Add Oauth Login #279
Add Oauth Login #279
Conversation
|
Note Reviews pausedUse the following commands to manage reviews:
WalkthroughThe recent updates introduce a structured OAuth approach to enhance the application's authentication and authorization capabilities. This includes new environment variables for OAuth, improvements to development environment configurations, and a comprehensive update to the database schema for user management. Additionally, new services and handlers streamline the OAuth flow and improve JWT handling. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AuthHandler
participant AuthService
participant JwtService
User->>AuthHandler: Initiates OAuth login
AuthHandler->>AuthService: Redirects to OAuth provider
AuthService->>User: Redirects to provider's login page
User->>AuthService: Returns with authorization code
AuthService->>AuthHandler: Handles callback with code
AuthHandler->>AuthService: Validates state and retrieves user info
AuthService->>JwtService: Creates JWT for user
JwtService-->>AuthService: Returns JWT
AuthHandler-->>User: Sets cookie and redirects to app
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant AuthHandler
participant AuthService
participant JwtStorage
User->>AuthHandler: Requests logout
AuthHandler->>AuthService: Calls logout function
AuthService->>JwtStorage: Removes user session
JwtStorage-->>AuthService: Confirms logout
AuthService-->>AuthHandler: Returns logout success
AuthHandler-->>User: Redirects to login page
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/redirect.go (1)
27-27: Is there a specific reason for usinghttp.StatusFound?Would
fiber.StatusFoundbe more consistent with the rest of the Fiber framework usage?- c.Redirect(redirectUrl, http.StatusFound) + c.Redirect(redirectUrl, fiber.StatusFound)services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/callback.go (2)
9-13: Could you clarify if the error message provides enough context?Would it be helpful to include more details in the error message to aid debugging?
- fmt.Println("CALLBACK ERROR") + fmt.Println("CALLBACK ERROR:", oauthUserErr)
20-22: Could you clarify if the error message provides enough context?Would it be helpful to include more details in the error message to aid debugging?
- fmt.Println("JWT ERROR") + fmt.Println("JWT ERROR:", jwtErr)services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/callback.go (1)
26-27: Would you consider improving the error logging?Using
fmt.Printlnfor logging errors might not be sufficient. Would you consider using a structured logging library to provide more context?- fmt.Println("#ERROR JWT / CALLBACK", err) + h.logger.Errorf("JWT Callback error: %v", err)services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/verify_jwt.go (1)
9-11: Could you please update the function call inservices/backend/src/web-app/middlewares/authentication.goto match the newVerifyJWTsignature?The current call uses two arguments, but the new signature only accepts one.
services/backend/src/web-app/middlewares/authentication.go(line withjwtService.VerifyJWT)Analysis chain
Could you please verify the function usage?
This function acts as a wrapper for another
VerifyJWTfunction. Is there a specific reason for this design choice? Please ensure that all calls to this function are consistent with the new signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `VerifyJWT` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'VerifyJWT'Length of output: 1814
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (5)
services/backend/src/assets/swagger-css/gopher-coffee.gifis excluded by!**/*.gifservices/go.workis excluded by!**/*.workservices/go.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumservices/go_app_modules/authentication-api/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumservices/go_app_modules/user-api/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (37)
- .env (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- docker-compose.dev.yaml (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/assets/assets.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/configuration/variables.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/1_add_extensions.up.sql (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/callback.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/redirect.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/callback.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/redirect.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_gopher_coffee.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/app.go (3 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/middlewares/authentication.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/routes.go (3 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarAccount/sidebar-account.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarNavigation/navigation.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/go.mod (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/redirect.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/userinfo_model.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/create_jwt.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/model.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/verify_jwt.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/configuration/util-functions.go (2 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/go.mod (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- services/backend/src/assets/assets.go
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/model.go
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/storage/handler.go
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/go.mod
Additional context used
Gitleaks
.env
17-17: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (80)
services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/logout.go (1)
3-5: Can you clarify hows.auth.Logouthandles errors?It would be helpful to understand the error handling mechanism of
s.auth.Logout()to ensure robustness.services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/redirect.go (1)
3-5: Can you clarify hows.auth.CreateRedirecthandles the state parameter?It would be helpful to understand how
s.auth.CreateRedirect(state)processes the state parameter to ensure it is handled securely.services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/logout.go (1)
5-7: Is it necessary to logoauthLogoutEP?Logging sensitive information like
oauthLogoutEPcould be a security concern. Would it be possible to remove this log statement if it's not essential?services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/redirect.go (1)
5-7: Iss.configproperly initialized before callingCreateRedirect? This ensures that theAuthCodeURLmethod works correctly.Could you verify how the
stateparameter is generated and ensure it is securely handled to prevent CSRF attacks?services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/go.mod (3)
6-6: Isgithub.com/go-sqlx/sqlxbeing used effectively in the codebase? This dependency is for SQL database interaction.
7-7: Isgithub.com/golang-jwt/jwtbeing used effectively in the codebase? This dependency is for handling JSON Web Tokens.
8-8: Isgolang.org/x/oauth2being used effectively in the codebase? This dependency is for OAuth 2.0 authentication flows.services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/storage/handler.go (2)
5-7: Is thedbfield inAuthStoragebeing correctly utilized and initialized? This ensures proper database interaction.
9-13: Is thedbparameter passed toNewAuthStoragevalid and correctly initialized? This ensures proper database interaction.services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/service/handler.go (3)
3-5: Is theUserServicestruct correctly defined?The
UserServicestruct looks good. Is there any specific reason for not including additional fields or methods at this stage?
7-11: Is theNewUserServicefunction correctly defined?The
NewUserServicefunction looks good. Is there any specific reason for not including additional initialization logic at this stage?
13-14: Is theUserStoreinterface intentionally left empty?The
UserStoreinterface is currently empty. Is this intentional for future expansion, or are there methods that need to be defined here?services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_gopher_coffee.go (1)
8-11: Is theAssetGopherCoffeefunction correctly defined?The
AssetGopherCoffeefunction looks good. Is there any specific reason for sending the asset as a string instead of a byte slice?services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/handler.go (2)
7-9: Is theAuthHandlerstruct correctly defined?The
AuthHandlerstruct looks good. Is there any specific reason for not including additional fields or methods at this stage?
11-15: Is theNewAuthHandlerfunction correctly defined?The
NewAuthHandlerfunction looks good. Is there any specific reason for not including additional initialization logic at this stage?services/backend/src/web-app/handler.go (2)
5-9: This looks good to me!The
AuthHandlerinterface is well-defined and aligns with the typical responsibilities of an authentication handler.
14-14: This looks good to me!The addition of the
AssetGopherCoffeemethod aligns with the existing methods in theGeneralHandlerinterface.services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/handler.go (1)
15-16: Could you provide more details on the methods intended for this interface?The
JwtStorageinterface is currently empty. It would be helpful to know the methods that are intended to be part of this interface.services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/userinfo_model.go (5)
3-12: Could you clarify the purpose of each field in the struct?The struct
AuthentikUserInfohas several fields. Are all these fields necessary for the OAuth implementation? For example,NicknameandGroupsmight not be required in all cases.
4-4: Is theIDfield secure?The
IDfield is a string representing the user's unique identifier. Is this field securely generated and unique across different providers?
5-6: Are there any concerns with storing email information?The
EmailVerifiedfields store email information. Are there any privacy concerns or regulations that need to be considered when storing this information?
7-10: Can you explain the difference betweenName,DisplayName, andPreferredUsername?The struct contains fields for
Name,DisplayName, andPreferredUsername. Could you provide more details on how these fields are used differently?
11-11: What is the purpose of theGroupsfield?The
Groupsfield is a slice of strings. Could you explain how this field is used and whether it is necessary for the OAuth implementation?services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/1_add_extensions.up.sql (4)
1-1: Is theuuid-osspextension necessary?The
uuid-osspextension is used for generating UUIDs. Are there any specific reasons for choosing this extension over other UUID generation methods?
3-3: Is theidentity_providerENUM type extensible?The ENUM type
identity_providercurrently has a single value 'Authentik'. Are there plans to add more identity providers in the future? How will this ENUM type be updated?
5-8: Is theusernamecolumn length sufficient?The
usernamecolumn is defined asVARCHAR(255). Is this length sufficient for all possible usernames? Are there any constraints on the format of usernames?
10-17: Can you explain the composite primary key choice?The
user_identitiestable uses a composite primary key ofproviderandprovider_user_id. Could you explain the reasoning behind this choice and its impact on performance?services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/create_jwt.go (3)
10-15: Are the JWT claims sufficient?The JWT claims include
user-uuid,exp, andauthorized. Are these claims sufficient for the application's requirements? Are there any additional claims needed?
17-17: Is the signing method secure?The JWT is signed using
HS256. Is this signing method secure enough for the application's requirements? Have other signing methods been considered?
19-23: Is the error handling sufficient?The error handling prints an error message and returns an empty string and the error. Is this error handling sufficient? Should the error be logged more comprehensively?
services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/redirect.go (1)
19-19: Could you clarify ifCreateRedirecthandles invalid states?What happens if the state is invalid or the redirect URL is not properly formed?
services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/handler.go (1)
9-13: Is theuserfield intentionally left uninitialized in the constructor?Should the
userfield be initialized in theNewAuthServiceconstructor for consistency?services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/callback.go (1)
16-18: Is theUserUuidfield the only required field for JWT creation?Are there any additional fields that should be included in the
JwtDataModelfor better security or functionality?services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/handler.go (2)
13-33: Are you handling sensitive information securely?The
OAuthKeyandOAuthSecretare passed as plain strings. Are these values securely stored and retrieved (e.g., from environment variables or a secrets manager)?
13-33: LGTM!The function correctly initializes the OAuth configuration and returns an
AuthServiceinstance.services/backend/src/web-app/middlewares/authentication.go (3)
12-16: Could the extraction logic for theAuthorizationheader be improved?The current logic assumes that the
Authorizationheader is always present if the cookie is not. Should we add a check to ensure the header is properly formatted and contains a token?
18-22: LGTM!The error handling for JWT verification is clear and robust.
25-25: Is storingjwt-tokenin the request context secure?Storing
jwt-tokenin the request context is a good practice. Are there any additional security measures in place to protect this data?services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback.go (4)
10-16: Should we enhance error logging?The error logging for the token exchange is minimal. Would it be beneficial to log more details for debugging purposes?
18-22: LGTM!The function correctly fetches user info using the OAuth token.
25-28: Is the error handling for reading response body sufficient?The error handling for reading the response body is good. Are there any additional steps we should consider to handle edge cases?
30-33: LGTM!The JSON unmarshalling and error handling are correctly implemented.
services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/callback.go (3)
16-18: Could you verify the state validation logic?The state validation is crucial for security. Can you ensure that the
oauthstatecookie is securely set and handled?
25-28: Can you confirm the JWT token handling?If the
jwtTokenis empty or an error occurs, it should be handled more explicitly. Would you consider providing a more detailed error message to the user?
11-38: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarNavigation/navigation.svelte (3)
9-16: Could you verify the URLs of the new navigation links?The new navigation links for "Swagger," "Oauth," and "Logout" look good. Can you ensure that these URLs are correct and functional?
9-16: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
35-36: LGTM!The styling changes are approved.
services/backend/src/web-app/routes.go (4)
24-26: Could you verify the new OAuth routes and handlers?The new routes for OAuth redirect, callback, and logout look good. Can you ensure that the corresponding handlers are correctly implemented and functional?
24-26: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
28-30: Could you verify the middleware functionality?The authentication middleware looks good. Can you ensure that it correctly protects the new routes?
43-47: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/verify_jwt.go (4)
13-24: Is the signing key handling secure?The signing key is returned as a byte slice. Could you confirm that this approach is secure and follows best practices for key management?
30-33: Could you ensure the claims are handled securely?The claims are cast to
jwt.MapClaimsand checked for validity. Are there any additional checks or sanitization steps needed to ensure the claims are secure and trustworthy?
37-39: Could you confirm the handling of theauthorizedclaim?The function checks if the
authorizedclaim is true. Is this sufficient for your authorization logic? Are there any additional checks or context needed here?
41-43: Could you confirm the type assertion foruser-uuid?The
user-uuidclaim is cast to a string. Is it guaranteed that this claim will always be a string? Are there any edge cases that need to be handled?.env (9)
15-15: Could you confirm the variable name change?The variable
APP_SECURITY_JWT_SECREThas been replaced withAPP_AUTHORIZATION_JWT_SECRET. Is this change consistent with the updated focus on authorization throughout the codebase?
17-17: Could you ensure the OAuth client key is securely managed?The OAuth client key is stored in an environment variable. Are there any additional security measures in place to protect this key from exposure?
Tools
Gitleaks
17-17: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Could you ensure the OAuth client secret is securely managed?The OAuth client secret is stored in an environment variable. Are there any additional security measures in place to protect this secret from exposure?
Tools
Gitleaks
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
19-19: Could you confirm the OAuth authorization URL configuration?The OAuth authorization URL is set to
http://localhost:9000/application/o/authorize/. Is this URL correctly configured and accessible in your environment?
20-20: Could you confirm the OAuth token URL configuration?The OAuth token URL is set to
http://authentik-server:9000/application/o/token/. Is this URL correctly configured and accessible in your environment?
21-21: Could you confirm the OAuth redirect URL configuration?The OAuth redirect URL is set to
http://web.localhost/api/v1/oauth/callback. Is this URL correctly configured and accessible in your environment?
22-22: Could you confirm the OAuth user info URL configuration?The OAuth user info URL is set to
http://authentik-server:9000/application/o/userinfo/. Is this URL correctly configured and accessible in your environment?
23-23: Could you confirm the OAuth logout URL configuration?The OAuth logout URL is set to
http://localhost:9000/application/o/gosvelte/end-session/. Is this URL correctly configured and accessible in your environment?
24-24: Could you confirm the OAuth scopes configuration?The OAuth scopes are set to
email openid profile. Are these scopes correctly configured and aligned with your application's requirements?services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/configuration/util-functions.go (1)
17-31: Could you confirm the function logic?The function retrieves an environment variable as a slice of strings. Is the logic for splitting and trimming the values correct and efficient? Are there any edge cases that need to be handled?
services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarAccount/sidebar-account.svelte (4)
7-7: Is the class name update intended to improve specificity?The class name for the main content element has been updated to
sidebar-account-content-element. Could you confirm if this change is aimed at improving CSS specificity and styling?
12-12: Is the additional class attribute for targeted styling?The
Menucomponent now includes an additionalclass="menu"attribute. Is this change intended to allow for more targeted CSS styling?
20-24: Is the logout functionality now API-driven?The logout link's
hrefattribute has been altered from a relative path (/logout) to an absolute API endpoint (/api/v1/oauth/logout). Does this change indicate a shift towards an API-driven logout functionality?
54-57: Are the styling updates aimed at improving user interaction?Styling updates have been introduced, including hover effects for buttons within the menu and global styles for button hover states and SVG colors. Are these changes aimed at enhancing user interaction feedback and visual consistency?
Makefile (1)
6-6: Are the new services added to enhance the development environment?The
devtarget now includesauthentik-serverandauthentik-workerservices. Is this change intended to enhance the development environment by including authentication services?services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.svelte (2)
Line range hint
41-43:
Is the global context for body styles intended for consistent application?The
bodyselector has been changed from a direct definition to a global context using:global(body). Is this change intended to ensure consistent application of background and font colors globally?
Line range hint
45-45:
Is the streamlined sidebar background color rule for clarity?The sidebar's background color rule has been streamlined by eliminating unnecessary conflict markers. Is this change intended to result in a cleaner declaration and ensure proper application of styles across the application?
services/backend/src/configuration/variables.go (3)
11-11: Is SSL/TLS configuration in place?The
WEBSERVER_PORThas been changed to 443, which is typically used for HTTPS. Do you have SSL/TLS configuration set up to support this change?
25-32: Are OAuth variables used securely?New OAuth-related variables have been added. Are these variables used consistently and securely across the codebase? Specifically, how is the
AUTHORIZATION_OAUTH_SECRETmanaged to ensure it is not exposed?
35-42: How are certificate-related variables managed?New certificate-related variables have been added. Are these variables used consistently and securely across the codebase? How is the certificate management handled to ensure security?
services/backend/src/web-app/app.go (3)
34-34: IsAuthHandlercorrectly initialized and used?A new
AuthHandlerfield has been added to theAppstruct. Can you confirm that it is correctly initialized and used within the application?
49-65: Are new services correctly initialized and integrated?The
NewAppfunction has been updated to initialize several new services related to authentication and JWT. Are these services correctly initialized and integrated? How is sensitive information managed to ensure security?
119-126: Are new configuration variables correctly used?The
RunAppfunction has been updated to use the new configuration variables. Can you confirm that these variables are correctly used and that errors are handled appropriately?docker-compose.dev.yaml (1)
1-3: Is the external configuration file correctly included?The change enables the inclusion of the
docker-compose.authentik.yamlfile. Can you confirm that this file is correctly included and used? Are there any potential issues with the environment setup?
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/handler.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
services/backend/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (10)
- services/backend/go.mod (3 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarAccount/sidebar-account.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/de.json (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/en.json (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/stores/darkmode.ts (3 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/theme/general.sass (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/theme/variables.scss (3 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.svelte (4 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/settings/+page.svelte (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/en.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/handler.go
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarAccount/sidebar-account.svelte
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.svelte
Additional comments not posted (16)
services/frontend/src/lib/theme/general.sass (3)
15-17: Looks good!The use of CSS variables for background and border color enhances maintainability and consistency. Did you ensure that these variables are defined and used correctly across the project?
18-21: Nice improvement!The hover effect and color styling enhance user interaction feedback. Are these changes consistent with the overall theme of the application?
22-26: Looks great!The emphasis on the red color and bold font weight, along with the hover effect, provides a clear visual emphasis. Did you verify the visual consistency across different components?
services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/de.json (2)
27-27: Great addition!The new entry for
device_descriptionenhances clarity regarding device-specific settings. Did you ensure the translation is accurate and consistent with the rest of the file?
35-35: Is the removal of the description field intentional?The removal of the
descriptionfield under thethemesection may streamline user interaction. Did you verify that this removal does not negatively impact user understanding?services/frontend/src/lib/theme/variables.scss (3)
7-8: Nice addition!The new CSS custom properties for color management enhance the flexibility of the theme. Did you ensure these variables are used correctly throughout the project?
30-31: Good consistency!The new CSS custom properties for dark mode ensure visual consistency across different themes. Did you verify that these changes are consistent with the light mode properties?
21-23: Great enhancement!The new CSS custom properties for sidebar styling provide more options for customization. Did you ensure these changes are consistent across both light and dark modes?
Also applies to: 44-46
services/frontend/src/lib/stores/darkmode.ts (2)
38-49: Iswindowalways available in all contexts?Could there be any contexts where
windowmight not be available, such as during server-side rendering or in environments without a window object? How do you plan to handle such cases?
38-49: The logic for theme detection looks good!The method
isThemeSetOrAutoDetectcorrectly checks for the theme cookie and useswindow.matchMediato determine the user's preferred color scheme if the cookie is absent.services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/settings/+page.svelte (2)
32-32: The addition of the<span>element looks good!The
<span>element displaying the device description enhances the user interface by providing more context to the user regarding device settings.
61-65: The style adjustments look good!The styles for the
<span>element and the.menuclass improve the layout and visibility of the elements.services/backend/go.mod (4)
10-10: The addition ofgithub.com/uvulpos/go-svelte/authentication-apilooks good!The addition of this dependency indicates the inclusion of an authentication API, which is essential for OAuth login. The replacement with a local path suggests local development or testing.
Also applies to: 16-16
29-29: The addition ofgithub.com/golang-jwt/jwtlooks good!The addition of this dependency suggests the use of JWT for handling authentication tokens, which is a common practice in OAuth implementations.
50-50: The addition ofgolang.org/x/oauth2looks good!The addition of this dependency indicates the use of the OAuth2 library for handling OAuth flows, which is essential for the implementation of OAuth login.
10-10: The overall changes to thego.modfile look good!The new dependencies are added correctly, and the overall structure of the
go.modfile remains intact.Also applies to: 16-16, 29-29, 50-50
|
fyi: I pause pr reviews to spare energy and efforts for a non ready pr. This pr is still an epic and will take some work in progress commits to be finished. And also it annoys me at this stage to have a cluttered log |
|
@coderabbitai full review |
Actions performedFull review triggered. |
| APP_AUTHORIZATION_JWT_SECRET=loafofbread |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
use better jwt secret / certificate
services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/2_add_user.down.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…template into feat/add-oauth
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 38
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (5)
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/interface.go (1)
17-21: Could you add comments for each method?The
ErrorInterfaceis well-defined. Would you consider adding comments for each method to improve readability and maintainability?services/backend/src/resources/user/http/http-models/self_information.go (1)
7-13: Would you consider adding validation tags?The
SelfInformationModeltype is well-defined. Would you consider adding validation tags to ensure data integrity?services/backend/src/resources/user/http/self_information.go (1)
31-31: Have you considered adding a success log?It might be useful to log a success message when the user information is successfully retrieved. Would you agree?
services/backend/src/resources/user/http/self_permission.go (1)
31-31: Have you considered adding a success log?It might be useful to log a success message when the user permissions are successfully retrieved. Would you agree?
services/backend/src/resources/auth/storage/create_login_session.go (1)
30-30: Would you consider adding a log statement for database errors?It might be useful to log database errors for better traceability. What do you think?
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (10)
services/backend/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumservices/backend/src/assets/swagger-css/gopher-coffee.gifis excluded by!**/*.gifservices/backend/src/assets/swagger-css/logo-branding.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngservices/backend/src/assets/swagger-css/logo.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngservices/frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonservices/go.workis excluded by!**/*.workservices/go.work.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumservices/go_app_modules/authentication-api/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumservices/go_app_modules/basic-utils/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumservices/go_app_modules/user-api/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (99)
- .env (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- devops/docker-compose/dev-dependencies/docker-compose.authentik.yaml (2 hunks)
- docker-compose.dev.yaml (1 hunks)
- services/backend/go.mod (3 hunks)
- services/backend/modd.conf (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/assets/assets.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/configuration/variables.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/2_add_user.down.sql (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/2_add_user.up.sql (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/3_add_permissions.up.sql (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/callback.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/redirect.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/callback.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/redirect.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/storage/create_login_session.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_gopher_coffee.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_logo.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_logo_branding.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/general/http/ping_everything.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/http/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/http/http-models/self_information.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/http/http-models/self_permission.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/http/self_information.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/http/self_permission.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/service/get_user_permissions_by_id.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/service/get_user_self_information_by_id.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/service/models/model_self_information.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/service/models/model_user.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/service/models/model_user_permissions.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/get_user_by_id.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/get_user_permissions_by_id.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/models/mode_user.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/app.go (3 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/middlewares/authentication.go (1 hunks)
- services/backend/src/web-app/routes.go (3 hunks)
- services/frontend/package.json (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/get-permissions.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/get-self_information.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/models/SelfInformation.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/models/UserPermissions.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/Sidebar/sidebar.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarAccount/sidebar-account.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarNavigation/navigation.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/functions/permissions/check-user-permission-middleware.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/de.json (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/en.json (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/stores/darkmode.ts (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/theme/general.sass (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/theme/variables.scss (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+error.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.server.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.svelte (5 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/legal/+layout.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/legal/imprint/+page.md (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/secret/+layout.server.ts (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/secret/+layout.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/secret/+page.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/settings/+page.svelte (2 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/+error.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/go.mod (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback_authentik.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/provider/provider.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/redirect.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/userinfo_model.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/create_user.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/create_user_login_identity.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/get_userid_by_login.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/create_jwt.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/model.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/verify_jwt.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/configuration/util-functions.go (2 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/custom-error-const/error_identifier.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/custom-error-const/error_user_messages.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database_not_found.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database_transaction_begin_failed.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database_transaction_commit_failed.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_internal_server.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_test.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/error_handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/interface.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/go.mod (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/go.mod (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/service/handler.go (1 hunks)
- services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/storage/handler.go (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
.env
17-17: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
18-18: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (279)
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/secret/+page.svelte (1)
1-1: Is this file a placeholder?The file contains only one line of content. Is this intended to be a placeholder or is there more content to be added later?
Could you please confirm the purpose of this file?
services/go_app_modules/user-api/go.mod (3)
1-1: Is this module name correct?Is
github.com/uvulpos/go-svelte/userthe intended module name for this project?Could you please confirm if this module name aligns with the project structure and naming conventions?
3-3: Is this the required Go version?Is Go version
1.22.4the required version for this project?Could you please confirm if this is the correct Go version to use for this module?
5-5: Is this the correct dependency version?Is
v1.3.8the required version forgithub.com/go-sqlx/sqlx?Could you please confirm if this is the correct version of the dependency to use for this module?
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/provider/provider.go (2)
3-3: Is this type definition necessary?Is
AuthProviderintended to be used elsewhere in the codebase?Could you please confirm if this type definition is necessary and will be used in other parts of the code?
5-7: Is this the only provider?Is
Authentikthe only authentication provider that will be supported?Could you please confirm if there are plans to support additional authentication providers in the future?
services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/redirect.go (1)
3-5: Is this method tested?Is there a test case for the
CreateRedirectmethod?Could you please confirm if there is a test case for this method to ensure it works as expected?
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+error.svelte (2)
1-3: Looks good!The import statement for the
pagestore is correct.
5-6: Nice improvement!The dynamic error display using the
$pagestore enhances user experience and the use of optional chaining ensures robustness.services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/models/UserPermissions.ts (2)
1-5: Well-defined interface!The
UserPermissionsinterface includes necessary properties for user permissions.
7-7: Useful constant!The
USER_PERMISSION_ADMINconstant is correctly defined and useful for permission checks.services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/logout.go (1)
1-4: Correct package and import!The package and import statements are correctly defined.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/go.mod (3)
6-6: Have you considered the implications of addinggithub.com/go-sqlx/sqlx?This package simplifies database operations, but it also introduces additional dependencies. Is this the best choice for your use case?
Could you please confirm if this package is necessary for your implementation?
7-7: Have you considered the security implications of usinggithub.com/golang-jwt/jwt?This package is crucial for secure authentication mechanisms. Are there any specific security measures you plan to implement with this package?
Could you please confirm if this package meets your security requirements?
8-8: Have you considered the compatibility ofgolang.org/x/oauth2with your existing authentication system?This package is necessary for implementing OAuth login functionality. Are there any compatibility issues you foresee with your current system?
Could you please confirm if this package integrates well with your existing authentication system?
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/redirect.go (1)
5-6: Have you ensured the proper initialization ofauthentikConfig?The function creates a redirect URL for OAuth authentication. Is the
authentikConfigproperly initialized to avoid runtime errors?Could you please confirm if the
authentikConfigis correctly set up before calling this function?services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/go.mod (3)
6-6: Have you considered the implications of addinggithub.com/google/uuid?This package improves UUID generation, but it also introduces additional dependencies. Is this the best choice for your use case?
Could you please confirm if this package is necessary for your implementation?
7-7: Have you considered the implications of addinggotest.tools/v3?This package enhances testing capabilities, but it also introduces additional dependencies. Is this the best choice for your use case?
Could you please confirm if this package is necessary for your implementation?
10-10: Have you considered the implications of addinggithub.com/google/go-cmp?This package improves comparison operations, but it also introduces additional dependencies. Is this the best choice for your use case?
Could you please confirm if this package is necessary for your implementation?
services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/models/SelfInformation.ts (6)
3-3: Looks good!Is the
idalways a string in your database schema?The code changes are approved.
4-4: Looks good!Is there any specific reason for choosing
usernameas a string?The code changes are approved.
5-5: Looks good!Is
display_namealways a string in your database schema?The code changes are approved.
6-6: Looks good!Is
The code changes are approved.
7-7: Looks good!Is
profile_picturealways a string in your database schema?The code changes are approved.
8-8: Looks good!Is
permissionsalways an array of strings in your database schema?The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/storage/handler.go (2)
5-7: Looks good!Is the
dbfield always a pointer tosqlx.DBin your database schema?The code changes are approved.
9-13: Looks good!Is the
dbparameter always a pointer tosqlx.DBin your database schema?The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/storage/handler.go (2)
5-7: Looks good!Is the
dbfield always a pointer tosqlx.DBin your database schema?The code changes are approved.
9-13: Looks good!Is the
dbparameter always a pointer tosqlx.DBin your database schema?The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/user-api/ressources/user/service/handler.go (3)
1-1: Is the package name appropriate?The package is declared as
service. Is this the correct package name for this file?The code changes are approved.
3-11: Is theUserServicestruct and constructor correct?The
UserServicestruct has astoragefield of typeUserStore, and theNewUserServicefunction initializes aUserServicewith the givenUserStore. Is this the correct implementation?The code changes are approved.
13-14: Is theUserStoreinterface intentionally empty?The
UserStoreinterface is defined but does not contain any methods. Are there methods to be added later, or is this intentional?Please verify if the interface is complete.
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/custom-error-const/error_user_messages.go (2)
1-1: Is the package name appropriate?The package is declared as
customerrorconst. Is this the correct package name for this file?The code changes are approved.
3-6: Are the error message constants correct?The file defines constants for error messages:
DATABASE_NOT_FOUND_ERROR_MESSAGEandINTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR_MESSAGE. Are these the correct error messages?The code changes are approved.
services/backend/modd.conf (1)
3-3: Is the path specification update correct?The path specifications are updated to include
/app/go_app_modules/**/*. Is this the correct update to facilitate better integration of modules or components?The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/service/get_user_permissions_by_id.go (1)
7-9: Isnila valid argument for the first parameter ofGetUserPermissionsByID?Could you please confirm if passing
nilas the first argument is intentional and valid in this context?services/backend/src/resources/user/http/http-models/self_permission.go (2)
3-5: LGTM!The struct
SelfPermissionsModelis correctly defined with appropriate JSON tags.
7-11: LGTM!The constructor function
NewSelfPermissionsModelis correctly implemented.services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/model.go (2)
3-6: LGTM!The struct
JwtDataModelis correctly defined with appropriate JSON tags.
8-13: LGTM!The constructor function
NewJwtDataModelis correctly implemented.services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/handler.go (3)
1-1: Is the package declaration appropriate?The package is declared as
http. Is this the correct package for this handler?The code changes are approved.
3-5: Are the imports necessary?The file imports the
servicepackage. Is this import necessary for theAuthHandlerto use theAuthService?The code changes are approved.
7-15: Is the struct and constructor function correctly implemented?The
AuthHandlerstruct has a single fieldservice, and theNewAuthHandlerfunction initializes theAuthHandlerwith the providedAuthService. Is this implementation correct?The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/http/handler.go (3)
1-1: Is the package declaration appropriate?The package is declared as
http. Is this the correct package for this handler?The code changes are approved.
3-5: Are the imports necessary?The file imports the
servicepackage. Is this import necessary for theUserHandlerto use theUserService?The code changes are approved.
7-15: Is the struct and constructor function correctly implemented?The
UserHandlerstruct has a single fieldservice, and theNewUserHandlerfunction initializes theUserHandlerwith the providedUserService. Is this implementation correct?The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/legal/+layout.svelte (1)
11-12: Does the style rule improve readability?The file adds a global style rule for paragraph elements to set the line-height to 1.5. Does this improve readability?
The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/get-permissions.ts (6)
1-1: Is thekylibrary the best choice for HTTP requests?The import statement is correct. Have you considered using other libraries or native fetch for HTTP requests?
2-2: Is theUserPermissionstype used correctly?The import statement is correct. Is the
UserPermissionstype defined properly in./models/UserPermissions?
3-3: Is the empty line necessary for readability?The empty line improves readability. Do you think it is necessary here?
4-4: Is the function signature appropriate?The function signature is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing
Promise<string[]>as the return type?
5-5: Is the HTTP request and response handling correct?The HTTP request and response handling are correct. Have you considered handling potential errors or exceptions that might occur during the request?
6-6: Is the empty line necessary for readability?The empty line improves readability. Do you think it is necessary here?
services/backend/src/resources/user/service/models/model_self_information.go (5)
1-1: Is the package declaration appropriate?The package declaration is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing the
modelspackage?
2-2: Is the empty line necessary for readability?The empty line improves readability. Do you think it is necessary here?
3-6: Is the struct definition appropriate?The struct definition is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing these fields?
7-7: Is the empty line necessary for readability?The empty line improves readability. Do you think it is necessary here?
8-13: Is the constructor function appropriate?The constructor function is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing this implementation?
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/secret/+layout.svelte (5)
1-1: Is the script block declaration appropriate?The script block declaration is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing TypeScript?
2-2: Is the import statement appropriate?The import statement is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing
PageData?
3-3: Is the export statement appropriate?The export statement is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing
data?
4-4: Is the empty line necessary for readability?The empty line improves readability. Do you think it is necessary here?
6-14: Is the conditional block appropriate?The conditional block is correct. Is there any specific reason for choosing
data.status?services/backend/src/assets/assets.go (3)
11-12: Is this embedding correct?The
GopherCoffeevariable is embedding an image file correctly. Could you confirm if this image is used somewhere in the application?The code changes are approved.
14-15: Is this embedding correct?The
Logovariable is embedding an image file correctly. Could you confirm if this image is used somewhere in the application?The code changes are approved.
17-18: Is this embedding correct?The
LogoBrandingvariable is embedding an image file correctly. Could you confirm if this image is used somewhere in the application?The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/2_add_user.down.sql (6)
1-1: Is this constraint removal necessary?The statement to drop the constraint
created_ip_addr_not_empty_stringseems correct. Could you confirm if this constraint is no longer needed?The code changes are approved.
2-2: Is this constraint removal necessary?The statement to drop the constraint
last_jwt_refresh_ip_addr_not_empty_stringseems correct. Could you confirm if this constraint is no longer needed?The code changes are approved.
4-4: Is this table removal necessary?The statement to drop the table
user_sessionsseems correct. Could you confirm if this table is no longer needed?The code changes are approved.
5-5: Is this table removal necessary?The statement to drop the table
user_identitiesseems correct. Could you confirm if this table is no longer needed?The code changes are approved.
6-6: Is this table removal necessary?The statement to drop the table
usersseems correct. Could you confirm if this table is no longer needed?The code changes are approved.
8-8: Is this type removal necessary?The statement to drop the type
identity_providerseems correct. Could you confirm if this type is no longer needed?The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/handler.go (2)
3-6: Could you add input validation in the constructor?It might be helpful to validate the
jwtCertificateandstorageinputs in theNewJwtServiceconstructor to ensure they are not nil or empty. Would you consider adding this?func NewJwtService(storage JwtStorage, jwtCertificate string) *JwtService { + if storage == nil { + panic("storage cannot be nil") + } + if jwtCertificate == "" { + panic("jwtCertificate cannot be empty") + } return &JwtService{ JWT_CERTIFICATE: jwtCertificate, storage: storage, } }
15-16: Is this interface intended to be empty?The
JwtStorageinterface is currently empty. Is this intentional, or are there methods that should be defined here?The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/legal/imprint/+page.md (4)
Line range hint
1-5: Looks good!Is there a reason why the variable
headeris not declared withletorconst?The code changes look good.
6-6: Looks good!Is there a reason why the variable
linefirstis not declared withletorconst?The code changes look good.
7-7: Looks good!Is there a reason why the variable
linesecondis not declared withletorconst?The code changes look good.
8-8: Looks good!Is there a reason why the variable
githubis not declared withletorconst?The code changes look good.
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/error_handler.go (2)
9-11: Looks good!Is there any specific reason for not including error handling within this function?
The code changes look good.
13-15: Looks good!Is there any specific reason for not including error handling within this function?
The code changes look good.
services/frontend/src/lib/functions/permissions/check-user-permission-middleware.ts (1)
3-11: Consider adding error handling and logging.Would it be beneficial to add error handling for the
getUserPermissionscall and logging for permission checks?For example, you could add a try-catch block:
export async function checkUserPermissionMiddleware(jwt: string, permissions: string[]): Promise<boolean> { - const userPermissions = await getUserPermissions(jwt) + let userPermissions; + try { + userPermissions = await getUserPermissions(jwt); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Failed to get user permissions:", error); + return false; + } for (const permission of permissions) { if (!userPermissions.includes(permission)) { return false; } } return true }services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/userinfo_model.go (1)
3-12: Is the JSON key mapping correct?The
AuthentikUserInfostruct maps fields to JSON keys. Are these mappings verified against the expected JSON structure from the OAuth provider?services/backend/src/resources/user/service/models/model_user.go (1)
3-9: Is the field naming consistent?The field names in
UserModelare consistent with common naming conventions. Are these names aligned with other models in the codebase?services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/custom-error-const/error_identifier.go (2)
5-10: Are the error identifiers comprehensive?The constants define various error identifiers. Are these identifiers comprehensive enough to cover all potential error scenarios?
5-10: Is the naming consistent?The naming of the error identifiers is consistent. Are these names aligned with other error identifiers in the codebase?
services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/logout.go (1)
10-22: Could you provide more context in the error handling and set the cookie expiration date to a past date?Currently, the error is returned directly. It might be helpful to provide more context or log the error for better debugging. Also, setting the cookie expiration date to a past date ensures it is deleted.
func (h *AuthHandler) Logout(c *fiber.Ctx) error { c.Cookie(&fiber.Cookie{ Name: "jwt", Path: "/", Value: "", HTTPOnly: true, - Expires: time.Now(), + Expires: time.Now().Add(-time.Hour), }) logoutURL, logoutErr := h.service.Logout() if logoutErr != nil { - return logoutErr + c.Status(http.StatusInternalServerError) + return c.JSON(fiber.Map{ + "error": "Failed to log out", + "details": logoutErr.Error(), + }) } return c.Redirect(logoutURL, http.StatusMovedPermanently) }services/backend/src/resources/auth/storage/handler.go (2)
12-15: Looks good!The function correctly initializes a new AuthStore with a database connection.
The code changes are approved.
18-23: Looks good!The function correctly starts a new database transaction and handles errors appropriately.
The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/web-app/handler.go (3)
5-9: Looks good!The interface is well-defined and promotes a structured approach to managing authentication flows.
The code changes are approved.
10-17: Looks good!The interface is well-defined and enhances the general handling capabilities of the application.
The code changes are approved.
19-21: Looks good!The interface is well-defined and enhances the application's ability to manage user-specific interactions.
The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/models/mode_user.go (2)
5-11: Are the field types and tags appropriate?Could you confirm if the field types and tags are appropriate for the database schema?
13-21: Is the conversion logic accurate?Could you confirm if the conversion logic accurately reflects the intended mapping between the storage model and the service model?
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/handler.go (2)
8-10: Is the field type appropriate?Could you confirm if the field type for the database connection is appropriate?
18-23: Is the error handling appropriate?Could you confirm if the error handling in the
StartTransactionmethod is appropriate and follows best practices?services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_logo.go (1)
17-19: Is the logo correctly encoded and sent?Could you confirm if the logo is correctly encoded and sent as a string?
services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_logo_branding.go (1)
17-19: Isassets.LogoBrandinga valid PNG image?Could you please confirm if
assets.LogoBrandingis a valid PNG image? How is it being ensured?services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/create_jwt.go (1)
20-20: Iss.JWT_CERTIFICATEsecurely managed?Could you please confirm if
s.JWT_CERTIFICATEis securely managed and stored? How is it being protected?services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/secret/+layout.server.ts (2)
5-26: Is there proper error handling for thefetchcall?Could you please confirm if there is proper error handling for the
fetchcall? What happens if the fetch fails?
7-9: Is the JWT validation secure?Is the JWT validation secure? How is it being ensured that the JWT is not tampered with?
services/backend/src/resources/general/http/asset_gopher_coffee.go (1)
18-20: Isassets.GopherCoffeevalid GIF data?Could you please confirm that
assets.GopherCoffeecontains valid GIF data? If it is a file path, would it be better to useSendFileinstead ofSendString?services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/interface.go (2)
15-15: Is this type alias necessary?The
SqlDatatype alias seems straightforward. Is there a specific reason for defining this alias instead of usingmap[string]interface{}directly?
11-13: Looks good to me!The
SetDebugModefunction is correctly implemented.services/backend/src/resources/user/http/http-models/self_information.go (1)
15-22: Looks good to me!The
NewSelfInformationModelfunction is correctly implemented.services/backend/src/resources/user/service/handler.go (3)
1-8: Are these imports necessary?The imports seem appropriate for the functionality provided. Could you confirm if all of them are being used?
Would you like me to check for unused imports?
10-18: Is this struct and constructor sufficient?The
UserServicestruct and its constructor seem correctly implemented. Do you think any additional fields or methods are needed?The code changes are approved.
20-24: Does this interface cover all necessary methods?The
AuthStorageInterfaceinterface methods seem appropriate for user authentication and authorization. Do you think any additional methods are needed?The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/general/http/ping_everything.go (1)
9-9: Is this change necessary?The change from "System Health-Check" to "System health-check" seems to be a stylistic choice to standardize the terminology. Do you think this improves clarity?
The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/service/get_user_self_information_by_id.go (1)
1-6: Are these imports necessary?The imports seem appropriate for the functionality provided. Could you confirm if all of them are being used?
Would you like me to check for unused imports?
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.server.ts (7)
1-2: Why is theredirectfunction imported from@sveltejs/kit?Is this the standard way to handle redirections in your project?
Could you confirm if this is the recommended approach for handling redirects in SvelteKit?
6-7: How are cookies being managed?Could you provide more context on how cookies are being managed in your application?
Is there a specific library or middleware handling cookies?
9-11: Why is a redirect to/loginperformed when the JWT is missing or empty?Is there a specific reason for choosing a 301 status code for the redirect?
Would a 302 status code be more appropriate for temporary redirects?
13-14: How isgetSelfInformationhandling the fetch and JWT token?Could you provide more details on the
getSelfInformationfunction and its error handling?Is there a possibility of improving error handling for the fetch request?
15-17: Why is a redirect to/loginperformed whenselfis undefined or null?Is there a specific reason for choosing a 301 status code for the redirect?
Would a 302 status code be more appropriate for temporary redirects?
19-19: Why is the profile picture URL hardcoded?Is there a plan to make the profile picture URL configurable or dynamic?
Would it be better to fetch the profile picture URL from the user data or a configuration file?
21-26: Could you explain the structure of the returned object?Is there a specific reason for structuring the returned object this way?
Would it be beneficial to include additional user information in the returned object?
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/create_user_login_identity.go (5)
8-8: Why is the function accepting a transaction as a parameter?Is there a specific reason for using a transaction in this function?
Would it be beneficial to provide an option to execute the function without a transaction?
9-9: Could you explain the structure of theuser_identitiestable?Is there a specific reason for choosing these column names and types?
Would it be beneficial to include additional columns for storing user identity information?
11-11: How is the SQL query being executed?Could you provide more details on the
tx.Execfunction and its error handling?Is there a possibility of improving error handling for the SQL query execution?
13-19: Why is a custom error being returned for SQL errors?Is there a specific reason for using custom errors in this function?
Would it be beneficial to use standard error handling for SQL errors?
21-21: Could you explain the return value of the function?Is there a specific reason for returning
nilwhen the function succeeds?Would it be beneficial to return additional information or a success message?
services/frontend/src/lib/api/user/get-self_information.ts (6)
1-2: Why is theSelfInformationtype imported from./models/SelfInformation?Is there a specific reason for defining the
SelfInformationtype in a separate file?Would it be beneficial to include the type definition in this file for better readability?
3-3: Could you explain the parameters of thegetSelfInformationfunction?Is there a specific reason for accepting a
fetchfunction and ajwtstring as parameters?Would it be beneficial to include additional parameters for better flexibility?
7-13: How is the fetch request being constructed?Could you provide more details on the API endpoint and the request headers?
Is there a possibility of improving the fetch request construction for better readability?
15-17: Why is an error being thrown when the network response is not ok?Is there a specific reason for handling network errors this way?
Would it be beneficial to include additional error handling for different types of network errors?
19-21: How is the response being parsed and handled?Could you provide more details on the response parsing and error handling?
Is there a possibility of improving the response parsing for better readability?
24-24: Could you explain the return value of the function?Is there a specific reason for returning the parsed response or
null?Would it be beneficial to include additional information in the return value for better flexibility?
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/get_userid_by_login.go (5)
1-7: Is the package declaration and imports appropriate?The package declaration and imports look good to me. Do you agree?
9-10: Is the function signature and variable declaration appropriate?The function signature and variable declaration look good to me. Do you agree?
11-13: Is the SQL query and execution appropriate?The SQL query and execution look good to me. Do you agree?
14-28: Is the error handling and custom error creation appropriate?The error handling and custom error creation look good to me. Do you agree?
29-32: Is the return statement appropriate?The return statement looks good to me. Do you agree?
services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/redirect.go (6)
1-11: Is the package declaration and imports appropriate?The package declaration and imports look good to me. Do you agree?
13-15: Is the function signature and variable declaration appropriate?The function signature and variable declaration look good to me. Do you agree?
16-21: Is the random byte generation and error handling appropriate?The random byte generation and error handling look good to me. Do you agree?
23-25: Is the state generation and redirect URL creation appropriate?The state generation and redirect URL creation look good to me. Do you agree?
26-31: Is the cookie creation and setting appropriate?The cookie creation and setting look good to me. Do you agree?
33-34: Is the redirect response appropriate?The redirect response looks good to me. Do you agree?
services/frontend/src/routes/+error.svelte (4)
1-3: Is the script tag and imports appropriate?The script tag and imports look good to me. Do you agree?
5-10: Is theonMountfunction and JWT check appropriate?The
onMountfunction and JWT check look good to me. Do you agree?
13-16: Is the HTML structure appropriate?The HTML structure looks good to me. Do you agree?
18-43: Are the CSS styles appropriate?The CSS styles look good to me. Do you agree?
services/backend/src/web-app/middlewares/authentication.go (5)
4-8: Is the new import statement forjwtServicenecessary for the JWT verification logic?The import statement seems appropriate for the new functionality.
The code changes are approved.
17-19: Is the error handling logic for missing JWT token appropriate?The logic seems correct as it returns a 401 Unauthorized response if the JWT token is not found.
The code changes are approved.
28-28: Is storing the user's UUID in the request context appropriate?The logic seems correct as it provides more relevant user information.
The code changes are approved.
30-30: Is callingc.Next()to proceed to the next middleware or handler appropriate?The logic seems correct as it ensures the request proceeds to the next middleware or handler.
The code changes are approved.
21-25: DoesjwtService.VerifyJWThandle all necessary checks for JWT verification?The verification logic seems appropriate. Please ensure that
jwtService.VerifyJWThandles all necessary checks.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the
jwtService.VerifyJWTfunction:services/backend/src/resources/auth/service/handler.go (4)
3-8: Are the new import statements necessary for the new functionality?The import statements seem appropriate.
The code changes are approved.
10-15: Is theAuthServicestruct definition appropriate for the new functionality?The struct definition seems correct.
The code changes are approved.
17-23: Would it be beneficial to initialize theuserfield in the constructor?Is there a reason for not initializing the
userfield in theNewAuthServiceconstructor as suggested in the previous review comment?
25-28: Is theAuthStorageInterfacedefinition appropriate for the new functionality?The interface definition seems correct.
The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/storage/create_user.go (5)
3-8: Are the new import statements necessary for the new functionality?The import statements seem appropriate.
The code changes are approved.
10-14: Is theCreateUserfunction definition appropriate for the new functionality?The function definition seems correct.
The code changes are approved.
17-22: Is theSqlDatastruct definition appropriate for the new functionality?The struct definition seems correct.
The code changes are approved.
26-28: Is the error handling logic forsql.ErrNoRowsappropriate?The logic seems correct as it returns a custom error for
sql.ErrNoRows.The code changes are approved.
34-34: Is the function return logic appropriate?The logic seems correct as it returns the user ID if no errors occur.
The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/http/self_information.go (1)
22-22: Could you please ensure type safety here?The type assertion
c.Locals("user-uuid").(string)could panic if the type is incorrect. Would you consider using a type check to avoid potential panics?services/backend/src/resources/user/http/self_permission.go (1)
22-22: Could you please ensure type safety here?The type assertion
c.Locals("user-uuid").(string)could panic if the type is incorrect. Would you consider using a type check to avoid potential panics?services/frontend/src/lib/theme/general.sass (3)
15-19: Great enhancement to the menu interface!The new styles for
.svelteui-Menu-bodyimprove the visual appeal and ensure compatibility across different browsers.
20-23: Nice usability improvement!The new styles for
.svelteui-MenuItem-rootprovide visual feedback during user interaction, enhancing usability.
24-28: Good emphasis on important buttons!The new styles for
div.red-button > button.svelteui-MenuItem-rootmake these buttons more visually distinct, emphasizing their importance in the UI.services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/get_user_by_id.go (2)
1-10: Imports look good!The imported packages are appropriate for the functionality provided in the file.
14-14: SQL query looks secure!The parameterized query prevents SQL injection and is appropriate for retrieving a user by ID.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/jwt/service/verify_jwt.go (1)
1-7: Imports look good!The imported packages are appropriate for the functionality provided in the file.
.env (6)
19-19: Could you please verify the URL?The variable
APP_AUTHORIZATION_OAUTH_AUTHORIZATION_URLprovides the URL for OAuth authorization. Ensure the URL is correct and accessible.
20-20: Could you please verify the URL?The variable
APP_AUTHORIZATION_OAUTH_TOKEN_URLprovides the URL for OAuth token retrieval. Ensure the URL is correct and accessible.
21-21: Could you please verify the URL?The variable
APP_AUTHORIZATION_OAUTH_REDIRECT_URLprovides the URL for OAuth redirection. Ensure the URL is correct and accessible.
22-22: Could you please verify the URL?The variable
APP_AUTHORIZATION_OAUTH_USERINFO_URLprovides the URL for OAuth user information retrieval. Ensure the URL is correct and accessible.
23-23: Could you please verify the URL?The variable
APP_AUTHORIZATION_OAUTH_LOGOUT_URLprovides the URL for OAuth logout. Ensure the URL is correct and accessible.
15-15: Could you please verify all references to the renamed variable?The variable
APP_SECURITY_JWT_SECREThas been renamed toAPP_AUTHORIZATION_JWT_SECRET. Make sure all references to the old variable name are updated throughout the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of the renamed variable:
Verification successful
Renaming Verified Successfully
It looks like all references to
APP_SECURITY_JWT_SECREThave been updated toAPP_AUTHORIZATION_JWT_SECRETthroughout the codebase. Everything seems to be in order!Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the renamed variable. # Test: Search for the old variable name. Expect: No occurrences. rg --type env 'APP_SECURITY_JWT_SECRET'Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the renamed variable across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the old variable name in all files. Expect: No occurrences. rg 'APP_SECURITY_JWT_SECRET'Length of output: 28
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_test.go (2)
12-26: Could you please ensure all edge cases are covered?The function
TestHttpDatabaseErrorHandlingis well-implemented and covers the expected behavior. Ensure all edge cases are covered.
28-40: Could you please ensure all edge cases are covered?The function
TestHttpInternalServerErrorHandlingis well-implemented and covers the expected behavior. Ensure all edge cases are covered.services/frontend/src/lib/components/Sidebar/sidebar.svelte (4)
1-6: Great choice using TypeScript!Using TypeScript enhances type safety and developer experience. Importing
SelfInformationensures that theuserprop is correctly typed.The code changes are approved.
7-7: Nice addition of theuserprop!Exporting the
userprop allows it to be passed to child components, enhancing the functionality of theSidebarcomponent.The code changes are approved.
15-16: Great enhancement toSidebarAccount!Passing the
userprop toSidebarAccountenhances its capability to display user-related information dynamically.The code changes are approved.
38-39: Nice addition of CSS classes!Adding these CSS classes improves the layout and styling of the sidebar, providing a more consistent user interface.
The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/package.json (1)
36-36: Good choice addingky!Adding
kyas a dependency suggests an intention to improve HTTP request handling. It offers features like better error handling, request cancellation, and a streamlined API.The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/web-app/routes.go (4)
7-7: Good addition of middleware import!Importing middlewares suggests that they are used for route protection or other purposes.
The code changes are approved.
20-22: Nice addition of asset routes!Adding these routes allows the application to serve static content or images.
The code changes are approved.
26-31: Great enhancement of OAuth routes and middleware usage!Adding these routes enhances the authentication flow, allowing for user redirection, callback handling, and logout functionality. Using middleware ensures that all subsequent routes within the group require authentication.
The code changes are approved.
47-51: Nice addition of theTestEPfunction!The
TestEPfunction returns a simple JSON response, indicating that the application is functioning correctly.The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/handler.go (4)
12-14: Looks good!The
UserStoretype and its constructor function are correctly implemented. Is there any specific reason for not including any other fields inUserStore?The code changes are approved.
Also applies to: 16-20
30-35: Looks good!The
Scanfunction for thePermissiontype is correctly implemented. Is there any specific reason for not handling other types of values?The code changes are approved.
38-41: Looks good!The
ToServiceModelfunction is correctly implemented. Is there any specific reason for not including other fields in the conversion?The code changes are approved.
44-51: Looks good!The
PermissionsToStringArrayfunction is correctly implemented. Is there any specific reason for not handling empty slices differently?The code changes are approved.
services/backend/src/resources/user/storage/get_user_permissions_by_id.go (1)
11-15: Looks good!The
PermissionandUserPermissionstypes are correctly implemented. Is there any specific reason for not including other fields inUserPermissions?The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/handler.go (2)
17-38: Should we validate the parameters?Would it be beneficial to add validation for the parameters being passed to
NewAuthServiceto ensure they are not empty or invalid?Could you please confirm if parameter validation is handled elsewhere or if it should be added here?
41-46: Is error handling consistent?Are there any guidelines or best practices for ensuring consistent error handling across different implementations of
AuthStorageInterface?Could you please confirm if there are any specific error handling practices to follow for this interface?
services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/2_add_user.up.sql (5)
1-1: Should we define ENUM values?Is it necessary to define the ENUM values for
identity_providertype here, or are they defined elsewhere?Could you please confirm if the ENUM values are defined in a different part of the codebase?
2-2: Could there be conflicts with existing values?Is there a risk of conflict with existing values when adding
Authentikto theenum_type?Could you please confirm if there are any existing values that might conflict with
Authentik?
4-10: Are the column constraints appropriate?Are the constraints defined for the columns in the
userstable appropriate for ensuring data integrity?Could you please confirm if the constraints are sufficient for maintaining data integrity?
12-19: Is the foreign key constraint appropriate?Is the foreign key constraint defined for the
user_identitiestable appropriate for ensuring referential integrity?Could you please confirm if the foreign key constraint is sufficient for maintaining referential integrity?
21-41: Are the constraints appropriate?Are the constraints defined for the
user_sessionstable appropriate for ensuring data integrity and preventing session hijacking?Could you please confirm if the constraints are sufficient for maintaining data integrity and preventing session hijacking?
services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/en.json (4)
28-28: Is the description clear and accurate?Does the description for
device_descriptionaccurately convey the information about local device settings stored via cookies?Could you please confirm if the description is clear and accurate?
42-42: Is the information accurate and up-to-date?Does the entry for
this-website-templateprovide accurate and relevant information about the website template?Could you please confirm if the information is accurate and up-to-date?
43-43: Is the information clear and legally accurate?Does the entry for
using-template-liableprovide clear and legally accurate information about the liability of using the template?Could you please confirm if the information is clear and legally accurate?
44-44: Is the information accurate and up-to-date?Does the entry for
project-on-githubprovide accurate and relevant information about the project on GitHub?Could you please confirm if the information is accurate and up-to-date?
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database_transaction_begin_failed.go (6)
24-35: Is the error context data handled correctly?The method initializes a new
DatabaseTransactionBeginErrorwith relevant details. Could you confirm that the error context data is properly handled throughout the application?The code changes are approved.
38-39: Is the error message sufficient?The method returns the error message. Is the error message sufficient for debugging purposes?
The code changes are approved.
42-43: Is the error identifier sufficient?The method returns the error identifier. Is the error identifier sufficient for categorizing the error?
The code changes are approved.
46-51: Is thedebugModeflag properly managed?The method returns the HTTP error details and uses a
debugModeflag to determine the level of detail in the error message. Could you confirm that thedebugModeflag is properly managed and that sensitive information is not exposed in production?The code changes are approved.
54-55: Is the logging format consistent?The method returns the error details for logging purposes. Could you confirm that the logging format is consistent with the rest of the application?
The code changes are approved.
1-56: Is the overall structure well-organized?The file defines a custom error type with relevant methods for error handling, HTTP error responses, and logging. Is the overall structure well-organized and consistent with best practices?
The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database_transaction_commit_failed.go (6)
24-35: Is the error context data handled correctly?The method initializes a new
DatabaseTransactionCommitErrorwith relevant details. Could you confirm that the error context data is properly handled throughout the application?The code changes are approved.
38-39: Is the error message sufficient?The method returns the error message. Is the error message sufficient for debugging purposes?
The code changes are approved.
42-43: Is the error identifier sufficient?The method returns the error identifier. Is the error identifier sufficient for categorizing the error?
The code changes are approved.
46-51: Is thedebugModeflag properly managed?The method returns the HTTP error details and uses a
debugModeflag to determine the level of detail in the error message. Could you confirm that thedebugModeflag is properly managed and that sensitive information is not exposed in production?The code changes are approved.
54-55: Is the logging format consistent?The method returns the error details for logging purposes. Could you confirm that the logging format is consistent with the rest of the application?
The code changes are approved.
1-56: Is the overall structure well-organized?The file defines a custom error type with relevant methods for error handling, HTTP error responses, and logging. Is the overall structure well-organized and consistent with best practices?
The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/lib/stores/darkmode.ts (5)
37-48: Does the method handle edge cases?The method checks for a theme cookie and uses the browser's media query to determine the user's preferred color scheme if the cookie is absent or null. Does the method handle edge cases, such as invalid cookie values or unsupported media queries?
The code changes are approved.
49-51: Is the method implementation sufficient?The method sets the theme cookie to light mode and updates the theme store. Is the method implementation sufficient for setting the light mode?
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
52-54: Is the method implementation sufficient?The method sets the theme cookie to dark mode and updates the theme store. Is the method implementation sufficient for setting the dark mode?
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
17-23: Does the method handle edge cases?The method toggles the theme between light mode and dark mode based on the current theme cookie value. Does the method handle edge cases, such as invalid cookie values?
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-54: Is the overall structure well-organized?The file defines a
ThemeStoreclass with methods for managing theme settings. TheautoChangeThemefunction has been commented out. Is the overall structure well-organized and consistent with best practices?The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/lib/i18n/de.json (2)
27-27: Could you clarify the persistence of settings?The new entry provides clarity regarding the persistence of settings, emphasizing that these preferences will be stored as cookies specific to the device being used. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
41-43: Are these legal entries sufficient for transparency?The new entries enhance legal transparency, informing users about the template's origin, the licensing implications, and where to find the project on GitHub. Do you think these entries are sufficient for legal transparency?
The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_internal_server.go (4)
46-48: Is the error message returned correctly?The method returns the error message. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
50-52: Is the error identifier returned correctly?The method returns the error identifier. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
54-60: Does the method handle debug mode correctly?The method correctly handles debug mode and non-debug mode scenarios. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
62-64: Is the detailed error information returned correctly?The method returns detailed error information for logging. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/settings/+page.svelte (3)
32-32: Does the new<span>element provide clarity?The new
<span>element provides additional context to the user regarding device-specific settings. Is this the intended behavior?The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
43-43: Is the removal of the description property intentional?The removal of the description property suggests a design decision to streamline the interface. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
61-63: Do the new CSS rules enhance readability?The new CSS rules ensure that the description is visually distinct and properly spaced from the header. Is this the intended behavior?
The code changes are approved.
services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database_not_found.go (6)
12-25: Are all fields necessary and used correctly?The struct
DatabaseNotFoundErrorhas several fields. Are all of them necessary and used correctly in the code?
27-41: Is thesqlDataparameter type defined and used correctly?The function
NewDatabaseNotFoundErrorinitializes a newDatabaseNotFoundError. Is thesqlDataparameter type defined and used correctly in the code?
44-46: Is the error message returned correctly?The function
Errorreturns the error message. Is this the intended behavior?
48-50: Is the error identifier returned correctly?The function
ErrorTypereturns the error identifier. Is this the intended behavior?
52-57: Is thedebugModevariable defined and used correctly?The function
HttpErrorreturns the HTTP error details. Is thedebugModevariable defined and used correctly in the code?
60-67: Are the error details for logging returned correctly?The function
LoggerErrorreturns the error details for logging. Is this the intended behavior?services/go_app_modules/basic-utils/customerrors/err_database.go (6)
12-25: Are all fields necessary and used correctly?The struct
DatabaseErrorhas several fields. Are all of them necessary and used correctly in the code?
28-43: Is thesqlDataparameter type defined and used correctly?The function
NewDatabaseErrorinitializes a newDatabaseError. Is thesqlDataparameter type defined and used correctly in the code?
46-48: Is the error message returned correctly?The function
Errorreturns the error message. Is this the intended behavior?
50-52: Is the error identifier returned correctly?The function
ErrorTypereturns the error identifier. Is this the intended behavior?
54-59: Is thedebugModevariable defined and used correctly?The function
HttpErrorreturns the HTTP error details. Is thedebugModevariable defined and used correctly in the code?
62-70: Are the error details for logging returned correctly?The function
LoggerErrorreturns the error details for logging. Is this the intended behavior?Makefile (1)
6-6: Are the additional services necessary and configured correctly?The
devtarget has been modified to include two additional services:authentik-serverandauthentik-worker. Are these services necessary and configured correctly in the development environment?services/frontend/src/lib/theme/variables.scss (6)
7-8: Can you confirm the usage of these new color variables?The new color variables for red shades look good. Are they being used in other parts of the codebase?
10-10: What prompted the change in the background color?The adjustment from
#ebebebto#efefeflooks good. Was this change made to improve visual contrast?
17-28: Can you provide more context on the new sidebar color variables?The new and modified sidebar color variables look good. Could you provide more context on how these changes improve the sidebar design?
35-36: Is there a specific reason for retaining the red color variables in dark mode?The retention of the same red color variables in dark mode ensures consistency. Is there a specific reason for this decision?
45-48: How do these changes impact the sidebar's visibility in dark mode?The new sidebar color variables in dark mode look good. How do these changes impact the sidebar's visibility and aesthetic?
57-66: Are the old sidebar color variables still needed?The old sidebar color variables have been commented out. Are they still needed for reference, or can they be removed?
services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarAccount/sidebar-account.svelte (3)
2-7: Can you confirm the source ofSelfInformation?The import of
SelfInformationand the newuserprop look good. Can you confirm thatSelfInformationis correctly defined and imported?
10-33: Can you verify the dynamic rendering of user-specific data?The modifications to the HTML structure to incorporate the
userprop look good. Can you verify that the dynamic rendering of user-specific data works as expected?
58-76: Can you confirm the responsiveness of the new CSS rules?The new CSS rules for the account name section look good. Can you confirm that these changes ensure clear and responsive presentation of the display name and username?
services/backend/src/migrator/migration-files/3_add_permissions.up.sql (5)
1-7: Can you explain theCHECKconstraint oninherit_from?The creation of the
rolestable looks good. Can you explain the purpose of theCHECKconstraint oninherit_from?
9-15: Can you explain theCHECKconstraint onidentifier?The creation of the
permissionstable looks good. Can you explain the purpose of theCHECKconstraint onidentifier?
17-23: Can you confirm the foreign key relationships?The creation of the
role_permissionstable looks good. Can you confirm that the foreign key relationships are correctly defined?
25-31: Can you confirm the foreign key relationships?The creation of the
user_rolestable looks good. Can you confirm that the foreign key relationships are correctly defined?
33-62: Can you explain the recursive query in the function?The creation of the
get_user_permissionsfunction looks good. Can you explain the purpose and logic of the recursive query in the function?services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/callback.go (1)
81-87: Looks good to me!The function is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarNavigation/navigation.svelte (6)
1-1: Looks good to me!The change to TypeScript improves type safety and maintainability.
The code changes are approved.
2-2: Looks good to me!The import of the
pagestore is necessary for reactive updates based on the current page.The code changes are approved.
3-3: Looks good to me!The import of the type definition improves type inference and maintainability.
The code changes are approved.
4-4: Looks good to me!The import of the
_function is necessary for internationalization.The code changes are approved.
5-5: Looks good to me!The import of the
slidetransition enhances the user experience by animating the appearance of sub-elements.The code changes are approved.
28-30: Looks good to me!The function correctly determines the active navigation element.
The code changes are approved.
services/backend/go.mod (4)
10-10: Has the integration been tested?The new dependency
github.com/uvulpos/go-svelte/authentication-apihas been added. Have you tested its integration to ensure it works as expected?
16-16: Is the local path verified?The
replacedirective forgithub.com/uvulpos/go-svelte/authentication-apipoints to a local path. Have you verified that this path is correct and accessible?
29-29: Has the integration been tested?The new dependency
github.com/golang-jwt/jwthas been added. Have you tested its integration to ensure it works as expected?
50-50: Has the integration been tested?The new dependency
golang.org/x/oauth2has been added. Have you tested its integration to ensure it works as expected?services/frontend/src/routes/(app)/+layout.svelte (4)
8-8: Has thedatavariable been tested?The
datavariable has been added to hold page-specific data. Have you tested its integration within the component?
51-51: Has the theme detection been tested?The
themeStore.isThemeSetOrAutoDetect(window)call has been added to theonMountfunction. Have you tested its functionality to ensure it correctly sets or detects the theme?
53-58: Has the URL cleanup logic been tested?The URL cleanup logic has been added to remove the
refresh-hashparameter. Have you tested its functionality to ensure it works as expected?
65-65: Has theselfInformationreactive statement been tested?The
selfInformationreactive statement has been added to extract user information from thedataprop. Have you tested its functionality to ensure it works as expected?devops/docker-compose/dev-dependencies/docker-compose.authentik.yaml (2)
58-58: Has theAUTHENTIK_BOOTSTRAP_EMAILvariable been tested?The
AUTHENTIK_BOOTSTRAP_EMAILenvironment variable has been added. Have you tested its integration within the Authentik service?
59-60: Have theAUTHENTIK_BOOTSTRAP_PASSWORDandAUTHENTIK_BOOTSTRAP_TOKENvariables been tested?The
AUTHENTIK_BOOTSTRAP_PASSWORDandAUTHENTIK_BOOTSTRAP_TOKENenvironment variables have been added. Have you tested their integration within the Authentik service?Also applies to: 96-97
services/backend/src/configuration/variables.go (4)
11-11: Is the change to port 443 for HTTPS?Changing the port to
443indicates a shift towards HTTPS. This is a good practice for secure communication. Have you ensured that the necessary certificates are in place?
16-16: Is the commented-out line for local development?The commented-out line suggests a potential default value for local development. This can be useful for developers. Is this the intended purpose?
24-32: Are the new OAuth variables for integrating OAuth authentication?The new variables are essential for integrating OAuth authentication. They provide the necessary keys and URLs for client authentication and user information retrieval. Have you tested the OAuth flow with these variables?
34-42: Are the new certificate variables for managing identity information?The new variables are designed to hold identity information for certificates. This is critical for establishing secure connections and ensuring trust in the application’s identity. Have you ensured that these variables are correctly set in the environment?
docker-compose.dev.yaml (1)
1-3: Is the uncommented inclusion of the external YAML file for authentication services?Uncommenting the inclusion of the external YAML file indicates that authentication-related services are now being utilized in the development environment. This change is crucial for testing OAuth login functionality. Have you verified that the services defined in the external YAML file are correctly configured?
services/backend/src/web-app/app.go (7)
20-36: Are the new import statements for modularizing authentication and user management?The new imports indicate a shift towards a more modular architecture that separates concerns related to authentication and user management from general services. Have you ensured that these modules are correctly integrated and tested?
40-42: Are the new fields in theAppstruct for handling authentication and user requests?The addition of
AuthHandlerandUserHandlerenhances the application's ability to handle authentication and user-related requests. Have you ensured that these handlers are correctly initialized and used?
56-83: Is theNewAppfunction updated to instantiate new handlers?The
NewAppfunction now creates instances ofauthServiceanduserService, which are initialized with their respective storage components. This ensures that the new handlers are correctly set up. Have you tested the initialization process to ensure it works as expected?
134-141: Is the commented-out code inRunAppfor future TLS implementation?The commented-out code suggests a consideration for future security enhancements. This indicates a forward-thinking approach to improving the application's security. Have you planned when to implement this feature?
91-92: Is the version change from1.0to0.1intentional?The change in version number might indicate a rollback or a reversion to an earlier stage of development. Could you please clarify the reason for this change?
Line range hint
144-166: Is theReturnAppInE2EModemethod for end-to-end testing?The new method appears to set up the application in a mode suitable for end-to-end testing. Have you tested this method to ensure it works as expected?
Line range hint
109-109: Is thecreateRoutesmethod call for setting up routes?Calling
createRoutesensures that the application's routes are set up correctly in both modes. Have you verified that all necessary routes are included?Also applies to: 156-156
services/backend/src/resources/user/service/models/model_user_permissions.go
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/logout.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/backend/src/resources/user/service/get_user_permissions_by_id.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/userinfo_model.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback_authentik.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback_authentik.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback_authentik.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback_authentik.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
services/go_app_modules/authentication-api/ressources/auth/service/callback_authentik.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@coderabbitai review |
Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/logout.go (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarNavigation/navigation.svelte (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/lib/theme/variables.scss (1 hunks)
- services/frontend/src/routes/(authentication)/logout/+page.server.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- services/backend/src/resources/auth/http/logout.go
- services/frontend/src/lib/components/SidebarNavigation/navigation.svelte
- services/frontend/src/lib/theme/variables.scss
Additional comments not posted (4)
services/frontend/src/routes/(authentication)/logout/+page.server.ts (4)
1-1: Is the import statement correct?The import statement for
redirectfrom@sveltejs/kitlooks good to me. Is this the intended module for handling redirects in your application?
3-3: Is the type import correct?The type import for
LayoutServerLoadseems appropriate. Is this the correct type for theloadfunction in your application?
4-6: Is the commented-out line intentional?I noticed that the line for deleting the "jwt" cookie is commented out. Is this intentional for debugging purposes, or should it be removed or uncommented for production?
4-6: Is the redirect implementation correct?The redirect to the OAuth logout endpoint looks good. Is this the intended behavior for handling logouts in your application?
| id UUID DEFAULT uuid_generate_v4() PRIMARY KEY, | ||
| name VARCHAR UNIQUE NOT NULL, | ||
| inherit_from UUID, | ||
| FOREIGN KEY (inherit_from) REFERENCES roles(id) ON DELETE SET NULL, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
could be also an array, to inherit from multiple roles (like an admin)
|
@coderabbitai full review |
Actions performedFull review triggered. |
|
JWT is now only 10 Minutes valid. After that a refresh token must be used. This increases the load of the server, but improves security and fasten permission changes |
|
@coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. @uvulpos, here are the interesting statistics about the repository: Let me know if you need any further analysis! Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Count the number of authors in the repository.
authors=$(git shortlog -sn --all | wc -l)
# Count the total number of lines of code in the repository.
lines_of_code=$(tokei --output json | jq '.total.code')
# Count the number of commits in the repository.
commits=$(git rev-list --all --count)
# Count the number of files in the repository.
files=$(git ls-files | wc -l)
# Count the number of TODO comments in the codebase.
todos=$(rg -i 'TODO' | wc -l)
# Output the results as a table.
echo -e "Metric\t\t\tValue"
echo -e "-----------------------------------"
echo -e "Number of Authors\t$authors"
echo -e "Lines of Code\t\t$lines_of_code"
echo -e "Number of Commits\t$commits"
echo -e "Number of Files\t\t$files"
echo -e "TODO Comments\t\t$todos"
Length of output: 617 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Output the raw tokei JSON data for inspection.
tokei --output json
Length of output: 55497 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Sum the total lines of code across all languages in the tokei JSON output.
lines_of_code=$(tokei --output json | jq 'reduce .[] as $item (0; . + $item.code)')
# Output the results as a table.
echo -e "Metric\t\t\tValue"
echo -e "-----------------------------------"
echo -e "Total Lines of Code\t$lines_of_code"
Length of output: 284 |
|
@coderabbitai read the files in this pr and generate test cases for this pr and document them in Markdown |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. Test Cases for OAuth Login PRBackend Authentication and OAuth Handling
JWT Handling
User Management
Frontend Components
Configuration and Environment Setup
These test cases cover the critical areas of the OAuth login functionality, JWT handling, user management, frontend components, and configuration setup. They are designed to ensure that the new features work as expected and handle edge cases gracefully. Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# List all the files that have been modified or added in this PR.
git diff --name-only origin/main
Length of output: 7030 |
|
Todos:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Chores