Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: sql injection vuln #2871

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025
Merged

fix: sql injection vuln #2871

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 5, 2025

Conversation

ogzhanolguncu
Copy link
Contributor

@ogzhanolguncu ogzhanolguncu commented Feb 5, 2025

What does this PR do?

Fixes # (issue)

If there is not an issue for this, please create one first. This is used to tracking purposes and also helps use understand why this PR exists

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Chore (refactoring code, technical debt, workflow improvements)
  • Enhancement (small improvements)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How should this be tested?

  • Test A
  • Test B

Checklist

Required

  • Filled out the "How to test" section in this PR
  • Read Contributing Guide
  • Self-reviewed my own code
  • Commented on my code in hard-to-understand areas
  • Ran pnpm build
  • Ran pnpm fmt
  • Checked for warnings, there are none
  • Removed all console.logs
  • Merged the latest changes from main onto my branch with git pull origin main
  • My changes don't cause any responsiveness issues

Appreciated

  • If a UI change was made: Added a screen recording or screenshots to this PR
  • Updated the Unkey Docs if changes were necessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Enhanced the log filtering process through dynamic, uniquely generated query parameters. These improvements streamline log searches and ensure more robust, flexible retrieval of log data for a smoother end-user experience.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 5, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: af836f3

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
dashboard ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 2:08pm
engineering ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 2:08pm
play ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 2:08pm
www ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 2:08pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes update two functions that construct query parameters by dynamically generating unique parameter names based on the index of each provided path. In both getLogs and getLogsTimeseriesWhereClause, a new parameter schema extension is introduced to incorporate these dynamic parameters. Additionally, the return types and function signatures have been updated to include the newly built parameter objects and extended schemas for query construction, ensuring the query functions now handle dynamically generated parameters.

Changes

File Change Summary
internal/.../logs.ts Updated getLogs and getLogsTimeseriesWhereClause functions to dynamically generate parameter names for path conditions. Function signatures now return extended parameter objects and query payloads.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Sequence Diagram for getLogs

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant getLogs
    participant ParamExt
    participant QueryBuilder

    Client->>getLogs: Call getLogs(args)
    getLogs->>ParamExt: Generate paramSchemaExtension (indexing args.paths)
    ParamExt-->>getLogs: Return extended parameters
    getLogs->>QueryBuilder: Build query with extended parameters
    QueryBuilder-->>getLogs: Return constructed query
    getLogs-->>Client: Return results with parameters object
Loading

Sequence Diagram for getLogsTimeseriesWhereClause

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant getLogsTs
    participant ParamExt
    participant QueryComposer

    Client->>getLogsTs: Call getLogsTimeseriesWhereClause(params, additionalConditions)
    getLogsTs->>ParamExt: Extend logsTimeseriesParams with dynamic path conditions
    ParamExt-->>getLogsTs: Return extended paramSchema
    getLogsTs->>QueryComposer: Construct whereClause using extended parameters
    QueryComposer-->>getLogsTs: Return whereClause
    getLogsTs-->>Client: Return { whereClause, paramSchema }
Loading

Suggested reviewers

  • mcstepp
  • perkinsjr
  • MichaelUnkey
  • chronark
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Thank you for following the naming conventions for pull request titles! 🙏

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
internal/clickhouse/src/logs.ts (3)

47-49: Use a more descriptive name or inline comment for paramSchemaExtension.
Currently, it’s clear that this object is meant to store additional zod parameters for dynamic paths. However, a more explicit naming convention or an inline comment could improve readability for future maintainers.


60-66: Check wildcard usage in like clause.
When using the contains operator with like(path, CONCAT('%', {paramName: String}, '%')), ensure that if a user includes wildcard symbols (%, _), the query matches the intended scope. You might need to escape special characters if you want a literal “contains”.


300-306: Similar concern with wildcard usage for timeseries paths.
As in getLogs, consider whether contains requires escaping special characters.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2277a95 and af836f3.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • internal/clickhouse/src/logs.ts (4 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (17)
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/rbac
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/nextjs
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/hono
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/cache
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./packages/api
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/clickhouse
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/resend
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/keys
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/id
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/hash
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/encryption
  • GitHub Check: Test Packages / Test ./internal/billing
  • GitHub Check: Test API / API Test Local
  • GitHub Check: Build / Build
  • GitHub Check: Test Agent Local / test_agent_local
  • GitHub Check: autofix
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
internal/clickhouse/src/logs.ts (13)

50-50: Good practice adding a dedicated comment.
Documenting the reason for dynamic path parameterization makes the code more maintainable and self-explanatory.


53-57: Prevent potential misuse of the operator property.
This logic effectively enumerates known operators. Ensure no unrecognized operator can slip through if validation changes in the future. Consider making the operator enumeration more robust or adding a default-case handling that throws an error if it’s invalid.


74-74: Excellent approach extending the existing Zod schema.
This helps ensure that any newly introduced parameters are strictly validated, preventing potential injection vectors.


167-167: Ensure the correct schema is applied.
Using extendedParamsSchema here is crucial to validate the dynamic path parameters properly. Good job referencing the extended schema.


171-171: Handle consistent error responses.
This function now merges original arguments and extended parameters before passing them into the query. Consider how errors or type mismatches are propagated if the extended schema fails validation.


253-253: Return type clarification.
Returning { whereClause: string; paramSchema: z.ZodType<any> } is explicit and helps with usage clarity. Just ensure the rest of the codebase references this updated return signature properly.


289-290: Keep an eye on potential naming collisions.
Because we’re extending the schema with new parameter names, verify that future parameters won’t inadvertently overwrite existing keys in logsTimeseriesParams.


292-292: Clear commentary enhances maintainability.
Documenting the path filter logic provides valuable context for other developers.


294-297: Consistently define param schemas and assigned values.
Similar to getLogs, each paramName is accurately mapped to its path value. This keeps the code consistent and safe from injection.


314-316: Good pattern for returning both whereClause and paramSchema.
This separation of concerns makes the function more testable and easier to maintain.


321-321: Leverage additionalConditions for more flexibility.
By passing extra conditions to getLogsTimeseriesWhereClause, you maintain a cleaner separation between standard filters and context-specific ones. Nicely done.


326-337: Consolidate parameter merging logic.
Merging path parameters into args is consistent with the approach in getLogs. This helps keep function usage uniform. Make sure any future expansions (e.g., new param types) follow the same pattern to avoid confusion.


342-344: Verify Zod schema usage in final query.
Specifying params: paramSchema and then calling with (parameters) is a robust pattern for preventing malformed inputs. Just ensure that any future expansions to the schema are also accounted for in parameters.

@chronark chronark added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit f45211d Feb 5, 2025
30 checks passed
@chronark chronark deleted the fix-sql-injection-vuln branch February 5, 2025 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants