Skip to content

Added text about which specification is authoritative. #64

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2016

Conversation

alvestrand
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #5
Partially addresses #55

Copy link
Contributor

@vr000m vr000m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, modulo minor fixes

@@ -88,29 +88,55 @@
[[!WEBRTC]].
</p>
</section><!-- VS: getStats() remains in base spec! -->
<section class="informative">
<h2>Basic concepts</h2>
<p>The stats API is defined in [[!GETUSERMEDIA]]. It is defined to return
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wrong reference? Shouldn't this be [[!webrtc]]

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops. Yes.

<p>The <code>RTCStatsType</code> member indicates the type of the
object that the
<code>RTCStats</code> object represents. An object with a given "type"
can be only one type of dictionary, but multiple "type" values may use
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

missing: use

can be only /use/ one type of dictionary

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's grammatically correct as it stands, but hard to read. Reformulating.

@alvestrand
Copy link
Contributor Author

@vr000m please take another look

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants