Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate comma-delimited revision editors #12

Open
lwaldron opened this issue Jul 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Separate comma-delimited revision editors #12

lwaldron opened this issue Jul 22, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lwaldron
Copy link
Member

In "Curation Output" section of http://waldronlab.io/BugSigDBStats/articles/BugSigDBStats.html#statistical-analysis - for example, "Claregrieve1,Chloe,WikiWorks743" should be separated and counted under individual curators (Claregrieve1 and Chloe). Get rid of the WikiWorks curators.

@lwaldron lwaldron added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 22, 2022
@villafup
Copy link

Would the expected output be:

Var1	                                   | Freq	
WikiWorks743,Cynthia Anderson,LGeistlinger |   2       -->

Curator1 	 | Curator2 	| Curator3  | Freq
Cynthia Anderson | LGeistlinger |   NULL    |   2

And I found one where %WikiWorks% was the only curator.

Is there a max number of curators? Or is the maximum number of curators variable?

@lwaldron
Copy link
Member Author

The order of the curators for individual signatures isn't important, only the total counts shown in the frequency table, ie the number of contributions of each curator.

@lwaldron
Copy link
Member Author

Or more specifically, I'd like to get the output currently shown by:

npc <- stratifyByCurator(dat)
plotCuratorStats(dat, npc)

And

table(dat[,"Revision editor"])

cleaned up so that we show counts for individual curators, rather than combinations. The latter might involve a call to a corrected stratifyByCurator function rather than this table call. You can count all contributions whether they are as first, second, third... in the list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants