Skip to content

Add note about transaction-amount to 1.3.5 understanding #4362

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

patrickhlauke
Copy link
Member

Follow-up to #3539

Adds a note that tries to square the circle on why "transaction amount" is included.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Deploy Preview for wcag2 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 78dcbf9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/wcag2/deploys/68151210925aa70008511146
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4362--wcag2.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

<p>When the user agent and assistive technology support for other metadata formats matures, metadata schemes like the <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/adapt-symbols/">WAI-Adapt: Symbols Module</a> may be used in addition or instead of the HTML autocomplete attribute to identify the purpose of input fields. They can also support automated adaptations that identify and match author-provided input labels to defined vocabularies or symbols that are used instead for labelling inputs.</p>
<p class="note">Even though the normative wording of this Success Criterion mentions <q>information about the user</q>, the list of <a href="https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/#input-purposes">Input Purposes</a> includes a few values that may not strictly be interpreted as directly relating to a user – most prominently, <code>transaction-amount</code>. In this specific case, authors are required to identify the input fields for transaction amounts when it's a transaction that users are carrying out for themselves.</p>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"for themselves" seems a little awkward. TF would like someone to wordsmith this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants