chore(deps): Bump thiserror from 1.0.51 to 1.0.56

[dependabot]

Bumps thiserror from 1.0.51 to 1.0.56.

Release notes

Sourced from thiserror's releases.

1.0.56

• Update proc-macro2 to fix caching issue when using a rustc-wrapper such as sccache

1.0.55

• Work around improperly cached build script result by sccache – second attempt (#280)

1.0.54

• Work around improperly cached build script result by sccache – first attempt (#279)

1.0.53

• Reduce spurious rebuilds under RustRover IDE when using a nightly toolchain (#270)

1.0.52

• Fix interaction with RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP (#269)

Commits

• 77d0af4 Release 1.0.56
• d4caabd Pull in proc-macro2 sccache fix
• 6089273 Release 1.0.55
• 322a2ae Merge pull request #280 from dtolnay/depinfo
• fd7d7a5 Emit dep-info for probe.rs in case sccache needs it
• 447c328 Release 1.0.54
• 4619db8 Merge pull request #279 from dtolnay/depinfo
• 7b53bff Make env-dep:RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP get listed in probe's dep-info
• e0500ad Merge pull request #277 from dtolnay/nightlyci
• 48cea47 Make CI verify that error_generic_member_access works in latest nightly
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[github-actions]

Your preview site for the Rust Doc will be ready in a few minutes, please allow time for it to build.

Heres your preview link:
Rust Doc preview

[neuronull]

@dependabot rebase

[github-actions]

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: fefa422e-2ebb-4e52-aaa7-982acec6977d
Baseline: 14ae52e
Comparison: 84de179
Total CPUs: 7

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

• ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
• ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
• ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf	experiment	goal	Δ mean %	Δ mean % CI
➖	syslog_humio_logs	ingress throughput	+0.94	[+0.84, +1.05]
➖	splunk_hec_route_s3	ingress throughput	+0.82	[+0.33, +1.31]
➖	otlp_http_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.68	[+0.52, +0.83]
➖	datadog_agent_remap_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.59	[+0.50, +0.68]
➖	syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics	ingress throughput	+0.58	[+0.43, +0.74]
➖	otlp_grpc_to_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.49	[+0.40, +0.57]
➖	http_elasticsearch	ingress throughput	+0.47	[+0.41, +0.54]
➖	http_to_http_acks	ingress throughput	+0.41	[-0.91, +1.73]
➖	datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs	ingress throughput	+0.39	[+0.28, +0.49]
➖	datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks	ingress throughput	+0.38	[+0.29, +0.47]
➖	syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole	ingress throughput	+0.30	[+0.16, +0.45]
➖	syslog_splunk_hec_logs	ingress throughput	+0.17	[+0.11, +0.23]
➖	http_to_http_noack	ingress throughput	+0.16	[+0.08, +0.24]
➖	http_to_s3	ingress throughput	+0.15	[-0.13, +0.43]
➖	http_to_http_json	ingress throughput	+0.03	[-0.04, +0.11]
➖	splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.16, +0.16]
➖	splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole	ingress throughput	-0.00	[-0.15, +0.14]
➖	enterprise_http_to_http	ingress throughput	-0.03	[-0.10, +0.05]
➖	splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack	ingress throughput	-0.04	[-0.15, +0.08]
➖	file_to_blackhole	egress throughput	-0.49	[-2.91, +1.93]
➖	socket_to_socket_blackhole	ingress throughput	-0.54	[-0.61, -0.46]
➖	http_text_to_http_json	ingress throughput	-0.57	[-0.68, -0.45]
➖	datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks	ingress throughput	-0.74	[-0.85, -0.63]
➖	syslog_loki	ingress throughput	-0.82	[-0.86, -0.78]
➖	syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics	ingress throughput	-0.83	[-0.95, -0.72]
➖	fluent_elasticsearch	ingress throughput	-1.00	[-1.47, -0.53]
➖	syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics	ingress throughput	-3.19	[-3.31, -3.07]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".