Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ensure equivalence between a nested composite and the same state/processes merged into the outer composite #93

Open
prismofeverything opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Ensure equivalence between a nested composite and the same state/processes merged into the outer composite #93

prismofeverything opened this issue Nov 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@prismofeverything
Copy link
Contributor

We should be able to perform a "cut", and wrap a subtree in a "composite", and also "uncut" where we unwrap a composite and merge its states, and have everything behave in an equivalent way.
@prismofeverything
Copy link
Contributor Author

The cut needs to generate a bridge (!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@prismofeverything