Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add spinner variant #4869

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: feat/fo-assistant
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add spinner variant #4869

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

Br2850
Copy link
Contributor

@Br2850 Br2850 commented Sep 30, 2024

  • Add LoadingView spinner variant
Screenshot 2024-09-30 at 3 12 23 PM Screenshot 2024-09-30 at 3 13 10 PM

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new LoadingSpinner component that utilizes Material-UI's CircularProgress for loading indications. Additionally, the existing LoadingView component has been updated to allow for a more flexible loading display, enabling it to render either the LoadingSpinner or LoadingDots based on a new variant property. This enhances the loading experience by providing options for visual representation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
app/packages/components/src/components/Loading/LoadingSpinner.tsx Introduced a new LoadingSpinner component that accepts optional color and size props, defaulting to "base" and "medium". The spinner's appearance is styled based on these props.
app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/LoadingView.tsx Modified the LoadingView component to replace the label property with text, variant, color, and size. The rendering logic now conditionally displays either LoadingSpinner or LoadingDots based on the variant.

Poem

In a world where loading spins,
A rabbit hops and softly grins.
With colors bright and sizes grand,
Our spinners twirl, just as we planned.
Loading dots or spins, oh what a sight,
Hooray for changes, all feels just right! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/packages/components/src/components/Loading/LoadingSpinner.tsx (2)

5-11: Component definition looks good, with a minor suggestion.

The LoadingSpinner component is well-defined with appropriate props and default values. For improved readability and reusability, consider extracting the prop types to a separate interface:

interface LoadingSpinnerProps {
  color?: string;
  size?: string;
}

const LoadingSpinner: React.FC<LoadingSpinnerProps> = ({
  color = "base",
  size = "medium",
}) => {
  // ...
}

12-25: Color and size mappings are well-defined, with a suggestion for improvement.

The COLORS and SIZES objects provide a clear mapping for the component props. However, consider using theme values for sizes to improve consistency and customization:

import { Theme } from '@mui/material/styles';

// ...

const SIZES: { [key: string]: (theme: Theme) => string } = {
  small: (theme) => theme.spacing(3),
  medium: (theme) => theme.spacing(6),
  large: (theme) => theme.spacing(9),
};

// Usage in the component
<CircularProgress 
  sx={{ color: COLORS[color] }} 
  size={(theme) => SIZES[size](theme)} 
/>

This approach allows the sizes to adapt to the theme's spacing, making the component more flexible and consistent with the overall design system.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/LoadingView.tsx (2)

10-10: Props destructuring looks good, but could benefit from TypeScript types.

The updated props destructuring is correct and includes appropriate default values. However, to improve type safety and code clarity, consider adding explicit TypeScript types for the view object and its properties.

Here's a suggested improvement:

interface ViewProps {
  text?: string;
  variant?: 'spinner' | 'dots';
  color?: string;
  size?: number | string;
}

const { text = "Loading", variant, color, size } = view as ViewProps;

This change would provide better type checking and autocompletion for the view object properties.


14-18: Conditional rendering logic is good, but could be more robust.

The new conditional rendering logic effectively switches between LoadingSpinner and LoadingDots based on the variant prop. The code is clean and easy to understand.

To improve robustness, consider handling cases where variant might have an invalid value:

{variant === "spinner" ? (
  <LoadingSpinner color={color} size={size} />
) : variant === "dots" ? (
  <LoadingDots text={text} {...getComponentProps(props, "loading")} />
) : (
  <LoadingDots text={text} {...getComponentProps(props, "loading")} />
)}

This ensures that LoadingDots is used as a fallback for any invalid variant values, maintaining consistent behavior.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between babdb74 and a3627b4.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/packages/components/src/components/Loading/LoadingSpinner.tsx (1 hunks)
  • app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/LoadingView.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
app/packages/components/src/components/Loading/LoadingSpinner.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/LoadingView.tsx (1)

Pattern **/*.{ts,tsx}: Review the Typescript and React code for conformity with best practices in React, Recoil, Graphql, and Typescript. Highlight any deviations.

🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/packages/components/src/components/Loading/LoadingSpinner.tsx (4)

1-3: Imports look good!

The necessary imports for React and Material-UI's CircularProgress are correctly included.


26-26: Component rendering is correct and efficient.

The CircularProgress component is rendered with appropriate props, using the COLORS and SIZES mappings effectively. The use of the sx prop for styling is a good practice in Material-UI.


29-29: Export statement is correct.

The LoadingSpinner component is properly exported as the default export, following common React practices.


1-29: Overall implementation aligns well with PR objectives.

The LoadingSpinner component successfully introduces a new variant for the LoadingView component, as outlined in the PR objectives. It leverages Material-UI's CircularProgress and provides customizable color and size options, enhancing the loading experience with visual flexibility.

The implementation follows React and Material-UI best practices, with room for minor improvements in prop type definitions and theme integration for sizes. These suggestions, if implemented, would further enhance the component's reusability and consistency with the overall design system.

app/packages/core/src/plugins/SchemaIO/components/LoadingView.tsx (2)

2-2: LGTM: New import statement is correctly added.

The import for LoadingSpinner is properly formatted and consistent with the existing import style.


1-21: Overall, the changes to LoadingView.tsx are well-implemented and enhance functionality.

The introduction of the spinner variant and the flexibility to choose between different loading indicators is a valuable addition. The code is clean, readable, and follows React best practices.

Some minor suggestions for improvement:

  1. Add TypeScript types for better type safety.
  2. Implement more robust handling of invalid variant values.

These changes successfully meet the PR objective of adding a spinner variant to the LoadingView component.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants