Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prophe #2355

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Prophe #2355

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

seunsanyaa
Copy link

Project Abstract

Prophe is a leading-edge platform for managing blockchain projects, offering essential tools for developers and dapps. With features like smart contract analysis, transaction simulation, and real-time alerting, Prophe ensures project success and efficiency.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (DOT, USDC & USDT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @_______:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 5, 2024

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Aug 5, 2024
@seunsanyaa
Copy link
Author

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

Copy link
Member

@semuelle semuelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for the application, @seunsanyaa. But could you please review our FAQ and application template and adapt your deliveries tables to this information? For example:

  • The 0x deliverables are mandatory for all milestones
  • All deliverables should be verifiable and reusable, and setting up a load balancer isn't what I'd consider reusable.
  • We don't fund the design phase of a project, so the 0a deliverables aren't fundable.

@semuelle semuelle added the changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first. label Aug 6, 2024
@semuelle semuelle self-assigned this Aug 6, 2024
Copy link
Member

@semuelle semuelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update, @seunsanyaa. There are some interesting ideas in your application, but there are still some things I would like clarification on:

  1. Individually, contract monitoring, address monitoring, analytics and event notifications are useful concepts, but I've not come across a platform that offers these in this combination. Can you give an example of someone who might be interested in all of these?
  2. Some of the deliverables are still a bit vague, e.g. "Data Indexing Framework". Please specify what exactly you deliver for each deliverable and in what form (document, code, etc.).
  3. There are well established data analysis platforms for Polkadot already out there. How are you planning to compete with them, when analysis is only a part of what you want to offer?

@seunsanyaa
Copy link
Author

seunsanyaa commented Aug 16, 2024 via email

@PieWol PieWol assigned PieWol and unassigned semuelle Aug 22, 2024
@PieWol
Copy link
Member

PieWol commented Aug 28, 2024

Hey @seunsanyaa ,
could you please help me understand which type of smart contracts you are planning to cover? There are currently those which are literally EVM SC that live on chains like Moonbeam. Then we have the ink! contracts that are powered by a pallet within the substrate chain and in the future there will be PolkaVM that will allow for execution of solidity projects that were compiled to RISC-V.

@seunsanyaa
Copy link
Author

seunsanyaa commented Sep 4, 2024 via email

Copy link
Collaborator

@Noc2 Noc2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the application. Have you already started working on the project? At the moment, there is nothing in your repo: https://github.com/prophexyz And what do you mean with side-chains in this case? Do you have concrete examples/users?

@PieWol
Copy link
Member

PieWol commented Sep 10, 2024

With you trying to build this product for EVM smart contracts first, what would be the actual benefit of it over using tenderly? Don't they work for all EVM networks out there?

@PieWol
Copy link
Member

PieWol commented Sep 17, 2024

Hey @seunsanyaa , any updates to share?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants