forked from torvalds/linux
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ASoC: SOF: Intel: Add support for hardware mic privacy change reporting #5312
Open
ujfalusi
wants to merge
8
commits into
thesofproject:topic/sof-dev
Choose a base branch
from
ujfalusi:peter/sof/pr/ptl_sdw_mic_privacy_handling_01
base: topic/sof-dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
33d35c3
ASoC: SOF: Intel: mtl: Split up dsp_ops setup code
ujfalusi c64ab10
ASoC: SOF: Intel: lnl/ptl: Only set dsp_ops which differs from MTL
ujfalusi 3321dc0
ASoC: SOF: Intel: mtl: Stop exporting dsp_ops callback functions
ujfalusi c33ab5b
ASoC: SOF: Intel: Create ptl.c as placeholder for Panther Lake features
ujfalusi 7f00cf9
ASoC: SOF: ipc4: Add support for Intel HW managed mic privacy messaging
ujfalusi d5a1d5c
ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda-mlink: Add support for mic privacy in VS SHIM r…
ujfalusi ed886d3
ASoC: SOF: hda/shim: Add callbacks to handle mic privacy change for sdw
ujfalusi 85814f7
ASoC: SOF: Intel: ptl: Add support for mic privacy
ujfalusi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is very controversial.
In the case of DMICs, the mute can be completely handled by firmware since it also processes the GPIO that toggles the privacy.
In the case of SoundWire, the mute is expected to be handled in the external codec.
In other words, this IPC does not seem to have a purpose other than academic - and it's mind-blowing that such a split implementation for a 'secure' solution relies on an IPC from the host. Recompile your kernel and the privacy is crippled... That does not sound good, does it.