Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Master merge to develop #5843

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

Master merge to develop #5843

merged 33 commits into from
May 30, 2024

Conversation

lvs007
Copy link
Collaborator

@lvs007 lvs007 commented May 30, 2024

What does this PR do?

Why are these changes required?

This PR has been tested by:

  • Unit Tests
  • Manual Testing

Follow up

Extra details

zeusoo001 and others added 30 commits April 28, 2024 16:52
fix(net): solve the problem of concurrent access to fetchBlockInfo object
feat(version): update version to 4.7.5
feat(net): optimize block message processing logic
fix(net): solve the problem of concurrent access to syncBlockToFetch object
feat(net): remove redundant code
feat(consensus): optimize block production logic
feat(validate): validate account creation transaction size
# Conflicts:
#	actuator/src/main/java/org/tron/core/utils/ProposalUtil.java
#	chainbase/src/main/java/org/tron/core/store/DynamicPropertiesStore.java
#	common/src/main/java/org/tron/common/parameter/CommonParameter.java
#	framework/src/main/java/org/tron/core/Wallet.java
#	framework/src/main/java/org/tron/core/consensus/ProposalService.java
…_size

feat(validate): limit big transaction size
…emove_redundant_ret

# Conflicts:
#	common/src/main/java/org/tron/core/Constant.java
#	framework/src/main/java/org/tron/core/db/Manager.java
#	framework/src/test/java/org/tron/core/db/ManagerTest.java
feat(*): remove redundant ret for transaction
lvs007 and others added 3 commits May 30, 2024 19:57
…-44-g8720e06a6

update a new version. version name:GreatVoyage-v4.7.4-44-g8720e06a6,version code:18306
@lvs007 lvs007 merged commit afd15a7 into develop May 30, 2024
3 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants