Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(WIP) Add users #181

Closed
wants to merge 33 commits into from
Closed

(WIP) Add users #181

wants to merge 33 commits into from

Conversation

AshGodfrey
Copy link
Contributor

@AshGodfrey AshGodfrey commented Aug 18, 2023

Description

Adds userland

Documentation

Does this require changes to the WorkOS Docs? E.g. the API Reference or code snippets need updates.

[ x] Yes -- https://github.com/workos/workos/pull/22693

If yes, link a related docs PR and add a docs maintainer as a reviewer. Their approval is required.

Ash Godfrey and others added 30 commits August 14, 2023 16:49
Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
* update user

* remove usertype enum

---------

Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
* add listAuthFactor method

* Add EnrollAuthFactor method (#195)

---------

Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
@ibrahimbutt
Copy link

ibrahimbutt commented Mar 1, 2024

@AshGodfrey is this still being worked on?

@ibrahimbutt
Copy link

ibrahimbutt commented Mar 3, 2024

CC @dliu-workos

@ibrahimbutt
Copy link

ibrahimbutt commented Mar 3, 2024

@oliverzheng @tribble

Can this be approved and merged please? There is no user management support in the SDK, whereas the other SDKs have it. Are you not supporting Kotlin and Java?

Respectfully, I don't understand why this PR is dead, and it certainly reduces my faith in using WorkOS, considering the tooling is not being maintained or developed, especially for something widespread as the JVM. I've been watching this PR for months, and have previously had to go through the pain of using the user management API without the SDK. This time round, it may be easier to go with another option, even though we are very happy with the platform :(

@PaulAsjes
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ibrahimbutt, apologies for the delay here. I'm going to look into getting this merged.

@southgate
Copy link

Hi @ibrahimbutt, EM on the team here responsible for this API. Landing this PR is something we're planning to work on in the coming weeks. Would that work for your timeline?

@ibrahimbutt
Copy link

Hi @southgate. Glad to hear this is in the pipeline! A few weeks works for our timeline. Thank you!

@ibrahimbutt
Copy link

Hi @southgate, checking in as it has been 3 weeks. Is there an ETA on this?

@southgate
Copy link

Missed this notification. We're getting started on this shortly @ibrahimbutt. Will loop back to you with an ETA later this week.

* add update user

* update method names (#198)

Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Ash Godfrey <[email protected]>
@amadeo-workos
Copy link
Contributor

@ibrahimbutt we are going to be actively working on adding user management functionality into the SDK this month. You should expect it to be ready by April 29th.

@amadeo-workos
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this PR in favor of #212, which contains the full support for User Management.

@ibrahimbutt
Copy link

Thank you for the updates @southgate @amadeo-workos!

@amadeo-workos
Copy link
Contributor

@ibrahimbutt

The UM support in the Java SDK has shipped! ⛵ it is under the 3.1.0-beta.user-management1 version. Please check it out and let us know how it goes!

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants