refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in DeserializerBufferReader.

[LinZhihao-723]

Description

This is one of the PR series trying to implement #96.
This PR fixes all clang-tidy warnings in DeserializerBufferReader.

Validation performed

• Ensure the linting workflow passed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Extended static code analysis to include two new source files in the DeserializerBufferReader module
  • Updated data copying method in try_read method using modern C++ ranges-based copy algorithm

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the lint-tasks.yml configuration and updates the DeserializerBufferReader.cpp source file. Specifically, two new source files from the ir/native directory are added to the cpp-static-check task's SRC_PATHS list. In the implementation file, the try_read method is updated to use std::ranges::copy instead of the traditional std::copy for byte copying, representing a modern C++ approach to data manipulation.

Changes

File	Change Summary
lint-tasks.yml	Added two new source files to cpp-static-check task: - DeserializerBufferReader.cpp - DeserializerBufferReader.hpp
src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/DeserializerBufferReader.cpp	Replaced std::copy with std::ranges::copy in try_read method

Possibly related issues

• Fix clang-tidy warnings for all C++ source files #96 (Fix clang-tidy warnings): The changes to add new source files to static analysis align with the broader goal of gradually resolving linting warnings across C++ source files.

Possibly related PRs

• refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in PyKeyValuePairLogEvent. #108: Similar modification to lint-tasks.yml for adding source files to static analysis
• refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in PySerializer. #110: Updates to lint-tasks.yml for expanding static analysis coverage
• refactor: Fix clang-tidy warnings in PyDeserializer. #111: Adds new source files to cpp-static-check task's SRC_PATHS

Suggested reviewers

• haiqi96

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/DeserializerBufferReader.cpp (1)

54-54: LGTM! Consider adding a comment about the range-based copy operation.

The change from std::copy to std::ranges::copy is a good modernization that improves type safety. Consider adding a brief comment explaining the byte copying operation for better maintainability.

-        std::ranges::copy(bytes_to_copy.begin(), bytes_to_copy.end(), dst_buf.begin());
+        // Copy bytes from the buffer to the destination using range-based algorithm
+        std::ranges::copy(bytes_to_copy.begin(), bytes_to_copy.end(), dst_buf.begin());

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9157dfa and 09193bc.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• lint-tasks.yml (1 hunks)
• src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/DeserializerBufferReader.cpp (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

📓 Path-based instructions (1)

src/clp_ffi_py/ir/native/DeserializerBufferReader.cpp (1)

Pattern **/*.{cpp,hpp,java,js,jsx,ts,tsx}: - Prefer false == <expression> rather than !<expression>.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: linters

🔇 Additional comments (1)

lint-tasks.yml (1)

118-119: LGTM! The files are correctly added to enable clang-tidy checks.

The paths are properly formatted and placed in alphabetical order, maintaining consistency with other entries.