try to make opam-repository happy

Who knows why opam cares about running tests, but opam-dune-lint doesn't test them, and
who knows if it's possible to check build results locally

dune-project

@@ -3,14 +3,9 @@
 (name ppx_partial)
 
 (generate_opam_files true)
-
-(source
- (github v-gb/ppx_partial))
-
+(source (github v-gb/ppx_partial))
 (authors "Valentin Gatien-Baron")
-
 (maintainers "Valentin Gatien-Baron")
-
 (license ISC)
 
 (package
@@ -26,12 +21,16 @@ This can be convenient in pipelines or to build arguments for `List.map`
 or any places that need single-argument functions.
 
 As a slight generalization, `__.record_field` and `Sum_constructor __`
-allow shortening `fun x -> x.record_field` and `(fun x -> Sum_constructor x)`.
+allow shortening `(fun x -> x.record_field)` and `(fun x -> Sum_constructor x)`.
 ")
  (depends
-  (ppxlib
-   (>= 0.32.1))
-  ocaml
-  dune)
+  (ppxlib (>= 0.32.1))
+  (ocaml (>= 4.14.0))
+  dune
+  (base :with-test)
+  (ppx_pipebang :with-test)
+  (ppx_inline_test :with-test)
+  (ppx_assert :with-test)
+ )
  (tags
   (syntax ppx)))

ppx_partial.opam

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ This can be convenient in pipelines or to build arguments for `List.map`
 or any places that need single-argument functions.
 
 As a slight generalization, `__.record_field` and `Sum_constructor __`
-allow shortening `fun x -> x.record_field` and `(fun x -> Sum_constructor x)`.
+allow shortening `(fun x -> x.record_field)` and `(fun x -> Sum_constructor x)`.
 """
 maintainer: ["Valentin Gatien-Baron"]
 authors: ["Valentin Gatien-Baron"]
@@ -21,8 +21,12 @@ homepage: "https://github.com/v-gb/ppx_partial"
 bug-reports: "https://github.com/v-gb/ppx_partial/issues"
 depends: [
   "ppxlib" {>= "0.32.1"}
-  "ocaml"
+  "ocaml" {>= "4.14.0"}
   "dune" {>= "3.15"}
+  "base" {with-test}
+  "ppx_pipebang" {with-test}
+  "ppx_inline_test" {with-test}
+  "ppx_assert" {with-test}
   "odoc" {with-doc}
 ]
 build: [