Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency depot/cli to v2.84.3 #10823

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

uniget-bot
Copy link

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
depot/cli patch 2.84.2 -> 2.84.3

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

depot/cli (depot/cli)

v2.84.3: Depot CLI 2.84.3

Compare Source

What's Changed


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

Copy link

@nicholasdille-bot nicholasdille-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approved because label type/renovate is present.

Copy link

🔍 Vulnerabilities of ghcr.io/uniget-org/tools/depot:2.84.3

📦 Image Reference ghcr.io/uniget-org/tools/depot:2.84.3
digestsha256:082cb6b9a4279b18151c1da7b89c8f9d6350d76a81f6f201d611db42f09874f2
vulnerabilitiescritical: 3 high: 9 medium: 13 low: 0 unspecified: 1
platformlinux/amd64
size13 MB
packages172
critical: 1 high: 6 medium: 9 low: 0 unspecified: 1stdlib 1.22.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/[email protected]

critical : CVE--2024--24790

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.4
Fixed version1.22.4
Description

The various Is methods (IsPrivate, IsLoopback, etc) did not work as expected for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, returning false for addresses which would return true in their traditional IPv4 forms.

high : CVE--2024--34158

Affected range<1.22.7
Fixed version1.22.7
Description

Calling Parse on a "// +build" build tag line with deeply nested expressions can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.

high : CVE--2024--34156

Affected range<1.22.7
Fixed version1.22.7
Description

Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635.

high : CVE--2024--24791

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.5
Fixed version1.22.5
Description

The net/http HTTP/1.1 client mishandled the case where a server responds to a request with an "Expect: 100-continue" header with a non-informational (200 or higher) status. This mishandling could leave a client connection in an invalid state, where the next request sent on the connection will fail.

An attacker sending a request to a net/http/httputil.ReverseProxy proxy can exploit this mishandling to cause a denial of service by sending "Expect: 100-continue" requests which elicit a non-informational response from the backend. Each such request leaves the proxy with an invalid connection, and causes one subsequent request using that connection to fail.

high : CVE--2024--24784

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.1
Fixed version1.22.1
Description

The ParseAddressList function incorrectly handles comments (text within parentheses) within display names. Since this is a misalignment with conforming address parsers, it can result in different trust decisions being made by programs using different parsers.

high : CVE--2023--45288

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.2
Fixed version1.22.2
Description

An attacker may cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data by sending an excessive number of CONTINUATION frames.

Maintaining HPACK state requires parsing and processing all HEADERS and CONTINUATION frames on a connection. When a request's headers exceed MaxHeaderBytes, no memory is allocated to store the excess headers, but they are still parsed.

This permits an attacker to cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data, all associated with a request which is going to be rejected. These headers can include Huffman-encoded data which is significantly more expensive for the receiver to decode than for an attacker to send.

The fix sets a limit on the amount of excess header frames we will process before closing a connection.

high : CVE--2022--30635

Affected range<1.22.7
Fixed version1.22.7
Description

Calling Decoder.Decode on a message which contains deeply nested structures can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion. This is a follow-up to CVE-2022-30635.

medium : CVE--2023--45290

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.1
Fixed version1.22.1
Description

When parsing a multipart form (either explicitly with Request.ParseMultipartForm or implicitly with Request.FormValue, Request.PostFormValue, or Request.FormFile), limits on the total size of the parsed form were not applied to the memory consumed while reading a single form line. This permits a maliciously crafted input containing very long lines to cause allocation of arbitrarily large amounts of memory, potentially leading to memory exhaustion.

With fix, the ParseMultipartForm function now correctly limits the maximum size of form lines.

medium : CVE--2024--45341

Affected range<1.22.11
Fixed version1.22.11
Description

A certificate with a URI which has a IPv6 address with a zone ID may incorrectly satisfy a URI name constraint that applies to the certificate chain.

Certificates containing URIs are not permitted in the web PKI, so this only affects users of private PKIs which make use of URIs.

medium : CVE--2024--45336

Affected range<1.22.11
Fixed version1.22.11
Description

The HTTP client drops sensitive headers after following a cross-domain redirect. For example, a request to a.com/ containing an Authorization header which is redirected to b.com/ will not send that header to b.com.

In the event that the client received a subsequent same-domain redirect, however, the sensitive headers would be restored. For example, a chain of redirects from a.com/, to b.com/1, and finally to b.com/2 would incorrectly send the Authorization header to b.com/2.

medium : CVE--2024--24788

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.3
Fixed version1.22.3
Description

A malformed DNS message in response to a query can cause the Lookup functions to get stuck in an infinite loop.

medium : CVE--2024--24783

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.1
Fixed version1.22.1
Description

Verifying a certificate chain which contains a certificate with an unknown public key algorithm will cause Certificate.Verify to panic.

This affects all crypto/tls clients, and servers that set Config.ClientAuth to VerifyClientCertIfGiven or RequireAndVerifyClientCert. The default behavior is for TLS servers to not verify client certificates.

medium : CVE--2024--24789

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.4
Fixed version1.22.4
Description

The archive/zip package's handling of certain types of invalid zip files differs from the behavior of most zip implementations. This misalignment could be exploited to create an zip file with contents that vary depending on the implementation reading the file. The archive/zip package now rejects files containing these errors.

medium : CVE--2024--34155

Affected range<1.22.7
Fixed version1.22.7
Description

Calling any of the Parse functions on Go source code which contains deeply nested literals can cause a panic due to stack exhaustion.

medium : CVE--2023--45289

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.1
Fixed version1.22.1
Description

When following an HTTP redirect to a domain which is not a subdomain match or exact match of the initial domain, an http.Client does not forward sensitive headers such as "Authorization" or "Cookie". For example, a redirect from foo.com to www.foo.com will forward the Authorization header, but a redirect to bar.com will not.

A maliciously crafted HTTP redirect could cause sensitive headers to be unexpectedly forwarded.

medium : CVE--2025--22866

Affected range<1.22.12
Fixed version1.22.12
Description

Due to the usage of a variable time instruction in the assembly implementation of an internal function, a small number of bits of secret scalars are leaked on the ppc64le architecture. Due to the way this function is used, we do not believe this leakage is enough to allow recovery of the private key when P-256 is used in any well known protocols.

unspecified : CVE--2024--24785

Affected range>=1.22.0-0
<1.22.1
Fixed version1.22.1
Description

If errors returned from MarshalJSON methods contain user controlled data, they may be used to break the contextual auto-escaping behavior of the html/template package, allowing for subsequent actions to inject unexpected content into templates.

critical: 1 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 golang.org/x/crypto 0.19.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

critical 9.1: CVE--2024--45337 Improper Authorization

Affected range<0.31.0
Fixed version0.31.0
CVSS Score9.1
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Applications and libraries which misuse the ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback callback may be susceptible to an authorization bypass.

The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions.

For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key.

Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/[email protected] enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth.

Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance.

high : CVE--2025--22869

Affected range<0.35.0
Fixed version0.35.0
Description

SSH servers which implement file transfer protocols are vulnerable to a denial of service attack from clients which complete the key exchange slowly, or not at all, causing pending content to be read into memory, but never transmitted.

critical: 1 high: 0 medium: 0 low: 0 github.com/docker/docker 24.0.9+incompatible (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/docker/[email protected]+incompatible

critical 9.4: CVE--2024--41110 Partial String Comparison

Affected range>=24.0.0
<25.0.6
Fixed version25.0.6
CVSS Score9.4
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in certain versions of Docker Engine, which could allow an attacker to bypass authorization plugins (AuthZ) under specific circumstances. The base likelihood of this being exploited is low. This advisory outlines the issue, identifies the affected versions, and provides remediation steps for impacted users.

Impact

Using a specially-crafted API request, an Engine API client could make the daemon forward the request or response to an authorization plugin without the body. In certain circumstances, the authorization plugin may allow a request which it would have otherwise denied if the body had been forwarded to it.

A security issue was discovered In 2018, where an attacker could bypass AuthZ plugins using a specially crafted API request. This could lead to unauthorized actions, including privilege escalation. Although this issue was fixed in Docker Engine v18.09.1 in January 2019, the fix was not carried forward to later major versions, resulting in a regression. Anyone who depends on authorization plugins that introspect the request and/or response body to make access control decisions is potentially impacted.

Docker EE v19.03.x and all versions of Mirantis Container Runtime are not vulnerable.

Vulnerability details

  • AuthZ bypass and privilege escalation: An attacker could exploit a bypass using an API request with Content-Length set to 0, causing the Docker daemon to forward the request without the body to the AuthZ plugin, which might approve the request incorrectly.
  • Initial fix: The issue was fixed in Docker Engine v18.09.1 January 2019..
  • Regression: The fix was not included in Docker Engine v19.03 or newer versions. This was identified in April 2024 and patches were released for the affected versions on July 23, 2024. The issue was assigned CVE-2024-41110.

Patches

  • docker-ce v27.1.1 containes patches to fix the vulnerability.
  • Patches have also been merged into the master, 19.0, 20.0, 23.0, 24.0, 25.0, 26.0, and 26.1 release branches.

Remediation steps

  • If you are running an affected version, update to the most recent patched version.
  • Mitigation if unable to update immediately:
    • Avoid using AuthZ plugins.
    • Restrict access to the Docker API to trusted parties, following the principle of least privilege.

References

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 1 low: 0 golang.org/x/net 0.21.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

high 8.7: CVE--2024--45338 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

Affected range<0.33.0
Fixed version0.33.0
CVSS Score8.7
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Description

An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service.

medium 5.3: CVE--2023--45288 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

Affected range<0.23.0
Fixed version0.23.0
CVSS Score5.3
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

An attacker may cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data by sending an excessive number of CONTINUATION frames. Maintaining HPACK state requires parsing and processing all HEADERS and CONTINUATION frames on a connection. When a request's headers exceed MaxHeaderBytes, no memory is allocated to store the excess headers, but they are still parsed. This permits an attacker to cause an HTTP/2 endpoint to read arbitrary amounts of header data, all associated with a request which is going to be rejected. These headers can include Huffman-encoded data which is significantly more expensive for the receiver to decode than for an attacker to send. The fix sets a limit on the amount of excess header frames we will process before closing a connection.

critical: 0 high: 1 medium: 0 low: 0 golang.org/x/oauth2 0.11.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/golang.org/x/[email protected]

high : CVE--2025--22868

Affected range<0.27.0
Fixed version0.27.0
Description

An attacker can pass a malicious malformed token which causes unexpected memory to be consumed during parsing.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 google.golang.org/protobuf 1.32.0 (golang)

pkg:golang/google.golang.org/[email protected]

medium 6.6: CVE--2024--24786 Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop')

Affected range<1.33.0
Fixed version1.33.0
CVSS Score6.6
CVSS VectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U
Description

The protojson.Unmarshal function can enter an infinite loop when unmarshaling certain forms of invalid JSON. This condition can occur when unmarshaling into a message which contains a google.protobuf.Any value, or when the UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown option is set.

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 github.com/containerd/containerd 1.6.20 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/containerd/[email protected]

medium : GHSA--7ww5--4wqc--m92c

Affected range<=1.6.25
Fixed version1.6.26
Description

/sys/devices/virtual/powercap accessible by default to containers

Intel's RAPL (Running Average Power Limit) feature, introduced by the Sandy Bridge microarchitecture, provides software insights into hardware energy consumption. To facilitate this, Intel introduced the powercap framework in Linux kernel 3.13, which reads values via relevant MSRs (model specific registers) and provides unprivileged userspace access via sysfs. As RAPL is an interface to access a hardware feature, it is only available when running on bare metal with the module compiled into the kernel.

By 2019, it was realized that in some cases unprivileged access to RAPL readings could be exploited as a power-based side-channel against security features including AES-NI (potentially inside a SGX enclave) and KASLR (kernel address space layout randomization). Also known as the PLATYPUS attack, Intel assigned CVE-2020-8694 and CVE-2020-8695, and AMD assigned CVE-2020-12912.

Several mitigations were applied; Intel reduced the sampling resolution via a microcode update, and the Linux kernel prevents access by non-root users since 5.10. However, this kernel-based mitigation does not apply to many container-based scenarios:

  • Unless using user namespaces, root inside a container has the same level of privilege as root outside the container, but with a slightly more narrow view of the system
  • sysfs is mounted inside containers read-only; however only read access is needed to carry out this attack on an unpatched CPU

While this is not a direct vulnerability in container runtimes, defense in depth and safe defaults are valuable and preferred, especially as this poses a risk to multi-tenant container environments. This is provided by masking /sys/devices/virtual/powercap in the default mount configuration, and adding an additional set of rules to deny it in the default AppArmor profile.

While sysfs is not the only way to read from the RAPL subsystem, other ways of accessing it require additional capabilities such as CAP_SYS_RAWIO which is not available to containers by default, or perf paranoia level less than 1, which is a non-default kernel tunable.

References

critical: 0 high: 0 medium: 1 low: 0 github.com/compose-spec/compose-go/v2 2.1.3 (golang)

pkg:golang/github.com/compose-spec/compose-go/[email protected]

medium 5.9: CVE--2024--10846 Improper Input Validation

Affected range>=2.1.0
<2.4.1
Fixed version2.4.1
CVSS Score5.9
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Impact

The compose-go library component in versions v2.10-v2.4.0 allows an authorized user who sends malicious YAML payloads to cause the compose-go to consume excessive amount of Memory and CPU cycles while parsing YAML, such as used by Docker Compose from versions v2.27.0 to v2.29.7 included

Patches

compose-go v2.24.1 fixed the issue

Workarounds

There isn't any known workaround.

References

Copy link

Attempting automerge. See https://github.com/uniget-org/tools/actions/runs/13802097282.

Copy link

PR is clean and can be merged. See https://github.com/uniget-org/tools/actions/runs/13802097282.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit bb25de1 into main Mar 12, 2025
10 of 11 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the renovate/depot-cli-2.84.x branch March 12, 2025 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants