Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: change to Apache 2.0 license and general cleanup #109

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

mhatzl
Copy link
Contributor

@mhatzl mhatzl commented Oct 2, 2023

List of issues that this PR closes

closes #108

Relevant decisions you made in this PR

Switched to Apache 2.0, because it is more precise than MIT.

Removed the build-step, because clippy already builds everything.

Removed issue templates, because templates should be taken from the .github repo in the Unimarkup organization.

@mhatzl mhatzl requested a review from nfejzic October 2, 2023 13:03
nfejzic
nfejzic previously approved these changes Oct 2, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@nfejzic nfejzic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! I have some minor suggestions, and there's one typo I think.

Might be nice to fix the typo, but otherwise you can merge with or without implementing the suggestions 👍🏻

.github/workflows/release-please.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
render/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mhatzl
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhatzl commented Oct 4, 2023

Thanks for your fast feedback.
I applied your changes, so should be ready to merge :)

@mhatzl mhatzl requested a review from nfejzic October 4, 2023 07:34
Comment on lines -13 to -20
build:
name: Run Build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v2
- name: Build
run: cargo build --verbose
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we should remove the Build step completely. Also, seems like the PR workflow status is stuck because it is missing 🤣. So yeah...

But either way, I think we should keep it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

clippy is already building the crate, and cargo test also builds the crate. Having build as additional job just increases the workflow duration without giving us any additional information.

@mhatzl mhatzl merged commit 10acfb0 into main Oct 5, 2023
3 checks passed
@mhatzl mhatzl deleted the cleanup branch October 5, 2023 06:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Use Clap::Parser::parse() instead of try_parse()
2 participants