feat: cleanup and renaming controllers

[xedsvg]

No description provided.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to have changed the names of three functions for querying a restaurant in a data model and turned them into controller functions that can handle incoming requests from users. The changes mainly involve renaming the original function names to fit with the new naming conventions. Additional changes involve using more expressive, descriptive variable names for better readability.

One minor issue is that in the hostnameCheck function, if result is undefined, it sends back 404, which implies that the resource isn't found, which could be misleading. A better approach might be sending back 204 (no content) instead.

Overall, the code patch looks appropriate as long as there are no issues with the data models and the request handling of the endpoints works as intended.

[xedsvg]

Overall, the code patch seems to be functioning correctly. Here are some suggestions for improvement:

1. In both insert and update conditions, it's good practice to include an else block to handle unexpected operation types.

2. In the insert condition, the todo message suggesting that a function should be created to remove duplicate code is appropriate. This would improve readability and reduce potential bugs if this functionality is used in multiple places.

3. In the update condition, it might be better to use the updated document rather than retrieving it from the database again with Orders.findById(mongoEvent.documentKey._id). This could save a significant performance cost in situations where there are many updates.

4. It may be beneficial to include error handling code to gracefully handle database and socket connection errors.

5. The lack of a newline at the end of the file may cause issues in some text editors. Adding a newline at the end of the file can avoid potential problems.

[xedsvg]

This code patch is a listener function that reacts to events happening in a Mongo database. The function reacts to two events: new tab creation and existing tab updates.

For new tab creation, the function sends a delayed request to open a new tab in a specific room over socket.io.

For existing tab updates, the function checks whether the callWaiter or status properties have changed to called and closed respectively. For a change in callWaiter, the function emits wait staff notification to the same room the new tab event was emitted earlier. When the status property changes to closed, the function emits an event to both the owner's room and the tab-specific room signaling that the tab has been closed.

The code logic appears solid without any obvious bugs being present. One minor suggestion would be to ensure that the indentation throughout the code is uniform to assist with code readability.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to be improving the existing code. Here are some observations:

• The indentation style is inconsistent and may confuse developers.
• The try-catch block is added when calling the Restaurants.findById() method, which is a good practice to handle errors that could occur while querying the database.
• A check is added to see if the restaurant exists before proceeding with further operations. This is a good approach for avoiding null or undefined errors.
• The owner/client logs and room joins seem to be implemented correctly, considering the current use case. However, proper authentication for the owner should be implemented in the future.
• In the else section, deleting unnecessary query params from socket handshake is being done, which is okay as it helps avoid leaking sensitive information.
• Overall, there don't seem to be any bug risks at the moment. However, depending on how this code will be used, there are still areas that can be improved.

[xedsvg]

Based on the provided code patch, there do not appear to be any significant bug risks or improvement suggestions.

The only change made to the code is the adjustment of indentation and spacing for the log message. The function simply logs a message when a client disconnects.

However, it's worth noting that the line "+\n" (no newline at end of file) could cause issues with some systems that expect a newline character at the end of files. Including a newline character after the closing curly brace could help prevent these issues.

[xedsvg]

From the code patch provided, it seems like a very minor change that replaces double quotes with single quotes and adds (or removes) a newline at the end of the file. There don't appear to be any major bug risks or improvement suggestions that can be made apart from one potential issue:

• The code may not conform to an existing code style guide, which could impact readability and maintainability.

Some teams have set guidelines on how to format and style their code, for instance using semicolons instead of relying on Automatic Semicolon Insertion (ASI), spaces or tabs for indentation, single or double quotes for strings, or requiring a certain number of blank lines between functions. It's important to follow the coding standards established by the team, the organization, or the open source project so that everyone can read and edit the code without confusion or frustration.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to be a minor change in code formatting, changing double quotes to single quotes and adding whitespace. Therefore there are no observable bug risks.

There is a small improvement suggestion to add a safety check before accessing the table object properties to avoid any potential runtime errors due to undefined values. The check can be added like this:

const table = await Tables.findById(tableId);
if (table && table.pin === pin) {
  socket.emit('tableLockStatus', {});
} else {
  socket.emit('tableLockStatus', { error: 'Invalid pin or tableId' });
}

It's also recommended to have a new line at the end of the file, but this can be considered a personal preference.

[xedsvg]

This code patch seems to be a refactoring of an existing module where some functions have been added, some removed, and some renamed.

Bug risks or improvements may depend on the specific use case of this module and the wider system. Some suggestions for improvement are:

• Ensure that all renamed functions are being used correctly throughout the system.
• Consider adding JSDoc comments to each function to document their purpose, parameters, and return values.
• Keep the naming of functions aligned with their intended functionality and group related functions together to make it easier for developers to understand and use this module.
• Ensure that the public interface of the module remains stable and backward compatible for any users that might consume it.
• Remove the "No newline at end of file" message to prevent any issues that might arise due to the lack of a new line at the file's end.

Overall, this code patch appears to reorganize and clean up the existing code without introducing any obvious bugs or vulnerabilities.

[xedsvg]

This code patch seems to be a module that exports the getProducts function. The function retrieves products and variations from a database based on the given restaurantId.

It appears to be using the Mongoose library for MongoDB. However, there are no apparent bug risks in the code.

One possible suggestion for improvement could be to add some error handling in case the query fails or if the restaurantId parameter is missing or invalid. Another suggestion might be to limit the amount of data returned by default or with an optional limit parameter.

[xedsvg]

The code patch is a refactoring of an existing module that exports three functions to retrieve restaurant data based on different parameters, namely ID, name and hostname.

The changes made in the patch seem reasonable and do not introduce any obvious bugs or risks. The variable names are clear and the formatting is consistent throughout the file.

One minor suggestion for improvement could be to add some error handling in case the Restaurants.findOne() method returns nothing or throws an error. This could involve either wrapping the function calls in try/catch blocks or using Promise rejections.

Overall, this is a good example of clean code refactoring that improves readability and maintainability without introducing new problems.

[xedsvg]

The code patch looks mostly syntactically correct with a few style changes. Here are my observations and suggestions:

Observations:

• The code seems to be implementing a database transaction to close a table and its associated tabs.
• mongoose library is being used to handle the database operations.
• A try-catch block is being used to handle any errors while performing the transaction.
• console.log is being used for logging errors.

Suggestions:

• The indentation of the code seems inconsistent. It is recommended to choose one style and stick with it throughout the codebase.
• There doesn't seem to be any reason to reassign the session variable, so the first implementation could be used instead.
• It is a good practice to have more descriptive error messages other than just "Transaction aborted" in case of errors or exceptions.
• Instead of logging errors using console.log, use a proper logger utility like winston or morgan.
• Make sure that all variables and functions have consistent naming and follow a clear and easy-to-understand convention.

Overall, the code patch appears to be functional and does not contain any apparent bug risks.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to be a set of functions related to managing restaurant tabs. Here are some suggestions based on the code:

1. It is good practice to declare const mongoose = require('mongoose'); at the beginning of the file, since it is used in multiple functions.

2. The getTab function is improved by first checking if the tab exists and then proceeding to populate its orders. This will avoid unnecessary database queries.

3. In the closeTab, clearWaiterRequested, waiterRequested, and paymentRequested functions, it is important to validate that the tab exists before modifying it. Otherwise, errors may occur.

4. The waiterRequested function could also include a check for whether the table has already requested payment or not.

5. Finally, it is recommended to use more descriptive variable names. For example, instead of tab use currentTab, or similar. This will make it easier to read and maintain the code.

Overall, the code looks clean, and adding error handling is essential when dealing with databases.

[xedsvg]

The code changes appear to be mostly formatting related, with indentation and white space adjustments. There do not seem to be any functional changes.

As for potential improvements, one suggestion could be to add error handling to the MongoClient.connect() method call in the init(clientUrl) function. Additionally, it may be useful to consider adding a way to unsubscribe from collections if necessary, as currently collections are added to the collections array but there is no way to remove them.

[xedsvg]

This code patch seems to change the formatting of some parts of the code, but it doesn't introduce any bug risks or significant improvements. The changes seem to be primarily whitespace changes and alterations to single quotes vs double quotes in string literals for consistency.

One minor suggestion could be to ensure that consistent indentation is used throughout the file (the example above has a mix of tab and spaces for indentation). It may also be a good idea to add error handling logic around the database connection to handle potential errors and prevent unexpected behavior.

[xedsvg]

This code patch seems fine and there are no obvious bug risks or improvement suggestions. The changes mostly involve modifying the importing of modules to use single quotes instead of double quotes, which is a matter of style preference. Additionally, there are some slight formatting changes made to improve the code's readability.

[xedsvg]

Overall, the code patch looks good and well-formatted. Here are some suggestions for improvement:

1. It's a good practice to maintain the consistency of single/double quotes usage. You can choose either single or double quotes and use them consistently throughout your code.

2. In line with the above suggestion, make sure you update all instances of quotes in the code when changing them, including quotes used in objects like directives.

3. On line 29 of the code patch, the filter function inside the compression middleware currently does not apply any filter to the responses. Consider refining the function to selectively compress specific response types only, to further optimize the application's performance.

4. On lines 48-51, consider defining error-handling middleware to catch and handle CORS rejection errors in the application instead of simply printing an error message to the console.

5. On lines 64-66, it might be beneficial to remove require.cache[require.resolve('../../cors.json')] or reduce its interval time if loading and reloading CORS configurations excessively affects your application's performance or I/O operations.

6. Consider adding more comments that help explain the purpose and functions of each part of the code. This will enhance readability and understanding, making the code more maintainable over time.

7. Lastly, add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to common practice and avoid issues with version control tools.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to be a refactoring of the existing codebase. It changes the naming convention of functions and endpoints, which is a good practice for code readability and maintainability. The following improvements can be suggested:

1. The imports can further be simplified by destructuring the "express" module.

2. The endpoint names seem ambiguous, it's better to use descriptive names for endpoints that clearly describe the functionality.

3. It can add more comments to describe the purpose of each function or endpoint.

Other than these improvements, the code patch seems to be correct and not introducing any bug risks.

[xedsvg]

This code patch replaces the existing route functions with new controllers in the ownerController. The changes seem to be mostly cosmetic replacing single-quotes with double-quotes and renaming function names to use "Controller" suffix.

From this code patch, it is not possible to determine if there are any bugs or risks that could cause issues at runtime. However, it would be useful to inspect the new functions in ownerController for potential coding mistakes. Overall, it seems like a reasonable update to improve consistency and readability.

[xedsvg]

This code patch appears to be updating the format of a Node.js Express router. The changes involve switching single quotes for string literals instead of double quotes. Although this change is not strictly necessary, it is a common convention in Node.js programming. Additionally, the route path in the router.get method is modified to use single quotes. This change helps maintain consistency throughout the codebase. The function itself looks correct, sending back a status code 200 when a request is made to the given GET route.

Overall, I do not see any bug risks or major issues with this code patch. It seems like a straightforward and safe update to the existing codebase.

[xedsvg]

The code changes seem fine, with some improvements and bug fixes. The following are the major changes:

1. Renamed the imported controller functions to explicitly include the word "Controller" for clarity.
2. Added a conditional GET route for getRandomTable to only expose it in development environments and not in production since it is potentially unsuitable for use in live applications.
3. Added a new getTableStatusController function and corresponding GET route to fetch the current status of a table, which should improve overall functionality of the application.
4. Corrected an error in the renaming of payCard and payCash, which were accidentally swapped.
5. Standardized the string quotation marks to use single quotes throughout.

Overall, the changes appear safe and useful, with attention paid to security issues and naming conventions.

[xedsvg]

There are some improvements that could be made to this code patch, and a potential bug risk:

1. Bug risk: The fs module is no longer being used, but it was not removed from the require statement on line 1.
2. Improvement suggestion: Instead of checking if process.env.KEY and process.env.CERT exist separately, we can combine them into one check. Furthermore, once we've determined that they don't exist, we should exit immediately instead of continuing execution with undefined variables.
3. Improvement suggestion: The interval being set in lines 25-29 should have its duration defined as a constant instead of being hard-coded.
4. Improvement suggestion: Instead of creating the server on just the 'tabley.app' domain, we should add support for multiple domains ('order.rocknrolla.ro', in this case) by using the server.addContext() method.

Other than that, the code seems fine.

[xedsvg]

This code patch looks fine. It updates the URL protocol from "http" to "https" when the script is loaded from a non-localhost domain. This is a good practice as it ensures secure communication over the network.

However, one thing that can be improved is to separate the baseUrl into a configuration file, which can be changed easily without modifying the source code. Additionally, this patch assumes that the API endpoints are located at "/api". If the API endpoints are located at a different location, this variable should be updated accordingly.

[xedsvg]

In the code patch, a try-catch block is added to handle errors when scanning a QR code. If a valid tableId is found in the URL, it will call the getTableInfo function from the state.api object to get table data using await, and subsequently update the state object with the retrieved table information and table ID.

There are two alert messages that pop up if errors occur during QR code scanning. The first alert pops up if the provided tableData is undefined or falsy, indicating an invalid QR scan. The second alert message appears if an error occurs during the try-catch block.

One improvement suggestion would be to include error messages in the alert() calls so the user receives more specific feedback about what went wrong. Additionally, since the console.log() statement only outputs the error object, it may be beneficial to provide more meaningful information in the console output with a descriptive message or log level.

As for potential bugs, it is unclear whether state.restaurantId has been previously declared, as it is used on line 103 without being initialized. Also, since getTableInfo is an asynchronous function, there is a risk of race conditions or missing updates if other components access the state object before the getTableInfo call completes.

[xedsvg]

The code patch is an event handler that listens to MongoDB change stream events and emits order updates to owner and table rooms via socket.io. Here are some improvement suggestions and bug risks to consider:

1. Improve function organization: The duplicate code comment suggests a potential refactoring opportunity to extract a reusable function for retrieving orders. It would be good to separate this functionality into a standalone controller or service.

2. Use consistent quotes: The code mixes single- and double-quotes for string literals. It's better to pick one style and use it consistently throughout the codebase.

3. Add error handling: The code does not include any error handling logic. It's important to handle errors that may occur during database operations to prevent unexpected crashes and provide better feedback to end-users.

4. Avoid magic strings: The code relies on hard-coded strings such as "insert" and "update" to determine the operation type. It would be better to define constants or enums to minimize the risk of typos and make the code more readable.

5. Potential bug risk: In the update case, the code retrieves the updated order using mongoEvent.documentKey._id, which assumes that the _id field is present in the change stream event. If this assumption is incorrect, the code will fail.

6. Consider using async/await: The format of the code is currently using callbacks with exec(). Async/await could simplify the code and make it easier to read.

7. Logging improvements: Consider adding more context to the log messages, such as the event type (i.e., insert or update), to make it clearer what actions are being performed. Also, ensure consistent capitalization of log messages.

8. Overall readability: Consider improving the formatting of the code as there are inconsistencies in indentations and spacing that can affect readability. Additionally, there are some unnecessary comments and commented-out code that can be removed.

9. Potential performance optimization: The code currently populates the items and tabId fields of the order object in both the insert and update cases. It may be possible to optimize performance by selectively populating only the necessary fields based on the operation type to reduce the amount of data retrieved from the database.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to be functional with no syntax errors. However, there are a few improvements that could be made:

1. Code formatting - using consistent indentation and adding a newline at the end of the file would make the code more readable.

2. Use strict equality operator (===) when comparing with a string rather than the loose equality operator (==).

3. Add error handling - it's important to handle any error that may occur during the execution of the function.

4. Consider refactoring the code - depending on the size or complexity of the application, separating the different functionality within this event listener into separate methods could make the code more modular, easier to test, and maintain.

[xedsvg]

The code review reveals the following points:

• In the getRandomTable function, it may not be sufficient to just randomly fetch a table for the given restaurant without checking if the table is available. A better approach would be to fetch all available tables and then randomly select one from the list.
• The getTable function could benefit from a refactoring where checks for table availability and pin verification are separated into their own functions to promote better readability and easier testing.
• In the closeTable function, there could be an additional check to verify that the current tab for the table being closed is not empty before adding it to the older tabs array.
• The populateTableData function helps to load the table's pertinent data alongside its relevant dependencies. Still, the use of execPopulate() is unnecessary since it defaults to returning a Promise when called.

Furthermore, the author has provided a TODO note to merge the getTableById function with getTable.

Overall, the code seems to be well structured, easy to read and comprehensive in the context of the application, providing good coverage of the necessary CRUD operations on Tables models.

[xedsvg]

The code changes look good and do not have any obvious bugs or risks. Here are a few suggestions for improvement:

1. Add error handling - The current code does not handle any errors that might occur during the initiation of the MongoClient or while subscribing to a collection. It would be helpful to add appropriate error handling logic to catch any errors that might arise.

2. Use consistent indentation - The code uses a mixture of spaces and tabs for indentation, which may make it hard to read. It would be better to use one or the other consistently throughout the code.

3. Ensure correct database name - In the subscribeToCollection method, the MongoDB database name is hard-coded as 'tabley'. It is important to ensure that this is the correct name for your specific application.

Overall, the changes seem to improve readability and organization of the code.

[xedsvg]

This code patch is a formatting change to the module.exports object. The only changes made were to switch the quotes around the import paths from double to single quotes, and to align the function names with their corresponding properties.

There are no bug risks introduced by this change, but it does make the code formatting more consistent and easier to read.

[xedsvg]

This code patch includes changes to a Node.js server application that creates a socket.io server to handle real-time communication between the server and clients. Here are some observations:

• The code removes the "fs" module import, which is not used in the current implementation.
• The code checks if the app is running in production mode and whether the required SSL/TLS key and certificate are present via environment variables. If these are missing, the script logs an error and exits with status code 1. This check helps ensure secure communication for the server.
• The code reloads the "cors.json" file every minute to refresh the allowed origins list (origins). This allows updates to take effect without stopping the server.
• The code adds HTTPS context using the addContext() method if the app is running in production mode and listens on port 443 by default. This helps support secure connections for multiple domains and subdomains. The options for adding context are retrieved from environment variables as well.
• The code initializes the socket.io server with CORS settings (including the allowed origins list) and adds a listener to handle client events (createSocketHandler()).
• The code connects to MongoDB and sets up a watcher to detect changes in the collections, then starts listening on the specified port. Any errors encountered during initialization of these components are logged.

This review found no issues with the code. However, it would be better to terminate the script properly by calling process.exit(1); instead of throwing an uncaught exception if running in development or test environments where this code might be running in an automated way.

[xedsvg]

Based on the provided code patch, here are some observations:

1. A new dependency eslint has been added under devDependencies. It's a good practice to have linting tools like eslint in the development environment to ensure consistent coding standards and catch common bugs early in the development cycle.

2. Two new dependencies, prettier and eslint-config-prettier, have been added. These are useful in ensuring consistent code formatting across the codebase.

3. Similarly, eslint-plugin-prettier has also been added. This allows you to integrate prettier into eslint so that you can catch and fix formatting issues within your eslint workflow.

4. Another new dependency, prometheus-remote-write, is used for monitoring purposes.

5. Overall, there are no apparent bug risks. However, it's always a good idea to thoroughly test the application after making any changes to ensure everything still works as expected.

[xedsvg]

Hello! How can I assist you today?

[xedsvg]

The code patch updates the "start" and "web" scripts in the package.json file to include the command "nvm use 16" before running "expo start" or "expo start --web". This ensures that Node.js version 16 is used for these commands.

Overall, this code patch seems fine, but there are a couple of things to consider:

1. Using "nvm use" inside scripts can be problematic if the user doesn't have NVM installed or hasn't set up a default Node.js version. A more robust approach would be to specify the Node.js version directly in the "engines" field of the package.json file.

2. If the project is being developed on multiple machines with different Node.js versions, it might be better to specify the Node.js version required for the project as a whole, rather than just for the "start" and "web" scripts.

[xedsvg]

The code patch modifies the behavior of a component's render method. It conditionally renders a button labeled "Owner view" only when developerMode is true and user is "customer" and currentView is "scan". Pressing this button changes the user state to "owner".

A possible bug risk is that directly mutating the state with state.user = "owner" without using the appropriate React state updates may result in unexpected behaviors like not properly re-rendering the component.

An improvement suggestion could be to replace the direct state mutation with a state update function, for example, setState({user: "owner"}), assuming that state is the state object and setState is the function to update it.

[xedsvg]

The code patch disables several ESLint rules, which might make it harder to catch common coding mistakes or best practices violations.

Regarding the composeItemsFromVariations function, some things to note are:

• It has a good descriptive name that explains what it does.
• It makes changes to the input order object, which could be surprising for other parts of the codebase. A better approach would be to clone the input object and return a new, updated one.
• The function has several nested loops, which can decrease performance if the input data is large. Consider optimizing or refactoring if this becomes an issue.
• The code that updates existingItem.cartQty looks duplicated and could be extracted into its own function.

In the Order component:

• The code calls the composeItemsFromVariations function instead of making changes to a duplicate of the input order.
• There's duplicated code inside the .map() method calls for product and recipe items that could be refactored.
• This component also lacks proper error handling, which could lead to unexpected behavior if passed invalid data.

Overall, suggestions for improvement include:

• Instead of disabling ESLint rules, fix any issues they're warning about.
• Use a functional style instead of modifying input parameters in-place, as it is easier to reason about and avoids unexpected side-effects.
• Move duplicated code into their own functions to improve maintainability.
• Consider adding more structured error handling.

[xedsvg]

It looks like there was a redundant color prop in the first Text component that has been removed, which is a good improvement. However, in the second Text component, the color prop is still set to "text.light" despite the comment removal of the previous "darkText" property. This may or may not be intentional, depending on the design requirements.

Other than the issue with the color prop, the code patch seems to be fine.

[xedsvg]

The code patch looks good.

Two improvements that could be suggested:

1. Sorting the categories array in place using Array.prototype.sort() method; no need to create a deep copy of the categories array using JSON.stringify() and then parse it with JSON.parse(). This is more efficient.

2. Using Object destructuring, const state = globalState(); could be replaced with const {categories, category} = globalState(); since only 'categories' and 'category' properties are used from the 'state' object. This is more concise.

[xedsvg]

The code patch includes additions and modifications to the QrScan() function. Here are some highlights:

1. The code attempts to extract a table ID from a URL path in order to retrieve information about the table using an API, then navigates to a table handler if successful. An error is displayed if the QR code URL is not valid.

   Improvement suggestion: In production environments, it can be beneficial to log errors server-side rather than client-side for better security, tracking, and analysis.

2. When a QR code cannot be parsed as a URL, the code attempts to parse it as a table ID and retrieve information about the table using an API.

3. The goToTableHandler() function creates a socket connection to listen for new orders on the selected table and adds them to the component's state when received.

Overall, the code appears to be functional. However, there is a potential bug risk with the statement if (tableData) inside the try block of the first code block; it assumes that tableData is truthy if the value is returned by the API, which may not be the case if an error is encountered. A more robust approach would be to check for specific properties or error messages in the response to ensure that the data received is valid.

[xedsvg]

The code change looks fine to me. The only improvement suggestion I would make is to consider adding more code comments to increase code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the purpose of each line of code.

[xedsvg]

The code patch seems to be a complete replacement of a previous implementation with the same exported function createApp, so it's difficult to judge its correctness in context, but I can provide some feedback on the changes made:

• Added the module express-basic-auth which can help restrict access to certain routes based on basic authentication credentials. This is a good security measure to add if the application needs to restrict access to certain parts of the API.
• Added imgSrc content security policy directive to helmet, which allows loading images from specified sources only. This helps mitigate XSS attacks using malicious images.
• Added middleware for serving files under certain routes, each with empty req.url:
  • By specifying an empty URL segment after @ in the route, it should allow for serving the frontend for a restaurant without needing access to the restaurant's username and password. However, there is no explanation of where :random comes from, so it's unclear how this path is meant to work.
  • Specifying /join as the route will serve the frontend for joining a restaurant.
  • All other paths will serve the main frontend.
• Changed the compression middleware's filter function to use a fat arrow function, removing the need to specify the req and res parameters.
• Simplified the cors middleware's origin function, also using a fat arrow function, removing the need to pass the callback parameter by name.
• Moved express.json(), app.use("/", express.static(frontendFilesPath)) and the return statement to the end of the function, likely to avoid middleware execution order issues or potential overrides; this can be a good practice.

Overall, the changes seem like reasonable improvements to the codebase. The increased use of fat-arrow functions with clearer coding style and comment conventions help maintain a clean and readable codebase, and the added security measures using express-basic-auth and helmet are a positive step forward in securing the application.

[xedsvg]

The code patch appears to be adding dependencies and devDependencies to the project.

New dependencies added:

• "eslint-config-prettier": "^8.8.0"
• "eslint-plugin-prettier": "^4.2.1"
• "express-basic-auth": "^1.2.1"
• "prettier": "^2.8.8"
• "prometheus-remote-write": "^0.3.0"

New devDependency added:

• "eslint": "^8.42.0"

Without more context on the project, it is difficult to identify specific bug risks or suggest improvements. However, it's worth noting that adding new packages can introduce potential security vulnerabilities or incompatibilities with existing code, so reviewing the changes carefully before merging into production is recommended.

[xedsvg]

Hello! How can I assist you?

[xedsvg]

The code adds a new function called setRestaurantDetails which takes a restaurant name or hostname and retrieves the corresponding restaurant information through an API. The function updates the state of the component with the restaurantId, restaurantName, and products. There are no major bug risks identified, but some suggestions for improvement are:

• Remove commented-out code because it adds confusion to future readers.
• Consider removing repeated alert messages in the setRestaurantDetails function and throwing an error instead.
• Check whether the API call in setRestaurantDetails is successful and handle errors appropriately by catching any exceptions.
• Change alert calls to a more user-friendly approach (e.g., displaying a message on the screen instead of using an alert).
• Consider breaking up long conditional blocks into separate functions for readability.
• Use a constant to simplify the boolean expression and improve readability.
• Consider using switch statements instead of nested if statements to improve readability.

Finally, there's an interesting change constructed on lines 123-124 where the variable currentView is added to the condition for the developerMode. This is suggested for cleaner code that correctly displays the Owner button only in the customer view.

[xedsvg]

The code contains some disabled eslint rules, which means the program may have some potential bugs. Disabling eslint is not the ideal way of resolving issues, so it's recommended to fix the specific eslint errors instead.

The function transformOpenOrdersToOpenOrdersPerTable seems to be trying to group related open orders by table, but there are several issues with the implementation:

1. The function modifies the original input array rather than returning a new array, which can cause issues and unexpected outcomes.
2. There are some commented-out code blocks, which may suggest that the current implementation is unfinished or not fully tested.
3. The function has an O(n^3) time complexity due to nested loops, which can result in performance issues for large datasets.

It might be better to write a new function that creates a separate object to store open orders per table, which would avoid the above problems.

Other than that, the code seems okay at a glance.

[xedsvg]

The main change in the code is the addition of useMemo hook to optimize the rendering performance. The OpenOrders component code seems to be filtering open orders according to the selected table or showing all orders when no specific table is selected.

