Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #199

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Update README.md #199

merged 6 commits into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

tranquochuy645
Copy link
Contributor

@tranquochuy645 tranquochuy645 commented Dec 10, 2024

Add --remote-branch guide to README.md

#195

Checklist

  • Run npm run test
  • Run npm run lint

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@tranquochuy645 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4bb5f3 and c1d732c.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
  • src/cli/cliRun.ts (1 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request involves significant updates to the README.md file to reflect the rebranding of the project from "Repopack" to "Repomix." Key changes include an updated introduction, expanded quick start instructions, new examples in the "Prompt Examples" section, and detailed descriptions of output file formats. The command line options and configuration sections have also been enhanced for clarity. Additionally, a note on legal considerations regarding the renaming has been added, while the existing features section remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md - Updated introduction for project rebranding from "Repopack" to "Repomix."
- Expanded quick start instructions with additional commands for versioning.
- Added new examples in "Prompt Examples" for various tasks.
- Elaborated output file format descriptions with generation examples.
- Clarified command line options and flags.
- Expanded configuration section with new options for file inclusion/ignoring.
- Highlighted security check feature integration with Secretlint.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • yamadashy

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@standard-input standard-input bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues flagged.
Standard Input can make mistakes. Check important info.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

85-87: LGTM! Consider adding to Command Line Options section

The documentation for the --remote-branch option is clear and well-placed. However, for completeness, consider adding this option to the "Command Line Options" section along with other CLI options.

Add the following entry to the Command Line Options section:

 - `--remote <url>`: Process a remote Git repository
+- `--remote-branch <ref>`: Specify branch name, tag, or commit hash for remote repository
 - `--verbose`: Enable verbose logging
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 18dd4bf and e4bb5f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

85-87: Verify CLI help documentation

Let's verify that the --remote-branch option is properly implemented in the CLI help output.

✅ Verification successful

CLI documentation is consistent with implementation

The --remote-branch option is properly implemented and documented in the CLI:

  • Defined as a CLI option in src/cli/cliRun.ts with help text: "select a specific branch or commit id"
  • Used in the implementation at src/cli/actions/remoteAction.ts
  • Correctly documented in README.md example
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if --remote-branch option is documented in CLI help

# Test: Run help command and look for remote-branch option
npx repomix --help | grep -A 1 "remote-branch"

# Test: Check package.json for command registration
cat package.json | jq '.bin,.scripts' 2>/dev/null || true

Length of output: 966


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CLI implementation directly in the source code
# First, find the CLI option definitions
fd "cli|command" --type f --extension ts --exec ast-grep --pattern 'option($$$)'

# Also check for any help text or documentation in the source
rg -i "remote.?branch" --type ts

Length of output: 377

@yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

@tranquochuy645
Ah, you're right about the README!
Sorry I forgot about that. Thanks for taking care of the documentation update.

Could you also add the new options to the "Command Line Options" section?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.66%. Comparing base (18dd4bf) to head (c1d732c).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #199      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.64%   91.66%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          35       35              
  Lines        1952     1955       +3     
  Branches      439      439              
==========================================
+ Hits         1789     1792       +3     
  Misses        163      163              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@yamadashy
Copy link
Owner

@tranquochuy645
Looks good!
Merging this. Thanks again for your contribution.

@yamadashy yamadashy merged commit c53fda1 into yamadashy:main Dec 11, 2024
43 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants