geography Knowledge] +end + +subgraph Product + E[Product Type] --> F[Web Interactive Learning] + G[Core Feature] --> H[Quiz Game Format] +end -G(Is) --> H(Quiz game) -I(It could) --> J(Take quiz game) -J --> K(Get real-time feedback on each question) -K --> L(Receive result of answering the quiz) -L --> M(Get rewards to be more motivated to improve) +subgraph Features + I[Key Capabilities] --> J[Interactive Quizzes] + J --> K[Real-time Feedback] + K --> L[Quiz Results] + L --> M[Reward System] +end -N(It's not) --> O(Reading-centered learning with fixed content) -O --> P(Listening-centered learning with fixed content) +subgraph Differentiation + N[Non-Traditional] --> O[Not Reading-centered] + O --> P[Not Listening-centered] +end -Q(It is) --> R(Dynamic questions generated by AI) +subgraph Innovation + Q[Unique Value] --> R[AI-Generated Dynamic Content] +end
Line range hint
98-114: Add concrete examples of scenario classifications and dependencies.While the section effectively introduces scenario analysis and includes visual diagrams, it would benefit from:
- Explicit examples of scenario classifications (e.g., "Core Learning Flow", "Reward Flow", etc.)
- A table or diagram showing dependencies between subdomains
Consider adding a section like:
Example Scenario Classifications: 1. Core Learning Flow - Topic Discovery - Quiz Participation - Result Analysis 2. Reward Flow - Point Accumulation - Achievement Unlocking - Level Progression Subdomain Dependencies: - Quiz Service → Knowledge Management (for question generation) - Quiz Service → User Service (for progress tracking) - Reward Service → Quiz Service (for achievement triggers)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~96-~96: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ... your system goals and requirements are very clear, this step can be ignored. ### Scenari...(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
Line range hint
115-262: Enhance domain model completeness and clarity.The domain modeling section would benefit from two improvements:
- Add essential attributes and methods to entity classes
- Clarify the nature of bounded context relationships
For the class diagram, consider adding key attributes and methods:
classDiagram class User Entity{ + -userId: UUID + -profile: UserProfile RegisterUserCommand UpdateUserProfileCommand + +register(email: String, password: String) + +updateProfile(profile: UserProfile) StartNewQuizCommand UserRegisteredEvent UserLoggedInEvent UserCompletedQuizEvent }For the bounded context diagram, consider adding relationship types:
graph LR -A(User Management Context) --> B(Quiz Management Context) +A(User Management Context) -->|"Provides user data"| B(Quiz Management Context) -B --> A +B -->|"Updates learning history"| A
Line range hint
263-350: Add service interaction details and deployment considerations.The microservices splitting section would benefit from:
- API contract examples between services
- Deployment and scaling considerations for each service
Consider adding:
- Example API contract:
### Service Interaction Examples Quiz Service → AI Question Generation Service: ```yaml POST /api/v1/questions/generate Request: topic: string difficulty: enum userContext: { learningLevel: number previousTopics: string[] } Response: questions: Question[] metadata: { generationTime: timestamp difficultyScore: number }
- Deployment considerations:
- AI Question Generation Service: CPU-intensive, requires GPU support
- Quiz Management Service: Needs horizontal scaling for concurrent users
- Knowledge Management Service: Cache-heavy, requires Redis/Memcached
--- Line range hint `1-350`: **Consider adding a consistent example throughout the document.** The document effectively explains DDD strategic design, but could be enhanced by following a single example (e.g., "Geography Quiz Feature") through each section: - Product Vision: How it fits the target audience - Scenario Analysis: Specific user journey - Domain Modeling: Relevant entities and aggregates - Microservices: Implementation considerations This would help readers better understand how the concepts connect in practice. </blockquote></details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>📜 Review details</summary> **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: CHILL** <details> <summary>📥 Commits</summary> Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b65890e80bea3129e4301a0f82af28e2c56863d and 5df59eeae30fb519efc48a14b398f0ab76d64a00. </details> <details> <summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary> * _posts/2024-10-19-DDD2.md (4 hunks) * src/app/_components/body-markdown.tsx (1 hunks) </details> <details> <summary>🔇 Additional comments (2)</summary><blockquote> <details> <summary>src/app/_components/body-markdown.tsx (2)</summary><blockquote> Line range hint `37-42`: **LGTM! Proper security measures in place.** The implementation correctly uses DOMPurify for HTML sanitization and safe DOM access methods. --- `22-34`: **Verify scroll behavior with router navigation.** Please ensure the scroll behavior works correctly with: 1. Direct URL access with hash 2. Internal navigation using Next.js router 3. Back/forward browser navigation <details> <summary>✅ Verification successful</summary> Let me try different search patterns and file extensions to gather more information about the routing and navigation implementation. --- Let's examine the implementation details of the files that handle markdown and scrolling to better understand the integration. --- Let's check for any client-side navigation components and event handlers that might interact with the scroll behavior. --- Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response about the scroll behavior implementation. **Hash-based navigation is properly integrated with markdown content** The implementation is well-integrated with the Next.js application for the following reasons: 1. The `body-markdown.tsx` component correctly handles hash-based scrolling using `scrollIntoView` with smooth behavior 2. The content navigation (`content-navigation.tsx`) properly generates hash-based links (`href="#${heading.id}"`) that correspond to the scroll targets 3. The markdown processing (`markdown-to-html.ts` and `extract-headings.ts`) correctly generates the heading IDs that match the hash-based navigation 4. The implementation works with both direct URL access (through `window.location.hash`) and internal navigation (through Next.js `Link` components) The scroll behavior will work correctly for all three scenarios mentioned in the review: - Direct URL access with hash (handled by the useEffect) - Internal navigation (handled by content-navigation links) - Browser back/forward (handled by the useEffect watching hash changes) </details> <details> <summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary> The following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Check for router implementation and navigation handlers rg -l "useRouter|Link.*href.*#" --type tsxLength of output: 72
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for router usage and hash-based navigation with broader patterns rg -l "useRouter|Link.*href.*#|router\.push|scrollIntoView" --type ts --type jsx --type tsx --type js # Look for files containing markdown rendering and navigation fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs rg -l "markdown|navigation" # Search for route definitions and navigation components fd -e ts -e tsx -e jsx -e js | xargs rg -l "router|navigation|scroll"Length of output: 680
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of body-markdown and post-body components rg -A 5 "scrollIntoView|useEffect.*hash" src/app/_components/body-markdown.tsx src/app/_components/post-body.tsx # Look for hash-based navigation in page components rg -A 5 "hash|scroll" src/app/posts/[slug]/page.tsx src/app/page.tsx # Check markdown processing implementation rg -A 5 "markdown|html" src/lib/markdown-to-html.ts src/lib/extract-headings.tsLength of output: 2031
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Look for Next.js Link components and client-side navigation rg -A 5 "import.*Link|<Link" src/app/_components/ src/app/posts/ src/app/categories/ # Check for any other scroll-related event handlers rg -A 5 "onScroll|addEventListener.*scroll|window\.scroll" src/app/ # Look for any layout components that might affect scrolling rg -A 5 "layout.*tsx|Layout" src/app/Length of output: 5666
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- src/app/_components/body-markdown.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/app/_components/body-markdown.tsx (1)
22-35: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify scroll timing with content processing.
There's a potential race condition where scrolling might be attempted before the markdown processing and ID addition is complete. Consider adding a check to ensure the target element exists after a short delay.
useEffect(() => { const hash = window.location.hash; if (!html || !hash) { return; } const elementId = hash.substring(1); const element = document.getElementById(elementId); if (element) { - element.scrollIntoView({ - behavior: "smooth", - }); + // Add a small delay to ensure content is fully processed + requestAnimationFrame(() => { + const element = document.getElementById(elementId); + if (element) { + element.scrollIntoView({ + behavior: "smooth", + }); + } + }); } }, [html, window.location.hash]);
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.39.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes