Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor workflows #121

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Refactor workflows #121

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

justinshannon
Copy link
Contributor

@justinshannon justinshannon commented Feb 4, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Refined automated build and code analysis triggers to respond more dynamically based on pull request details and labels.
    • Adjusted the process to focus on relevant events rather than automatic triggers, enhancing efficiency.
    • Restructured release workflows to separate build artifact handling from asset uploads for improved consistency across platforms.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 4, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes update three GitHub Actions workflows. In both the build and CodeQL workflows, the conditions for skipping CI jobs now check for the string “[skip ci]” in pull request titles, bodies, or labels instead of “[ci skip]”, and the triggering events have been adjusted. In the release workflow, job identifiers have been renamed to reflect a build-centric process, and the artifact upload step has been refactored into a dedicated job using the actions/upload-artifact@v4 action. These modifications refine the control flow and dependency management across the workflows.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml and .github/workflows/codeql.yml Updated triggering conditions: replaced checks for “[ci skip]” with checks for “[skip ci]” in PR titles, bodies, and labels. In build.yml, the push event for the main branch was removed, and in codeql.yml, branch-specific triggers were removed to enable triggering on any branch.
.github/workflows/release.yml Renamed release job identifiers to build job names (e.g., release-linuxbuild-linux), and separated artifact upload into a new job (upload-release-assets) that uses actions/upload-artifact@v4. Modified output handling ($GITHUB_OUTPUT instead of $GITHUB_ENV) and updated job dependencies for structured release publishing.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PR as "Pull Request"
    participant GitHub as "GitHub Actions"
    participant BuildJob as "Build Job"
    participant CodeQLJob as "CodeQL Job"
    
    PR->>GitHub: Submit/Update with title, body, labels
    GitHub->>GitHub: Check for “[skip ci]” flag and label
    alt Skip CI conditions met
        GitHub-->>BuildJob: Skip build job
        GitHub-->>CodeQLJob: Skip CodeQL analysis
    else
        GitHub->>BuildJob: Execute build workflow (PR/Merge trigger)
        GitHub->>CodeQLJob: Execute CodeQL analysis (all branch trigger)
    end
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Repo as "Repository"
    participant BuildLinux as "Build-Linux"
    participant BuildMac as "Build-MacOS"
    participant BuildWin as "Build-Windows"
    participant Uploader as "Upload-Assets"
    participant Publisher as "Publish Release"
    
    Repo->>BuildLinux: Trigger build job
    Repo->>BuildMac: Trigger build job
    Repo->>BuildWin: Trigger build job
    BuildLinux->>Uploader: Upload Linux artifacts
    BuildMac->>Uploader: Upload MacOS artifacts
    BuildWin->>Uploader: Upload Windows artifacts
    Uploader->>Publisher: Trigger release publishing
Loading

Poem

I'm a bunny with a twitching nose,
Hopping through changes as the CI flows.
With “[skip ci]” now in the mix we see,
The builds and scans roam wild and free.
Jobs renamed and artifacts in a neat new dance,
This rabbit cheers for our refined CI chance!
🐇🌟

Tip

🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
  • We have enabled web search-based reviews and chat for all users. This feature allows CodeRabbit to access the latest documentation and information on the web.
  • You can disable this feature by setting web_search: false in the knowledge_base settings.
  • Please share any feedback in the Discord discussion.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67ff3aa and 9d41f28.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/codeql.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (8 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@justinshannon justinshannon merged commit c3d9f28 into main Feb 4, 2025
1 of 9 checks passed
@justinshannon justinshannon deleted the chore/workflow-updates branch February 4, 2025 23:33
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant