Finish Identity View #30
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This has identified a number of UX problems, in that we can list identities for an organization, but then we need to get regions per identity (project) to correctly scope regions to translate from ID to name. I suspect that perhaps regions should be defined at the organization level - not the project, identities should have a regionID property much like clusters, then we can handle those in a geenric fashion and promote region scoped metadata to a top level core thing.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This has identified a number of UX problems, in that we can list identities for an organization, but then we need to get regions per identity (project) to correctly scope regions to translate from ID to name. I suspect that perhaps regions should be defined at the organization level - not the project, identities should have a regionID property much like clusters, then we can handle those in a geenric fashion and promote region scoped metadata to a top level core thing.