Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove PartialEq from enum errors #641

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

37ng
Copy link
Contributor

@37ng 37ng commented Apr 10, 2024

Secondary errors will be required to implement PartialEq but it's not possible for external errors.

If we want to compare errors, we can use different approach as showed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

37ng commented Apr 10, 2024

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @37ng and the rest of your teammates on Graphite Graphite

@37ng 37ng changed the title Remove PartialEq from Errors Remove PartialEq from enum errors Apr 10, 2024
@37ng 37ng force-pushed the 04-09-remove_partialeq_from_errors branch 2 times, most recently from 26b2032 to edb01c1 Compare April 10, 2024 03:26
@37ng 37ng marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2024 03:34
@37ng 37ng requested a review from a team as a code owner April 10, 2024 03:34
insipx

This comment was marked as duplicate.

@37ng 37ng force-pushed the 04-09-remove_partialeq_from_errors branch from edb01c1 to efcddb4 Compare April 10, 2024 16:31
@37ng 37ng requested a review from insipx April 10, 2024 16:41
@37ng 37ng merged commit 3c933d7 into main Apr 10, 2024
14 checks passed
@37ng 37ng deleted the 04-09-remove_partialeq_from_errors branch April 10, 2024 17:14
Copy link
Contributor Author

37ng commented Apr 10, 2024

Merge activity

  • Apr 10, 1:14 PM EDT: @37ng merged this pull request with Graphite.

Copy link
Contributor

@neekolas neekolas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very good point. Thanks for fixing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants