Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature/file based filter todo1 #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feature/file-based-filter
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Feature/file based filter todo1 #1
Changes from all commits
dd53ee5
912dec4
3c26cac
4453cdd
b6b0b30
e17af2e
08481e0
6b098e8
7d44b94
5823908
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor, but as in the TODO, we should really be quoting targets everywhere!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I also quote in other queries. But I found another problem in bazel query.
Because of the bug mentioned above I tried to use another query statement to return the middle_target_candidate.
f"filter({re.escape(candidate}$)"
but when the label starts with@
it will return empty realist... so I just remove the first @ symbol for workaround 6b098e8#diff-a1d7061df7c566a1f7656624ec608ad53dd3aff7a7789b9b6e4866a3b1616042R1016There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really appreciate your tackling. But on a quick read, I think this part could use some polish along the lines we'd discussed.
Probably also worth using subprocess.run instead of subprocess.check_output, just because of deprecation and to match the others? (Also, there's the encoding issue.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to ask if there are any other problems with the processing of paths besides subprocess.check_output? At present, I have modified these 3 calls, but I have not changed other places in the file