-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 210
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test with all supported node versions #621
Conversation
node 12 is not compatible with [email protected] I think it's reasonable to cut support for Node < v18.18.0 and < v20.5.0. @aminya, thoughts? |
strategy: | ||
fail-fast: false | ||
matrix: | ||
os: | ||
# - ubuntu-22.04 | ||
- ubuntu-20.04 | ||
- windows-2022 | ||
node_version: | ||
- 18 | ||
node_version: [10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd rather only smoke test the older versions. The scripts and tests are for the developers of this repository who have a controlled environment with access to the latest tools.
So, trying to run these for such old Node versions doesn't really help.
For smoke testing, we can have a setup-node at the end of the pipeline install older node versions and just require zeromq to make sure it loads. The build and testing will be done with the latest Node.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was not expecting CI to pass on these versions - I think we're on reasonably the same page.
Can you please fill in the blanks here?
- When you develop this package, it is okay to demand Node ___ and pnpm ___. (I think 22/9 is perfectly reasonable)
- When you consume this package, we expect you to be running Node ___ with package manager ___. (I think 18 / npm, pnpm, yarn berry)
- When you consume the types of this package, we expect TypeScript ___. (I think >=4.7.4, following the lead of typescript-eslint and DefinitelyTyped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These are good questions. I'd say whatever is defined in CI, is the minimum requirement for the developers, and we aim to support as many as wide Nodejs versions as possible. However, it is not always practical.
So to find the range of Nodejs versions that can consume this project, we can add the above-mentioned smoke tests.
We already have compact tests for TypeScript:
{version: "4.x", minTarget: "es3"}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd say whatever is defined in CI, is the minimum requirement for the developers, and we aim to support as many as wide Nodejs versions as possible. However, it is not always practical.
So to find the range of Nodejs versions that can consume this project, we can add the above-mentioned smoke tests.
I'm not asking what versions can consume this library per CI - as of recently, this library was completely broken in all of its CI. I'm asking what versions should we fix existing tests and set up smoke tests for?
- I'm asking what versions, if broken, would we regard as a problem?
- Even that typings compatibility test is maybe not so clear. By setting the version to
4.x
I think that means only[email protected]
is getting checked by CI, but your intention could have been that we support typescript as far back as 4.0. What version of TypeScript do you mean to target and why?
Closing in favour of #634 |
The package nominally supports node 10 and later. Run CI with all supported node even versions.