Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade python from 3.11.8-slim-bookworm to 3.13.0rc1-slim-bookworm #4344

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rubenfiszel
Copy link
Contributor

@rubenfiszel rubenfiszel commented Sep 6, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the dockerfile dependencies of this project.

Keeping your Docker base image up-to-date means you’ll benefit from security fixes in the latest version of your chosen image.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • Dockerfile

We recommend upgrading to python:3.13.0rc1-slim-bookworm, as this image has only 43 known vulnerabilities. To do this, merge this pull request, then verify your application still works as expected.

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
critical severity CVE-2024-37371
SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-7411315
  714  
critical severity CVE-2024-37371
SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-7411315
  714  
critical severity CVE-2024-37371
SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-7411315
  714  
critical severity CVE-2024-37371
SNYK-DEBIAN12-KRB5-7411315
  714  
high severity Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling
SNYK-DEBIAN12-SYSTEMD-6277507
  614  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling


🚀 This description was created by Ellipsis for commit d65fda9

Summary:

Update Dockerfile to use python:3.13.0rc1-slim-bookworm to address security vulnerabilities.

Key points:

  • Update Dockerfile to use python:3.13.0rc1-slim-bookworm instead of python:3.11.8-slim-bookworm.
  • Addresses security vulnerabilities CVE-2024-37371 and SNYK-DEBIAN12-SYSTEMD-6277507.
  • Reduces known vulnerabilities in the base image to 43.

Generated with ❤️ by ellipsis.dev

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Deploying windmill with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: d65fda9
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://f33e060c.windmill.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://snyk-fix-c27766c34f3487c4d23.windmill.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link
Contributor

@ellipsis-dev ellipsis-dev bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to d65fda9 in 12 seconds

More details
  • Looked at 13 lines of code in 1 files
  • Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
  • Skipped posting 0 drafted comments based on config settings.

Workflow ID: wflow_GvyHvyPUBL7zasPd


Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
ARG DEBIAN_IMAGE=debian:bookworm-slim
ARG RUST_IMAGE=rust:1.80-slim-bookworm
ARG PYTHON_IMAGE=python:3.11.8-slim-bookworm
ARG PYTHON_IMAGE=python:3.13.0rc1-slim-bookworm
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using a release candidate (3.13.0rc1) for Python can be risky in production environments. Consider using a stable release instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants