Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix E2E Targeting with PDU after Cycles merge #4161

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 26, 2024

Conversation

pkujawa
Copy link
Contributor

@pkujawa pkujawa commented Aug 26, 2024

@pkujawa pkujawa added the backend Changes in BE code label Aug 26, 2024
@pkujawa pkujawa self-assigned this Aug 26, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.95%. Comparing base (a0a22c1) to head (65f1a50).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4161      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    82.42%   81.95%   -0.47%     
===========================================
  Files          417      417              
  Lines        33087    33087              
  Branches      5446     5446              
===========================================
- Hits         27271    27116     -155     
- Misses        4898     5044     +146     
- Partials       918      927       +9     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 52.94% <ø> (-3.34%) ⬇️
unittests 80.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@pkujawa pkujawa merged commit 0e67f76 into develop Aug 26, 2024
13 checks passed
@pkujawa pkujawa deleted the fix-e2e-for-pdu-targeting-after-merge branch August 26, 2024 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backend Changes in BE code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants