Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove tumbleweed ci workflow 🔥 #333

Closed

Conversation

jonathangreen
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathangreen jonathangreen commented Oct 31, 2024

The tumbleweed CI workflow was failing because we needed to specify --non-interactive to zypper and remove the now unsupported python 3.8 version.

Based on the conversation on this PR, it has been updated to just completely drop the tumbleweed CI tests.

@agronholm
Copy link

Any idea why this workflow even exists?

@jonathangreen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nope! I'd be happy to just see it be deleted 🔥

@agronholm
Copy link

On another note, do you know any way to reach the developers, like Discord, Gitter, IRC...? There are several aspects of the project I'd like to discuss with them.

@jonathangreen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I don't. I think @jimjag is the person to talk to. I'd suggest maybe making an issue in the tracker and pinging him there.

@jimjag
Copy link
Collaborator

jimjag commented Nov 5, 2024

I agree that tumbleweed should be removed. Maybe we should just do that and close this PR

@agronholm
Copy link

agronholm commented Nov 5, 2024

Would you be open to a more comprehensive, sweeping clean-up of the test workflows? Also, how do you do releases? I have my own very nice workflow for that which you could adopt if you want to.

@jonathangreen jonathangreen changed the title Fix tumbleweed ci Remove tumbleweed ci workflow 🔥 Nov 5, 2024
@jonathangreen
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jimjag @agronholm I updated this PR to just drop this workflow.

@jimjag
Copy link
Collaborator

jimjag commented Nov 5, 2024

@agronholm Yes, as long as we are cleaning up workflows, would love to see what you have in mind.

jimjag added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
PR#333 #333
@jimjag jimjag closed this Nov 5, 2024
@agronholm
Copy link

I'll tinker with my own fork for a while. I'll open a new PR when I have something worthy of merging.

@agronholm
Copy link

One more question – do you still intend to support all these obsolete Python versions?

@agronholm
Copy link

Is there a chat forum where I could talk to you guys in real time?

@agronholm
Copy link

Tinkering with the build process turned out to be much harder than I expected. I noticed that the process involves creating both static and dynamic builds for all platforms. What's the rationale for this, and is this something you still want to keep doing?

@agronholm
Copy link

@jimjag you forgot to remove the badge in the README.

@jonathangreen jonathangreen deleted the bugfix/tumbleweed-ci branch November 14, 2024 00:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants