Skip to content

Suggestions from January review on Abstract #190

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 1, 2025
Merged

Conversation

pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

@pchampin pchampin commented Apr 23, 2025

Bob DuCharme's 6th comment
https://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]

Bob points out that what looks like an enumeration of 3 things
is actually an enumeration of 2 things.
(this is actually closer to the original phrasing in RDF 1.1 Concepts,
which was "fixed" probably because of an ugly repetition of "and".
I avoided the repetition by using "then")
@pchampin pchampin added spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) labels Apr 23, 2025
@pchampin pchampin requested review from hartig, gkellogg and afs April 23, 2025 23:27
Copy link
Contributor

@hartig hartig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a few minor fixes.

pchampin and others added 2 commits April 24, 2025 16:41
Co-authored-by: Olaf Hartig <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
@afs afs merged commit 0b0a91d into main May 1, 2025
2 checks passed
@afs afs deleted the 2025-01-reviews-abstract branch May 1, 2025 17:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) spec:enhancement Change to enhance the spec without affecting conformance (class 2) –see also spec:editorial
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants