-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 275
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update README.md #199
Update README.md #199
Conversation
Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow. |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@tranquochuy645 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 58 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request involves significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No issues flagged.
Standard Input can make mistakes. Check important info.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
85-87
: LGTM! Consider adding to Command Line Options sectionThe documentation for the
--remote-branch
option is clear and well-placed. However, for completeness, consider adding this option to the "Command Line Options" section along with other CLI options.Add the following entry to the Command Line Options section:
- `--remote <url>`: Process a remote Git repository +- `--remote-branch <ref>`: Specify branch name, tag, or commit hash for remote repository - `--verbose`: Enable verbose logging
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
85-87
: Verify CLI help documentation
Let's verify that the --remote-branch
option is properly implemented in the CLI help output.
✅ Verification successful
CLI documentation is consistent with implementation
The --remote-branch
option is properly implemented and documented in the CLI:
- Defined as a CLI option in
src/cli/cliRun.ts
with help text: "select a specific branch or commit id" - Used in the implementation at
src/cli/actions/remoteAction.ts
- Correctly documented in README.md example
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if --remote-branch option is documented in CLI help
# Test: Run help command and look for remote-branch option
npx repomix --help | grep -A 1 "remote-branch"
# Test: Check package.json for command registration
cat package.json | jq '.bin,.scripts' 2>/dev/null || true
Length of output: 966
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CLI implementation directly in the source code
# First, find the CLI option definitions
fd "cli|command" --type f --extension ts --exec ast-grep --pattern 'option($$$)'
# Also check for any help text or documentation in the source
rg -i "remote.?branch" --type ts
Length of output: 377
@tranquochuy645 Could you also add the new options to the "Command Line Options" section? |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #199 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 91.64% 91.66% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 35 35
Lines 1952 1955 +3
Branches 439 439
==========================================
+ Hits 1789 1792 +3
Misses 163 163 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
@tranquochuy645 |
Add --remote-branch guide to README.md
#195
Checklist
npm run test
npm run lint