refactor: filter types for logs page #2878
Conversation
ogzhanolguncu
requested review from
perkinsjr,
chronark and
mcstepp
as code owners
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request refactors the logs filtering functionality across the dashboard. The changes update various import paths and type definitions by replacing older types and enums (e.g. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant LogsSearch
participant LLMService
participant FilterUtil
User->>LogsSearch: Triggers search (via UI/shortcut)
LogsSearch->>LLMService: queryLLMForStructuredOutput()
LLMService-->>LogsSearch: Returns structured output
LogsSearch->>FilterUtil: transformStructuredOutputToFilters()
FilterUtil-->>LogsSearch: Validated filter schema
LogsSearch-->>User: Updates filter display
sequenceDiagram
participant Component
participant useFiltersHook
participant QueryParser
Component->>useFiltersHook: updateFilters(newFilters)
useFiltersHook->>QueryParser: parseAsFilterValArray(new filter values)
QueryParser-->>useFiltersHook: Parsed LogsFilterValue[]
useFiltersHook-->>Component: Active filters updated
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (3)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-refresh.tsx (1)
21-34: Consider using async/await and proper error handling.The setTimeout usage could be replaced with a more robust solution.
- const handleSwitch = () => { + const handleSwitch = async () => { const isLiveBefore = Boolean(isLive); setIsLoading(true); - toggleLive(false); - logs.queryLogs.invalidate(); - logs.queryTimeseries.invalidate(); - - setTimeout(() => { + try { + toggleLive(false); + await Promise.all([ + logs.queryLogs.invalidate(), + logs.queryTimeseries.invalidate() + ]); + await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 1000)); setIsLoading(false); if (isLiveBefore) { toggleLive(true); } - }, 1000); + } catch (error) { + setIsLoading(false); + console.error('Failed to refresh logs:', error); + } };apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-bookmarked-filters.ts (2)
31-41: Remove @ts-expect-error by improving type safety.The code uses multiple @ts-expect-error comments which should be addressed with proper typing.
- if (["startTime", "endTime", "since"].includes(field)) { - //@ts-expect-error fix later - acc[field] = value; - } else { - if (!acc[field]) { - //@ts-expect-error fix later - acc[field] = []; - } - //@ts-expect-error fix later - acc[field].push({ value, operator }); - } + type TimeField = "startTime" | "endTime" | "since"; + if (isTimeField(field)) { + acc[field as TimeField] = value; + } else { + const arrayField = field as keyof Omit<QuerySearchParams, TimeField>; + if (!acc[arrayField]) { + acc[arrayField] = []; + } + (acc[arrayField] as FilterUrlValue[]).push({ value, operator }); + } +// Add this helper function +function isTimeField(field: string): field is TimeField { + return ["startTime", "endTime", "since"].includes(field); +}
84-100: Add type guard for status field check.The type casting for the status field can be replaced with a type guard for better type safety.
+ const isStatusField = (field: string): field is "status" => field === "status"; (value as FilterUrlValue[]).forEach((filter) => { reconstructedFilters.push({ id: crypto.randomUUID(), field: field as LogsFilterField, operator: filter.operator, value: filter.value, metadata: - field === "status" + isStatusField(field) ? { colorClass: logsFilterFieldConfig.status.getColorClass?.( filter.value as number, ), } : undefined, }); });
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/structured-output-schema-generator.ts (1)
41-60: Consider stricter validation for unrecognized field types.
If a field type fails the string/number checks, the function defaults to returning true. This might allow invalid field types or incompatible values to pass silently.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/hooks/use-filters.ts (1)
78-132: updateFilters function is logically correct but could benefit from more robust typing.
Grouping filters by field is straightforward, but some type constraints (e.g., preventing assignment of string values to numeric-based filters) might further improve reliability.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-filters.ts (2)
16-21: Initialization of parseAsFilterValArray.
Defining parseAsFilterValArray with string-based operators ("is", "contains", "startsWith", "endsWith") is good for text-based fields. If future numeric or date-based operators are added, consider a separate parser variant.
116-120: Grouping filter arrays by field.
Creating dedicated arrays for each filter field is clear. However, you might reduce duplication by dynamically grouping them (e.g., grouping by filter.field in a single pass). If adding many fields, a more generic approach could improve maintainability.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/methods-filter.tsx (1)
3-7: Consider using a union type for better type safety.While using
stringworks, consider defining a union type of HTTP methods for better type safety and autocomplete support:+type HttpMethod = "GET" | "POST" | "PUT" | "DELETE" | "PATCH"; + type MethodOption = { id: number; - method: string; + method: HttpMethod; checked: boolean; };apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/nuqs-parsers.ts (1)
29-57: Consider adding input validation for empty values.The implementation handles null inputs and invalid operators well, but it might allow empty values after the operator.
const [operator, val] = item.split(/:(.+)/); -if (!operators.includes(operator as TOperator)) { +if (!operators.includes(operator as TOperator) || !val) { throw new Error("Invalid operator"); }apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/filter.types.ts (1)
36-49: Consider making metadata type more specific.The metadata type could be more specific to prevent potential type errors.
metadata?: { colorClass?: string; - icon?: ReactNode; + icon?: Exclude<ReactNode, null | undefined | boolean | number>; };apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/filters.schema.ts (3)
35-35: Simplify color class logic using object literal.The ternary operator can be replaced with a more maintainable object literal lookup.
- getColorClass: (value) => (value === "blocked" ? "bg-warning-9" : "bg-success-9"), + getColorClass: (value) => ({ + blocked: "bg-warning-9", + passed: "bg-success-9", + }[value]),
31-36: Add type validation for status values.The
validValuesarray should be typed to ensure it matches the possible values in thegetColorClassfunction.+ type StatusValue = "blocked" | "passed"; status: { type: "string", operators: ["is"], - validValues: ["blocked", "passed"], + validValues: ["blocked", "passed"] as StatusValue[], getColorClass: (value) => (value === "blocked" ? "bg-warning-9" : "bg-success-9"), } as const,
68-81: Consider adding JSDoc comments for exported types.The exported types lack documentation. Adding JSDoc comments would improve code maintainability.
+/** Represents the URL-safe version of a rate limit filter value */ export type RatelimitFilterUrlValue = Pick< FilterValue<RatelimitFilterField, RatelimitFilterOperator>, "value" | "operator" >; +/** Represents a complete rate limit filter value with all properties */ export type RatelimitFilterValue = FilterValue<RatelimitFilterField, RatelimitFilterOperator>; +/** Represents the structure of query parameters for rate limit searches */ export type RatelimitQuerySearchParams = { startTime?: number | null; endTime?: number | null; since?: string | null; identifiers: RatelimitFilterUrlValue[] | null; requestIds: RatelimitFilterUrlValue[] | null; status: RatelimitFilterUrlValue[] | null; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (42)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/charts/query-timeseries.schema.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/control-cloud/index.tsx(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-display/components/display-popover.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/filter-checkbox.tsx(3 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/filters-popover.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/hooks/use-checkbox-state.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/methods-filter.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/paths-filter.tsx(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/status-filter.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-live-switch.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-refresh.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-search/index.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/table/query-logs.schema.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/constants.ts(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters-schema.test.ts(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters.schema.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters.type.ts(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-bookmarked-filters.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-filters.test.ts(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-filters.ts(6 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-keyboard-shortcut.tsx(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/types.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/charts/query-timeseries.schema.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/control-cloud/index.tsx(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/filter-checkbox.tsx(3 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/hooks/use-checkbox-state.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/identifiers-filter.tsx(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-search/index.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/table/query-logs.schema.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/filters.schema.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/filters.type.ts(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/hooks/use-filters.test.ts(4 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/hooks/use-filters.ts(4 hunks)apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/filter.types.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/nuqs-parsers.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/structured-output-schema-generator.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/transform-structured-output-filter-format.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/type-guards.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search/utils.test.ts(0 hunks)apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search/utils.ts(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/llm-search/utils.test.ts(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/llm-search/utils.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/constants.ts
- apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search/utils.test.ts
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-filters.test.ts
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters-schema.test.ts
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-keyboard-shortcut.tsx
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/filters.type.ts
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters.type.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/types.ts
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-live-switch.tsx
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/filters-popover.tsx
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/status-filter.tsx
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-display/components/display-popover.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-bookmarked-filters.ts (1)
Learnt from: ogzhanolguncu
PR: unkeyed/unkey#2825
File: apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs-v2/hooks/use-bookmarked-filters.ts:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-30T20:51:44.359Z
Learning: The user (ogzhanolguncu) prefers to handle refactoring suggestions in separate PRs to maintain focus in the current PR.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/cache
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/clickhouse
- GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/encryption
- GitHub Check: Test Agent Local / test_agent_local
- GitHub Check: Test API / API Test Local
- GitHub Check: Build / Build
- GitHub Check: autofix
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (36)
apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/structured-output-schema-generator.ts (2)
5-9: Great use of generic parameters for flexibility.
This approach ensures the schema generation is adaptable for various field and operator enum configurations.
10-39: Ensure the field configuration is never undefined within .refine().
Currently, the code retrieves the field configuration but does not safeguard against a missing or undefined config. If the enum or configuration object ever becomes misaligned, an undefined config could cause undefined behavior.Would you like to add an explicit check to confirm that config is defined before checking config.operators?
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters.schema.ts (4)
11-56: Field configurations look structurally consistent.
This organized approach simplifies future expansions and ensures clarity.
58-62: StatusConfig extends NumberConfig correctly.
The validate function ensures that only valid status codes are allowed, which is good for data integrity.
78-82: filterOutputSchema creation aligns well with the new Enums.
The composition with createFilterOutputSchema is a clean pattern for consistent runtime validation.
99-114: Check QuerySearchParams for optional fields.
It's beneficial that numeric and string fields are nullable, but ensure the rest of your UI and logic handle these null cases gracefully.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/hooks/use-filters.ts (2)
16-16: parseAsFilterValArray usage is concise and clear.
Defining the allowed operators in one place helps maintain consistency.
56-58: Confirm type consistency for status color mapping.
If the status field is a number, ensure getColorClass can handle numeric input. Casting as string may lead to unexpected results or user confusion if the function expects numeric logic.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/hooks/use-filters.ts (7)
1-4: Imports look consistent.
The introduction of parseAsFilterValueArray and parseAsRelativeTime from "@/components/logs/validation/utils/nuqs-parsers" appears correct and consistent with the usage further down in the file.
7-14: Types imported for logs filtering.
Bringing in LogsFilterField, LogsFilterOperator, LogsFilterValue, and so on from "../filters.schema" aligns well with the specialized logs filtering. Just ensure that references to these types and configs remain consistent throughout.
23-27: Unified filter arrays in queryParamsPayload.
Assigning parseAsFilterValArray to multiple fields like requestId, host, methods, paths, and status is concise. If one of these fields should be numeric-only (e.g., status codes), double-check that string-based parse logic is intended. Otherwise, this is a clean approach.
37-37: Initialization of activeFilters array.
Declaring const activeFilters: LogsFilterValue[] = [] is straightforward and ensures type safety for the subsequent push operations.
44-44: Handling numeric status value.
• Line 44 merely pushes the raw value into the filter.
• Line 46 calls getColorClass with status.value cast as a number. Double-check that this cast is always valid (i.e., the status field is guaranteed to be numeric).Also applies to: 46-46
92-92: Force-casting field to LogsFilterField.
Casting field as LogsFilterField can mask real type mismatches. Confirm that only valid keys appear in the "startTime", "endTime", and "since" iteration.
103-103: updateFilters signature.
updateFilters accepting an array of LogsFilterValue clarifies usage and ensures all filter updates remain typed. This helps avoid passing in unintended filter structures.apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/type-guards.ts (1)
1-9: Well-structured type guards.
Both isNumberConfig and isStringConfig correctly refine the config object’s type field. This is a standard TypeScript approach to narrowing. No issues found.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/charts/query-timeseries.schema.ts (1)
2-2: Usage of ratelimitFilterOperatorEnum.
Switching to ratelimitFilterOperatorEnum for operator fields is consistent with the specialized rate limit filtering. Please verify that all operator references in related code have been updated to avoid mismatches or type errors.
[approve]Also applies to: 13-13
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/charts/query-timeseries.schema.ts (1)
2-2: Verify enum values compatibility.The change from
filterOperatorEnumtologsFilterOperatorEnumlooks good, but please ensure that all possible values inlogsFilterOperatorEnumare compatible with the existing filter operations.Also applies to: 12-12
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the values of old and new filter operator enums # Search for enum definitions echo "Searching for old and new enum definitions..." rg -A 10 "filterOperatorEnum|logsFilterOperatorEnum"Length of output: 7577
Final Verification: Enum Values Compatibility Confirmed
- The new enum "logsFilterOperatorEnum" is defined in "apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters.schema.ts" with the values ["is", "contains", "startsWith", "endsWith"].
- The old enum "filterOperatorEnum" in "apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/filter.types.ts" contains the identical set of values.
- Therefore, all values in "logsFilterOperatorEnum" are fully compatible with the existing filter operations.
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/table/query-logs.schema.ts (1)
2-2: Verify rate limit-specific operators.The change to use
ratelimitFilterOperatorEnumsuggests that rate limit filters might have different operators than log filters. Please ensure that this separation is intentional and document any differences between the two sets of operators.Also applies to: 14-14
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare logs and rate limit filter operators # Search for both enum definitions echo "Comparing logs and rate limit filter operators..." rg -A 10 "logsFilterOperatorEnum|ratelimitFilterOperatorEnum"Length of output: 14285
Verification: Rate Limit Operator Enums are Intentionally Separated
- The logs filter operator enum (defined in apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/filters.schema.ts) includes four operators: "is", "contains", "startsWith", and "endsWith".
- In contrast, the ratelimit filter operator enum (defined in apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/filters.schema.ts) restricts the valid operators to just "is" and "contains".
This discrepancy indicates an intentional design decision to limit rate limit filters to a subset of the operators used for log filters. If this separation is by design, it is recommended to document the rationale for the narrower set of operators in the rate limit filters for clarity.
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/table/query-logs.schema.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! Schema changes are consistent.The change to use
logsFilterOperatorEnummaintains consistency with other log-related schemas and aligns with the refactoring objectives.Also applies to: 13-13
apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/nuqs-parsers.ts (1)
5-25: LGTM! Well-implemented parser with proper error handling.The implementation correctly handles null inputs and validates relative time strings.
apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/filter.types.ts (1)
4-7: Consider adding validation for operator values.While using zod for enum validation is good, consider adding runtime validation to ensure operator values match the enum.
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if all operator usages match the enum values rg -A 2 "operator.*=.*['\"](?:is|contains|startsWith|endsWith)['\"]"Length of output: 962
Runtime Validation for Operator Values
The zod enum in filter.types.ts already performs runtime validation when used in a zod parsing context. Our grep search confirms that operator comparisons (e.g., checking for "is") consistently use the valid enum string values. If inputs are piped through zod—for example, using filterOperatorEnum.parse(input)—then operator values are validated at runtime. In cases where input isn’t processed through zod, adding an explicit runtime check might provide an extra layer of safety, but based on the usage we found, current implementations assume already validated input.
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/hooks/use-checkbox-state.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Type update aligns with the new filter schema.The change from
FilterValuetoLogsFilterValuemaintains type safety while aligning with the new filter schema.Also applies to: 6-6
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/hooks/use-checkbox-state.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Type update aligns with the new filter schema.The change from
FilterValuetoRatelimitFilterValuemaintains type safety while aligning with the new filter schema.Also applies to: 6-6
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/paths-filter.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Type safety improvements.The changes correctly update the filter type from generic
FilterValueto the more specificLogsFilterValue, improving type safety while maintaining the existing functionality.Also applies to: 40-40
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/filter-checkbox.tsx (1)
5-5: LGTM! Consistent type refactoring.The changes correctly update the filter types to use the more specific
RatelimitFilterValue, maintaining consistency with the broader refactoring effort.Also applies to: 24-24, 50-50
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/filter-checkbox.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM! Parallel type refactoring.The changes correctly update the filter types to use the more specific
LogsFilterValue, maintaining consistency with the parallel changes in the rate limits component.Also applies to: 24-24, 50-50
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/identifiers-filter.tsx (1)
6-6: LGTM! Import path and type updated correctly.The change from
FilterValuetoRatelimitFilterValuealigns with the broader refactoring to separate rate limit and logs filter types.apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/controls/components/logs-search/index.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Import paths updated correctly.The changes align with the broader refactoring effort to centralize utility functions and hooks.
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-search/index.tsx (1)
1-4: LGTM! Import paths updated correctly.The changes align with the broader refactoring effort to centralize utility functions and hooks.
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/llm-search/utils.ts (2)
1-25: LGTM! Import updated and documentation added.The change from
filterFieldConfigtoratelimitFilterFieldConfigaligns with the broader refactoring. The added JSDoc documentation with examples significantly improves code maintainability.
37-37: Verify the OpenAI model name.The model name "gpt-4o-mini" seems unusual. OpenAI's standard model names don't include a model called "gpt-4o-mini".
✅ Verification successful
🌐 Web query:
What are the available OpenAI GPT-4 model names?💡 Result:
Available OpenAI GPT-4 model names include several variants optimized for different use cases and deployment scenarios. Here's a structured breakdown: ### Core Models 1. **GPT-4 Turbo** - General Availability (GA) version: `gpt-4` with `turbo-2024-04-09` - Replaced older preview models: - `gpt-4` (`1106-Preview`, `0125-Preview`, `vision-preview`) [1][6] 2. **GPT-4o ("omni")** - Multimodal model handling text/images/audio: - Versions: `2024-11-20`, `2024-08-06`, `2024-05-13` [1][2][10] - Requires deployment in **standard** or **global-standard** Azure regions [1] 3. **GPT-4o mini** - Smaller, cost-efficient variant: - Version: `2024-07-18` (`gpt-4o-mini`) [1][4] --- ### Specialized Models **Realtime Beta (Preview)** - Real-time audio/text interaction via WebRTC/WebSocket: - `gpt-4o-realtime-preview` (versions: `2024-12-17`, `2024-10–01`) - `gpt–4o–mini–realtime–preview` (`2024–12–17`) [4] **Vision Capabilities** - Integrated into GPT‑4 Turbo as `gpt‑4‑turbo` via Chat Completions API [6] --- ### Deprecated/Historical Models - Early versions: `gpt‑40314`, `gpt‑41106-Preview` (phased out) [7][9] --- ### Access Requirements Models are accessible via: 1. **OpenAI API**: After $5+ payment (usage tier 1) [8] 2. **Azure OpenAI Service**: Requires resource deployment in supported regions [1][10] For developers, programmatic deployments use exact model+version identifiers like `gpt‑40` or `gpt‑40‑mini`[1][4]. Always verify regional availability and API documentation for compatibility updates. Citations: - 1: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/concepts/models?tabs=python-secure%2Cglobal-standard%2Cstandard-chat-completions&wt.mc_id=studentamb_264449 - 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4 - 3: https://gptforwork.com/guides/openai-gpt3-models - 4: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models - 5: https://openai.com/product/gpt-4/ - 6: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8555496-gpt-4-vision-api - 7: https://community.openai.com/t/cant-find-and-use-gpt-4-model-i-have-the-gpt-4-invitation/137192 - 8: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7102672-how-can-i-access-gpt-4-gpt-4-turbo-gpt-4o-and-gpt-4o-mini - 9: https://community.openai.com/t/what-do-the-numbers-on-gpt-models-actually-mean/623711 - 10: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/whats-new
Verification Result: The "gpt-4o-mini" model name is valid.
The web query confirms that "gpt-4o-mini" is an available variant of the GPT-4 series, specifically a smaller and cost-efficient model introduced on 2024-07-18. Based on this information, the code snippet using "gpt-4o-mini" is correct and does not require any changes.
- File: apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/ratelimit/llm-search/utils.ts, line 37 uses a valid OpenAI model name.
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/components/control-cloud/index.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! The type changes improve separation of concerns.The changes correctly separate rate limit filter types from general filter types, making the codebase more maintainable and type-safe. The absolute import path for
useKeyboardShortcutis also a good practice.Also applies to: 9-9, 47-47
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/control-cloud/index.tsx (1)
3-3: LGTM! The type changes maintain consistency with rate limits.The changes mirror those in the rate limits component, ensuring consistent type separation and import paths across the codebase.
Also applies to: 9-9, 60-60
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/ratelimits/[namespaceId]/logs/hooks/use-filters.test.ts (1)
1-4: LGTM! The validation utilities are now centralized.The changes correctly move parser functions to a centralized location, improving code organization. The test cases maintain their functionality while using the new utilities.
Also applies to: 10-10
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search/utils.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! The LLM search now uses logs-specific filter configuration.The changes correctly align the LLM search functionality with the new filter type separation, maintaining the same functionality while using the logs-specific configuration.
Also applies to: 77-77
apps/dashboard/components/logs/validation/utils/transform-structured-output-filter-format.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…types-for-logs-page
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search.ts (1)
90-159: Consider restricting the status code range.The function is well-implemented, but the status code range (100-599) might be too permissive. Consider restricting it to commonly used HTTP status codes to prevent invalid inputs.
- constraints = " and must be between 100-599"; + constraints = " and must be a valid HTTP status code (e.g., 200, 201, 400, 401, 403, 404, 500, 503)";
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/paths-filter.tsx(2 hunks)apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-search/index.tsx(1 hunks)apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-search/index.tsx
- apps/dashboard/app/(app)/logs/components/controls/components/logs-filters/components/paths-filter.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search.ts (3)
2-2: LGTM! Import statement correctly updated.The import statement has been properly updated to use the new
logsFilterFieldConfigas part of the filter types refactoring.
16-80: Well-implemented error handling and type safety.The function implementation is robust with:
- Comprehensive error handling for different scenarios
- Clear user-friendly error messages
- Proper rate limit handling
- Type safety through schema validation
23-23: Fix the OpenAI model name.The model name "gpt-4o-2024-08-06" appears to be incorrect. OpenAI model names typically follow the format "gpt-4-YYYY-MM-DD".
- model: "gpt-4o-2024-08-06", + model: "gpt-4-0613",✅ Verification successful
🌐 Web query:
What are the available OpenAI GPT-4 models that support function calling or JSON mode?💡 Result:
OpenAI's GPT-4 models with function calling and JSON mode support include:
Function Calling Support
These models enable API integration through structured JSON outputs:
gpt-4-0613
Original model supporting function calls viafunctionsparameter[1][7]gpt-4(1106-Preview/0125-Preview)
Enhanced parallel function calling viatoolsparameter[10]gpt-4o&gpt-4o-mini
Latest multimodal models with native tool/tool_choice implementation[9][10]JSON Mode Support
Models constrained to return valid JSON:
Model Key Features gpt-4(1106-Preview)Initial JSON schema enforcement[5][6] gpt-4oCombines JSON mode with vision/audio[9][5] gpt-4o-miniCompact version with JSON constraints[9][5] Both features require API version
2023-12-01-previewor newer[5][10]. For production use cases requiring strict schema validation, newergpt-4ovariants are recommended over legacy 0613/Preview models due to improved reliability[3][9].Citations:
- 1: https://blog.mlq.ai/gpt-function-calling-getting-started/
- 2: https://mattmazur.com/2023/11/07/experimenting-with-gpt-4-turbos-json-mode/
- 3: https://www.anyscale.com/blog/anyscale-endpoints-json-mode-and-function-calling-features
- 4: https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/blog/startupsatmicrosoftblog/how-to-use-azure-openai-gpt-4o-with-function-calling/4158612
- 5: https://learn.microsoft.com/vi-vn/azure/ai-services/openai/how-to/json-mode
- 6: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models
- 7: https://platform.openai.com/docs/guides/function-calling
- 8: https://community.openai.com/t/how-do-i-use-the-new-json-mode/475890/2
- 9: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/ai-services/openai/concepts/models?tabs=python-secure
- 10: https://learn.microsoft.com/da-dk/azure/ai-services/openai/how-to/function-calling
Fix the OpenAI model name.
The model name
"gpt-4o-2024-08-06"does not match any standardized naming pattern. OpenAI’s documentation and community resources indicate that stable function calling is supported with models like"gpt-4-0613", while the"gpt-4o"(without a date suffix) is used to reference the latest multimodal variants. To avoid API errors and ensure compatibility, it's recommended to replace the incorrect model name with a valid one—such as"gpt-4-0613"if function calling is the primary requirement.
- File:
apps/dashboard/lib/trpc/routers/logs/llm-search.ts
- Line 23: change
"gpt-4o-2024-08-06"to"gpt-4-0613"(or"gpt-4o"if multimodal support is intended)
What does this PR do?
WARNING: THIS SHOULD BE MERGED AFTER #2877
Fixes # (issue)
If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists
Type of change
How should this be tested?
Checklist
Required
pnpm buildpnpm fmtconsole.logsgit pull origin mainAppreciated
Summary by CodeRabbit