A more liberal markdownValid #31
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks good. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It appears Markdown uses the following regex to find the beginning of a tag:
This means, for example,
<=would not be a considered a tag.Currently, it is considered a tag. Curiously this can sometimes lead to the behavior witnessed in #29, where things kind-of look okay until you use a
'somewhere after your<. The'then has the syntax stackhtmlTag -> htmlStringand things go all wacky. (Well, things already were all wacky, since everything after the<=is considered internal to a tag.)This patch makes markdownValid more liberal, looking a bit more like Markdown's regex. It may fix some cases of #29.