You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The order of the curators for individual signatures isn't important, only the total counts shown in the frequency table, ie the number of contributions of each curator.
cleaned up so that we show counts for individual curators, rather than combinations. The latter might involve a call to a corrected stratifyByCurator function rather than this table call. You can count all contributions whether they are as first, second, third... in the list.
In "Curation Output" section of http://waldronlab.io/BugSigDBStats/articles/BugSigDBStats.html#statistical-analysis - for example, "Claregrieve1,Chloe,WikiWorks743" should be separated and counted under individual curators (Claregrieve1 and Chloe). Get rid of the WikiWorks curators.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: