RFC Move histogram CPU backend implementation to Supported #2015
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
|
Reminder to myself that I need to address #1974 (comment) |
|
It would also be good to add the library version macro, specification macro and/or feature macro values which indicate if the feature is supported. You might as well mention that value for the device policies. Any potential future improvements can be mentioned as well. |
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alexey Kukanov <[email protected]>
|
@akukanov Thanks, the edits are good and have applied your suggestions. |
…age type. Signed-off-by: Dan Hoeflinger <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The introduction can perhaps be updated as well.
| ### Version Information | ||
| Histogram APIs are supported for host execution policies as of version 2022.8.0 of oneDPL, specification version 1.4. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be great to found the version information easily at the beginning of the document.
Also I would move up the chapter describing the implementation above the thoughts on alternatives, which are now mostly of historical interest.
Move histogram CPU backend implementation to supported.
No changes to content so far, pending implementation PR.
This should be merged once histogram implementation has been merged. #1974