Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build: Add dependency between worker and task_executor #53

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

sitaowang1998
Copy link
Collaborator

@sitaowang1998 sitaowang1998 commented Jan 14, 2025

Description

As title. Fixes #50.

Validation performed

  • GitHub workflows pass
  • Unit tests pass in dev container
  • Integration tests pass in dev container

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build configuration for spider_worker executable
    • Added build dependency on spider_task_executor
    • Maintained existing source files and link libraries for the executable

The changes ensure proper build sequencing and dependency management for the spider_worker component without modifying its core functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the src/spider/CMakeLists.txt file, specifically focusing on the spider_worker executable. The key change is the introduction of a new dependency using add_dependencies() to link spider_worker with spider_task_executor. This modification ensures that the spider_task_executor is built before the spider_worker, potentially addressing build order and initialization concerns.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/spider/CMakeLists.txt - Redefined spider_worker executable
- Added dependency on spider_task_executor
- Retained existing source files and link libraries

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix worker crash in quick-start example [#50] Dependency addition might address build-related crash, but root cause unclear without further investigation

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/spider/CMakeLists.txt (2)

88-90: Consider consolidating source definitions.

The separate target_sources commands could be consolidated by adding worker/worker.cpp to the SPIDER_WORKER_SOURCES cache variable. This would improve maintainability and follow CMake best practices.

 set(SPIDER_WORKER_SOURCES
     worker/DllLoader.hpp
     worker/DllLoader.cpp
     worker/TaskExecutor.hpp
     worker/TaskExecutor.cpp
     worker/TaskExecutorMessage.hpp
     worker/message_pipe.cpp
     worker/message_pipe.hpp
     worker/WorkerClient.hpp
     worker/WorkerClient.cpp
     utils/StopToken.hpp
+    worker/worker.cpp
     CACHE INTERNAL
     "spider worker source files"
 )

92-101: Remove redundant Boost::headers dependency.

The Boost::headers component is already available through the spider_core library dependency. Consider removing this redundant linkage to maintain clean dependency management.

 target_link_libraries(
     spider_worker
     PRIVATE
-        Boost::headers
         Boost::filesystem
         Boost::process
         Boost::program_options
         Boost::system
         spdlog::spdlog
 )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e7f7c48 and a00243c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/spider/CMakeLists.txt (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: non-storage-unit-tests (ubuntu-24.04)
  • GitHub Check: lint
  • GitHub Check: non-storage-unit-tests (ubuntu-22.04)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/spider/CMakeLists.txt (2)

91-91: LGTM! Appropriate visibility specifier used.

The PRIVATE linkage to spider_core is correct as the worker executable doesn't expose the core library's interface.


102-102: Verify the runtime relationship between worker and task executor.

The build-time dependency is established correctly. However, we should verify how this relationship is managed at runtime.

Let's check the worker's interaction with the task executor:

✅ Verification successful

Runtime relationship between worker and task executor is properly implemented

The worker correctly manages task executor processes with proper lifecycle management, IPC via pipes, and robust error handling. The build dependency aligns with the runtime relationship.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for task executor process management in worker code
rg -A 5 "spider_task_executor|TaskExecutor" src/spider/worker/

Length of output: 23098

@sitaowang1998 sitaowang1998 merged commit 2ef1a48 into y-scope:main Jan 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@sitaowang1998 sitaowang1998 deleted the worker_executor branch January 14, 2025 20:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

quick-start example crashes worker
1 participant