A suggestion for improvement could be to add a unique key to each element in the groupedOrders array, instead of relying on the index passed to the map function. Also, it might be more efficient to filter and group the orders only when there is a change in the selectedTable or openOrders state, instead of doing it on every render.

As for bug risks, one issue that can arise is mutating the state object directly in the cleanup function of the useEffect hook, which may lead to unexpected behavior. A better approach would be to use the setState method to update the state variable.

[xedsvg]

This code patch seems to be implementing dynamic lazy loading for the Table component using React's Suspense API.

Improvements:

• The commented-out useEffect hook could potentially be used to render or perform an action when the state.openOrdersPerTable value changes.
• It is not clear why the Text and Divider components are imported but not used within this component. These imports could potentially be removed to reduce unneeded overhead.

Bugs/Risks:

• Overall, the code patch looks safe, and there don't appear to be any obvious bug risks. However, it is important to ensure that the Table component and its children are designed with lazy loading in mind so that the fallback renders as expected while waiting for the component to load.
• Additionally, it is important to note that React.lazy() only works with default exports. If the Table module were to export non-default modules, this could potentially break the lazy loading functionality.

[xedsvg]

The code patch disables some linting rules and adds a lazy loading of the OccupiedTime component using React Suspense. The functions activeOrders, flattenOrderItems, flattenVariations, removeRecipesBasedOnVariations, and groupItemsByIdAndRecipe are defined inside the Table component, which could be moved out for better reusability.

The useEffect hooks could be replaced with useMemo because they don't have any side effects apart from updating state variables. Also, the keys used in the JSX components should be unique and preferably not derived from an index since this could cause rendering issues.

There are no apparent bug risks in the code, but there is room for improvement in terms of code structure and best practices.

[xedsvg]

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 4 🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 Security concerns No specific security vulnerabilities were identified in the provided code snippets. However, general best practices like ensuring data validation, proper error handling, and secure database connections should be adhered to.

⚡ Key issues to review Error Handling Consider improving error handling by providing more specific messages and possibly logging them for further analysis. This can help in debugging and maintaining the system more efficiently. Error Handling Ensure that all database operations include error handling to prevent the application from crashing and to provide meaningful feedback to the user or system. API Consistency The API paths and methods should be consistent and RESTful. For instance, using POST for 'updateOrderController' might be misleading as it typically suggests a creation operation. Consider using PUT or PATCH for updates. Exception Handling The functions should handle exceptions or errors that could occur during database operations. This includes not finding expected records or issues during save operations. Connection Security The database connection does not specify any security options such as SSL configurations which are important for protecting sensitive data in transit.

[xedsvg]

@CodiumAI-Agent /improve

[CodiumAI-Agent]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible bug	Add error handling for the restaurant database query Implement proper error handling for the database query to ensure that errors are caught and handled appropriately. backend/app/controllers/eventsController/socket/onConnect.js [7] -restaurant = await Restaurants.findById(socket.handshake.query.restaurantId); +try { + restaurant = await Restaurants.findById(socket.handshake.query.restaurantId); +} catch (error) { + console.log('Failed to find restaurant:', error); + return; // Optionally, handle the error more gracefully +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 Why: Proper error handling for database queries is essential to prevent unhandled exceptions and ensure the application behaves gracefully under failure conditions.	10
Enhancement	Improve error handling by providing more detailed error messages Instead of sending a 404 status directly in the catch block, it would be better to send a more descriptive error message to help with debugging and user feedback. backend/app/controllers/appController.js [11] -res.sendStatus(404); +res.status(404).send({ error: 'Restaurant not found', details: error.message }); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Providing more detailed error messages improves debugging and user feedback, which is crucial for identifying issues quickly and enhancing user experience.	9
	Improve error handling by sending error details to the client Instead of just logging the error, it would be beneficial to send the error message back to the client to aid in debugging and provide feedback. backend/app/controllers/ownerController.js [12-13] console.log(error); -res.status(500); +res.status(500).send({ error: 'Internal server error', details: error.message }); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Sending error details to the client aids in debugging and provides valuable feedback, which is important for both developers and users to understand what went wrong.	9
	Improve error logging by using a structured logging tool Replace the direct use of console.log for error handling with a more robust logging mechanism that can differentiate between log levels (info, error, etc.). This will help in better monitoring and debugging in production environments. backend/app/controllers/userController.js [14] -console.log(e); +logger.error(e); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Using a structured logging tool like logger.error instead of console.log enhances error monitoring and debugging, especially in production environments. This is a significant improvement for maintainability and operational efficiency.	8
	Provide detailed error responses to improve client error handling Implement structured error responses that provide more context to the client, instead of just sending status codes. This helps clients handle errors more effectively. backend/app/controllers/userController.js [15] -res.sendStatus(404); +res.status(404).json({ error: 'Product not found', code: 404 }); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Providing detailed error responses with context helps clients handle errors more effectively. This improves the API's usability and client-side error handling, although it is not critical for functionality.	7
	Improve error handling by using a custom error class for database operations Consider using a more specific error handling mechanism for database operations. Instead of throwing a generic Error, you could define a custom error class that better describes the database-related errors. This will make it easier to handle specific errors in the calling functions and improve the maintainability of the error handling system. backend/app/datamodels/tables.js [18-41] -throw new Error('Table not found'); +throw new DatabaseError('Table not found'); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Using a custom error class can improve error handling and make the code more maintainable. However, the suggestion does not provide the implementation of the custom error class, which is necessary for a complete solution.	7
Best practice	Update the populateTableData function to use the current populate method directly on the query instead of execPopulate The populateTableData function currently uses the execPopulate method, which is deprecated. It is recommended to replace it with the populate method directly on the query to avoid deprecation warnings and ensure compatibility with future versions of Mongoose. backend/app/datamodels/tables.js [114-127] -return await table.populate({ +return await Tables.findById(table._id).populate({ path: 'currentTab', populate: { path: 'orders', options: { sort: { createdAt: -1 } }, populate: { path: 'items', populate: { path: 'recipe' } } } -}).execPopulate(); +}); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: This suggestion addresses the use of a deprecated method, ensuring future compatibility with Mongoose. It is a significant improvement that prevents potential issues with future updates.	9
	Add error handling for asynchronous database operations to prevent unhandled promise rejections To avoid potential issues with unhandled promise rejections, consider adding error handling for the asynchronous operations within the getTable function. This could be achieved by wrapping the await calls in a try-catch block. backend/app/datamodels/tables.js [14-34] -const table = await Tables.findById(tableId); +let table; +try { + table = await Tables.findById(tableId); +} catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to find table by ID:', error); + throw new Error('Database operation failed'); +} Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding error handling for asynchronous operations is a good practice to prevent unhandled promise rejections, which can lead to application crashes. This suggestion enhances the robustness of the code.	8
	Improve code readability by using parameter level destructuring Use destructuring at the function parameter level to improve code readability and reduce redundancy. backend/app/controllers/userController.js [7] -const { params: { restaurantId } } = req; +const getMenuController = async ({ params: { restaurantId } }, res) => { Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: Using parameter level destructuring improves code readability and reduces redundancy. This is a good practice for cleaner code but does not significantly impact functionality.	6
Security	Ensure the validity of 'restaurantId' before database operations Add validation for restaurantId to check if it is a valid format (e.g., using regex or a specific validation library) before proceeding with database operations. backend/app/controllers/userController.js [21] -if (!req.params.restaurantId) { +if (!req.params.restaurantId || !isValidRestaurantId(req.params.restaurantId)) { Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 Why: Adding validation for restaurantId ensures that only valid IDs are processed, which enhances security and prevents potential errors or attacks. This is a crucial improvement for data integrity and security.	9
Maintainability	Refactor duplicate event emission code into a single function Refactor the duplicate code for emitting events to a separate function to improve code maintainability and reduce redundancy. backend/app/controllers/eventsController/db/onOrderChange.js [23-27] -io.to(ownerRoomName).emit('order:new', { order }); -console.log(`New order sent in room: "${ownerRoomName}"`); -io.to(tabRoomName).emit('order:new', { order }); -console.log(`New order sent in room: "${tabRoomName}"`); +function emitOrderEvent(roomName, event, data) { + io.to(roomName).emit(event, data); + console.log(`New order sent in room: "${roomName}"`); +} +emitOrderEvent(ownerRoomName, 'order:new', { order }); +emitOrderEvent(tabRoomName, 'order:new', { order }); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Refactoring duplicate code into a single function improves maintainability and reduces redundancy, making the codebase cleaner and easier to manage.	8
	Streamline conditional checks in the getTable function to improve readability and maintainability Refactor the getTable function to reduce duplication and improve code clarity. Specifically, the checks for table being null and table.locked can be streamlined to make the function easier to read and maintain. backend/app/datamodels/tables.js [17-23] if (!table) { throw new Error('Table not found'); -} -if (table.locked && table.pin !== pin) { +} else if (table.locked && table.pin !== pin) { throw new Error('Incorrect pin'); } Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion improves readability and maintainability by reducing code duplication. However, the improvement is minor and does not significantly impact the functionality.	6