Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adding maintainer relation #46

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adding maintainer relation #46

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

chenejac
Copy link
Contributor

@chenejac chenejac commented Jul 5, 2024

VIVO-Ontology GitHub issue: 28

What does this pull request do?

Add Maintainership subclass of Relationship for establishing maintainer relation between software and person

Interested parties

Tag (@ mention) interested parties or.

@chenejac chenejac linked an issue Jul 5, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Add relationships for other contribution types #28
Open
@chenejac chenejac marked this pull request as ready for review August 15, 2024 09:25
@hauschke
Copy link
Member

Discussion in https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/VIVO/2024-09-18+Ontology+Interest+Group+Call:

  • Further investigations are needed on which level of granularity we want the software contributor roles to be.
  • If we decide on the few roles from codemeta we need to describe them and probably establish a hierarchy to enable future roles to be added at the correct place
  • one idea would be to have only one role with the possibility to add a label, which specifies the role. This is being the case for http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#ResearcherRole already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
software codemeta alignment
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add relationships for other contribution types
2 participants
@chenejac @hauschke