Update the node bindings #737
Conversation
|
WalkthroughThe pull request includes updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)sdks/node-sdk/package.json (2)
The version increment from 0.0.27 to 0.0.28 aligns with the addition of new features (isAddressAuthorized and isInstallationAuthorized methods). Let's verify the changelog entry for this version: ✅ Verification successfulLet me analyze the changelog entries to verify the version bump. Based on the changelog and package.json analysis, I can now provide the final response: Version bump is appropriate and matches changelog The version bump from 0.0.27 to 0.0.28 is correctly documented in the changelog with the following changes:
The dependency updates are also aligned with the latest versions:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for changelog entries
# Look for changelog entries in common locations
fd -g 'CHANGELOG*' -X cat
Length of output: 28924 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the current package.json for dependencies
cat sdks/node-sdk/package.json
Length of output: 2389
The update of @xmtp/node-bindings from ^0.0.22 to ^0.0.25 needs verification since both versions are in early development (0.0.x) where breaking changes are more likely. Let's check the changes between these versions: ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about how the node-bindings package is used in the codebase to better understand potential impacts. Let's check the actual usage and imports to understand the potential impact. Update to node-bindings ^0.0.25 is safe to proceed Based on the changelog and usage analysis:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in node-bindings
# Check the package's changelog or release notes
gh release list --repo xmtp/node-bindings --limit 5
# Look for major API changes in the codebase
rg -A 5 "BREAKING CHANGE"
Length of output: 2505 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for imports and usage of @xmtp/node-bindings
rg -l "@xmtp/node-bindings"
# Look for specific usage patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'require("@xmtp/node-bindings")'
ast-grep --pattern 'from "@xmtp/node-bindings"'
# Check package-lock.json for dependency information
cat sdks/node-sdk/package-lock.json | grep -A 5 "@xmtp/node-bindings"
Length of output: 672 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check imports and usage in the identified files
rg -A 3 "@xmtp/node-bindings" sdks/node-sdk/src/
# Check the changelog for any relevant information about the version update
cat sdks/node-sdk/CHANGELOG.md
Length of output: 7533 sdks/node-sdk/src/Client.ts (1)
The implementation follows the established patterns in the codebase:
Let's verify the broader authorization context: Also applies to: 182-187 ✅ Verification successfulBased on the search results, I can now generate the final response: The authorization methods are properly implemented as pass-through methods to the inner client The implementation follows the established pattern in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for related authorization patterns and usage
# Look for other authorization-related methods
echo "Searching for authorization-related methods..."
rg -t ts "authorized|authorization" --no-filename
# Look for usage of these new methods
echo "Searching for usage of new methods..."
rg -t ts "isAddressAuthorized|isInstallationAuthorized" --no-filename
# Look for related test coverage
echo "Searching for related tests..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg "isAddressAuthorized|isInstallationAuthorized"
Length of output: 764 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the inner client implementation and related files
# Find the NodeClient implementation
echo "Looking for NodeClient implementation..."
fd -e ts "NodeClient" --exec rg -l "class.*NodeClient"
# Search for the inner client's authorization methods
echo "Searching for inner client authorization methods..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class NodeClient {
$$$
isAddressAuthorized($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Check for any authorization-related tests
echo "Checking test files..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs cat
# Look for any authorization-related interfaces or types
echo "Searching for authorization interfaces..."
rg -t ts "interface.*Authorization|type.*Authorization"
Length of output: 110930 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the node-bindings package for the implementation
# Look for the NodeClient interface or class definition
echo "Looking for NodeClient interface/class..."
rg -t ts "interface.*NodeClient|class.*NodeClient" --no-filename -A 10
# Search for authorization-related methods in node-bindings
echo "Searching for authorization methods in node-bindings..."
rg -t ts "isAddressAuthorized|isInstallationAuthorized" -A 2 --no-filename
# Check for any authorization-related tests in node-bindings
echo "Checking for authorization tests..."
fd -e test.ts -e spec.ts | xargs rg "isAddressAuthorized|isInstallationAuthorized" -A 2
# Look for any authorization-related types or interfaces
echo "Searching for authorization types..."
rg -t ts "type.*Auth|interface.*Auth" --no-filename
Length of output: 1315 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying xmtp-js-docs with
|
| Latest commit: |
349698d
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://f5fd8591.xmtp-js.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://coda-node-bindings.xmtp-js.pages.dev |
Summary by CodeRabbit
isAddressAuthorized: Checks if a specified address is authorized for a given inbox.isInstallationAuthorized: Checks if a specified installation is authorized for a given inbox.@xmtp/node-sdkpackage and its dependency on@xmtp/node-bindings.