Prevent findUnique from bringing down our database #1633
Conversation
|
|
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/resumeTaskDependency.server.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.45.0 ESLint couldn't find the config "custom" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct. The config "custom" was referenced from the config file in "/.eslintrc.js". If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/resumeTaskDependency.server.ts (1)
Line range hint
9-24: Consider adding error tracking for duplicate cases.To understand the impact and frequency of this issue, consider adding error tracking when duplicate records are detected.
const dependency = await this._prisma.taskRunDependency.findFirst({ where: { id: dependencyId }, + orderBy: { createdAt: 'asc' }, // Ensure consistent selection include: { taskRun: { include: { runtimeEnvironment: { include: { project: true, organization: true, }, }, }, }, dependentAttempt: { include: { taskRun: true, }, }, }, }); + + // Log if multiple records exist to track frequency of duplicates + const count = await this._prisma.taskRunDependency.count({ + where: { id: dependencyId }, + }); + if (count > 1) { + logger.error("Multiple taskRunDependency records found for the same ID", { + dependencyId, + count, + }); + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/resumeTaskDependency.server.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - pnpm)
- GitHub Check: e2e / 🧪 CLI v3 tests (windows-latest - npm)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apps/webapp/app/v3/services/resumeTaskDependency.server.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM! Defensive change to prevent database issues.The switch from
findUniquetofindFirstis a good defensive programming approach that can prevent database errors if duplicate records exist.
Line range hint
9-24: Verify data integrity and consider monitoring.While this change prevents database errors, it's important to:
- Verify if duplicate
taskRunDependencyrecords exist- Monitor for potential duplicates going forward
- Consider adding a cleanup task if duplicates are found
Let's check for potential duplicate records:
Summary by CodeRabbit