Rework project side configuration #64
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a transition from Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (2)
Line range hint
24-29: Update cache configuration for pnpm.The cache configuration is still using
package-lock.jsonfor key generation, but this file won't exist in a pnpm project. Update it to usepnpm-lock.yamlinstead.Apply this diff to fix the cache configuration:
- name: Setup Cache 🗂 uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: '**/node_modules' - key: ${{ runner.os }}-modules-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }} + key: ${{ runner.os }}-modules-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-modules-
37-37: Consider adding pnpm version setup.For better reproducibility, consider adding pnpm installation and version pinning before the install step.
Add these steps before the install command:
- uses: pnpm/action-setup@v2 with: version: 8docs/files/contributors.md (1)
11-11: LGTM! Consider adding pnpm installation instructions.The commands have been correctly updated to use pnpm instead of npm, which aligns with the project's transition to pnpm as the package manager.
Consider adding a prerequisite step about installing pnpm globally. For example:
1. Make sure you have `Node.js > v20` installed +1a. Install pnpm globally: `npm install -g pnpm` 2. Run `git clone https://github.com/themesberg/flowbite-angular.git`Also applies to: 14-14
package.json (1)
Line range hint
1-137: Consider adding pnpm-specific configurations.Since you're transitioning to pnpm, consider adding these configurations for better pnpm integration:
packageManagerfield to specify the pnpm version.npmrcfile reference for consistent configurationApply this diff to add pnpm-specific configurations:
{ "name": "flowbite-angular", "version": "0.0.3", + "packageManager": "[email protected]", "private": false,
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonpnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- .github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (1 hunks)
- .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- .prettierignore (1 hunks)
- apps/docs/project.json (0 hunks)
- docs/files/contributors.md (1 hunks)
- docs/files/technical-information/workflow-process/base/doc/build & test.md (1 hunks)
- docs/files/technical-information/workflow-process/base/lib/build & test.md (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- pnpm-workspace.yaml (1 hunks)
- vercel.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- apps/docs/project.json
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
- .husky/pre-commit
- .prettierignore
- docs/files/technical-information/workflow-process/base/doc/build & test.md
- docs/files/technical-information/workflow-process/base/lib/build & test.md
- pnpm-workspace.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
vercel.json (1)
6-6: LGTM!The build command has been correctly updated to use pnpm while maintaining the same build script target.
.github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (1)
37-49: Verify script commands exist in package.json.The command changes from npm to pnpm look correct. Let's verify that all the required scripts exist in the package.json file.
✅ Verification successful
Let me fix the regex syntax error and try again to verify the scripts in package.json.
All required scripts are present in package.json
The verification confirms that all the scripts used in the CI workflow exist in the root package.json:
"all:lint": "nx run-many --target lint --all""prettier": "nx format:check --base=HEAD""all:test": "nx run-many --target test --all""all:build": "nx run-many --target build --all"🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all required scripts exist in package.json # Expected: Should find all script names used in the workflow echo "Checking for required scripts in package.json files..." rg -l '"scripts":\s*{[^}]*"all:lint"' --type json rg -l '"scripts":\s*{[^}]*"prettier"' --type json rg -l '"scripts":\s*{[^}]*"all:test"' --type json rg -l '"scripts":\s*{[^}]*"all:build"' --type jsonLength of output: 832
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all required scripts exist in package.json # Expected: Should find all script names used in the workflow echo "Checking for required scripts in package.json files..." # First locate the package.json files echo "Package.json files found:" fd "package.json$" echo -e "\nChecking scripts in package.json files:" # Use simpler regex patterns with proper escaping rg '"all:lint"' --type json rg '"prettier"' --type json rg '"all:test"' --type json rg '"all:build"' --type jsonLength of output: 929
nx.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Package manager configuration updated correctly.The change from
npmtopnpmin the Nx configuration aligns with the PR objective of transitioning to pnpm as the project's package manager.package.json (1)
22-22: Verify the preinstall script's impact on existing workflows.The addition of
only-allow pnpmenforces pnpm usage, which is good for consistency. However, ensure all team members and CI/CD pipelines are updated accordingly.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the CI/CD configurations and workflow files.
This script will:
- List all workflow files
- Show their contents to verify package manager usage
- Check for package manager lock files
- Check nx configuration for package manager settings
This will give us a comprehensive view of the package manager configuration across the project.
Based on the workflow file contents, I can now generate the final response:
The preinstall script is properly aligned with the project's CI/CD configuration
The CI workflow (
ci-checks.yaml) already usespnpmcommands for all operations:
- Package installation:
pnpm i- Linting:
pnpm all:lint- Formatting:
pnpm prettier- Testing:
pnpm all:test- Building:
pnpm all:buildThe preinstall script's addition of
only-allow pnpmcomplements the existing setup by ensuring consistent package manager usage across both local development and CI environments.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if CI/CD configurations have been updated to use pnpm # Test: Search for any remaining npm commands in workflow files echo "Checking for npm commands in workflow files..." rg 'npm (install|run|ci|test|build)' .github/Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for workflow files and their content echo "=== Listing workflow files ===" fd . .github/workflows/ -e yml -e yaml echo -e "\n=== Checking workflow contents ===" fd . .github/workflows/ -e yml -e yaml -x cat {} echo -e "\n=== Checking for package manager related files ===" fd -g 'pnpm*' -g 'package-lock.json' -g 'yarn.lock' echo -e "\n=== Checking nx configuration ===" fd . -g 'nx.json' -x cat {}Length of output: 1870
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (1)
Line range hint
1-48: Consider adding caching for the pnpm store.While you've configured node_modules caching via setup-node, adding explicit pnpm store caching could further improve CI performance.
Add this step before the package installation:
- name: Get pnpm store directory id: pnpm-cache run: | echo "STORE_PATH=$(pnpm store path)" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT - uses: actions/cache@v4 name: Setup pnpm cache with: path: ${{ steps.pnpm-cache.outputs.STORE_PATH }} key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (2)
16-16: LGTM: Good practice to use the latest stable version.The upgrade to
actions/checkout@v4brings performance improvements and bug fixes.
20-30: Verify pnpm version compatibility with the project.The pnpm setup looks correct, but we should ensure version 9 is compatible with all project dependencies.
.github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml
Outdated
| run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Lint the code 🕵 | ||
| run: npm run all:lint | ||
| run: pnpm all:lint | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Run Prettier 💅 | ||
| run: npm run prettier | ||
| run: pnpm prettier | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Run unit tests 🔬 | ||
| run: npm run all:test | ||
| run: pnpm all:test | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Build code 🛠 | ||
| run: npm run all:build | ||
| run: pnpm all:build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding explicit error handling for pnpm commands.
While the migration to pnpm commands is correct, consider adding error handling flags for better CI feedback:
- run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile
+ run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile --strict-peer-dependencies
- run: pnpm all:lint
+ run: pnpm all:lint || exit 1
- run: pnpm all:test
+ run: pnpm all:test -- --ci --verboseThis will:
- Ensure strict peer dependency checks during installation
- Fail fast on lint errors
- Provide more detailed test output in CI
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile | |
| - name: Lint the code 🕵 | |
| run: npm run all:lint | |
| run: pnpm all:lint | |
| - name: Run Prettier 💅 | |
| run: npm run prettier | |
| run: pnpm prettier | |
| - name: Run unit tests 🔬 | |
| run: npm run all:test | |
| run: pnpm all:test | |
| - name: Build code 🛠 | |
| run: npm run all:build | |
| run: pnpm all:build | |
| run: pnpm i --frozen-lockfile --strict-peer-dependencies | |
| - name: Lint the code 🕵 | |
| run: pnpm all:lint || exit 1 | |
| - name: Run Prettier 💅 | |
| run: pnpm prettier | |
| - name: Run unit tests 🔬 | |
| run: pnpm all:test -- --ci --verbose | |
| - name: Build code 🛠 | |
| run: pnpm all:build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/release.yml (1)
36-36: Document the release command flags.The release command uses several flags (
--ci,--verbose,--skip-nx-cache). Consider adding inline comments or documentation explaining their purpose and when they might need to be modified.- run: pnpm lib:release -- --ci --verbose --skip-nx-cache + # --ci: Ensures CI mode (no interactive prompts) + # --verbose: Detailed logging for debugging + # --skip-nx-cache: Forces fresh execution + run: pnpm lib:release -- --ci --verbose --skip-nx-cache.github/actions/setup/action.yml (3)
1-23: Update documentation to match implementation detailsThere are a few inconsistencies in the documentation:
- The header mentions "pnpm 7/8+" but the action uses "latest-9"
- The usage example shows
./.github/actions/pnpm-installbut the actual path would be./.github/actions/setupApply this diff to fix the documentation:
-# "pnpm install" composite action for pnpm 7/8+ # +# "pnpm install" composite action for pnpm 9+ # #--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------# # Requirement: @setup/node should be run before # # # # Usage in workflows steps: # # # # - name: 📥 Monorepo install # -# uses: ./.github/actions/pnpm-install # +# uses: ./.github/actions/setup #
73-79: Remove commented code about store pruningThe commented section about store pruning adds noise to the codebase. If this is a future consideration, it should be tracked in an issue instead.
Remove these commented lines and create a GitHub issue to track the future implementation of store pruning if needed.
88-89: Document Nx integration purposeThe Nx SHA derivation step lacks context about its purpose and when it's needed.
Add a comment explaining why this step is necessary and when it should be used:
- name: Derive appropriate SHAs for base and head for `nx affected` commands + # Required for determining which projects have been affected by changes when using Nx + # This step helps optimize the CI pipeline by only running tasks on affected projects uses: nrwl/nx-set-shas@v2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- .github/actions/setup/action.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/cache_cleanup.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml (0 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
- .nxreleaserc.json (1 hunks)
- libs/flowbite-angular/project.json (1 hunks)
- nx.json (1 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/ci-checks.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .nxreleaserc.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- nx.json
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/cache_cleanup.yml
18-18: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:14:29: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/cache_cleanup.yml
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
.github/workflows/release.yml (3)
17-20: LGTM! Appropriate permissions are set.The workflow follows the principle of least privilege by explicitly declaring only the required permissions:
contents: writefor creating releasesissues: writefor linking issuespull-requests: writefor linking PRs
35-39: Consider adding environment protection rules for secrets.The workflow uses sensitive secrets (
GITHUB_TOKENandNPM_TOKEN). Consider adding environment protection rules to restrict which branches can access these secrets.#!/bin/bash # Check if environments are configured with protection rules gh api repos/:owner/:repo/environments 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: No environment protection rules found"Additionally, consider these security enhancements:
- Add
NODE_ENV=productionto prevent development dependencies- Consider adding checksum verification for the release artifacts
32-34: Verify the custom setup action implementation.The workflow uses a local custom action
./.github/actions/setup. Ensure this action is properly implemented and maintained.#!/bin/bash # Check if the setup action exists and contains the necessary files if [ -f ".github/actions/setup/action.yml" ]; then echo "Setup action found. Checking contents..." cat ".github/actions/setup/action.yml" else echo "Warning: Setup action not found at .github/actions/setup/action.yml" fi.github/workflows/cache_cleanup.yml (2)
1-9: LGTM! Well-structured workflow configuration.The workflow triggers and metadata are appropriately configured for cache cleanup purposes.
10-16: LGTM! Job configuration is correct.The job uses the latest Ubuntu runner and checkout action version.
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
10-29: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionOptimize lint job configuration
The lint job configuration can be improved in several ways:
- Remove unnecessary git history fetch
- Add caching for faster workflow execution
- Verify the custom setup action implementation
lint: name: Lint the code 🕵 runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Check out the code 🗄 uses: actions/checkout@v4 - with: - fetch-depth: 0 - name: Setup NodeJS 💿 uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 20 + cache: 'pnpm' - name: Monorepo install uses: ./.github/actions/setupLet's verify the custom setup action implementation:
libs/flowbite-angular/project.json (3)
56-58: Ensure build output path is consistent.The
outputPathmatches the build target's output directory, which is good. However, let's verify that this path is consistently used across the workspace configuration.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of output paths across workspace # Test: Search for any references to the dist directory rg "dist/libs/flowbite-angular" -g "*.{json,js,ts,yml,yaml}" -l
58-59: Review tag format for version consistency.The tag format
flowbite-angular@v${version}follows a good convention. However, let's verify this aligns with existing tags in the repository.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check existing tag format # Test: List existing tags matching the flowbite-angular pattern git tag | grep -E "flowbite-angular@v[0-9]"
36-60: Verify semantic-release configuration completeness.The semantic-release configuration looks well-structured, but there are a few considerations:
- The configuration includes both GitHub and npm publishing, but we should verify the presence of required authentication tokens in the CI environment.
- The branch configuration follows semantic-release best practices with support for maintenance, pre-release, and alpha/beta releases.
✅ Verification successful
Semantic-release configuration is properly set up and integrated
The verification confirms that the semantic-release configuration is complete and well-integrated:
- Required dependency
@theunderscorer/nx-semantic-releaseis present in package.json- GitHub Actions workflow "Release" is configured with:
- Correct branch triggers matching the semantic-release config
- Required
GH_TOKENandNPM_TOKENsecrets- Proper execution command
pnpm lib:release- Build target exists and is correctly referenced in semantic-release config
- No conflicting release configurations found in the repository
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of required semantic-release dependencies and configurations # Test 1: Check if @theunderscorer/nx-semantic-release is in dependencies rg -l "@theunderscorer/nx-semantic-release" "package.json" # Test 2: Check for semantic-release config file that might override these settings fd -g "*release*config*.{js,json,yaml,yml}" # Test 3: Check for GitHub Actions workflow using this target fd -g "*.{yml,yaml}" .github/workflows/ -x rg -l "flowbite-angular:semantic-release"Length of output: 529
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to verify the configuration # Check package.json for semantic-release related dependencies echo "=== Checking package.json for dependencies ===" cat package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "semantic-release" # Check for GitHub workflow files echo -e "\n=== Checking GitHub workflow files ===" fd -g "*.yml" .github/workflows/ -x cat {} # Check for any existing semantic-release configuration echo -e "\n=== Checking for release configuration files ===" find . -type f -name ".releaserc*" find . -type f -name "release.config.*" # Check if the build target exists echo -e "\n=== Checking build target configuration ===" cat libs/flowbite-angular/project.json | grep -A 10 '"build":'Length of output: 5203
| name: Release | ||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
| push: | ||
| branches: | ||
| - main | ||
| - next | ||
| - next-major | ||
| - alpha | ||
| - beta | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Enable branch protection rules for release branches
The verification confirms that none of the branches, including the release-targeted branches (main, next, next-major, etc.), have protection rules enabled. This poses a security risk for the release workflow as:
- The default branch (main) is unprotected
- All branches can be directly pushed to without reviews
- Squash and merge commits are allowed, but without required reviews
To prevent unauthorized releases, you should:
- Enable branch protection rules for all release branches
- Require pull request reviews before merging
- Enable status checks to pass before merging
- Consider restricting who can push to release branches
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider adding branch protection rules.
The workflow triggers on pushes to sensitive branches (main, next, next-major, etc.). To prevent unauthorized releases, ensure these branches have appropriate protection rules.
Let me gather more information about the repository's branch protection settings.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if branch protection rules exist for release branches
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/branches/main/protection 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: main branch is not protected"
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/branches/next/protection 2>/dev/null || echo "Warning: next branch is not protected"
Length of output: 4076
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check repository settings and branch protection patterns
gh api repos/:owner/:repo | jq -r '.default_branch, .allow_squash_merge, .allow_merge_commit, .allow_rebase_merge'
# List all branch protection rules
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/branches | jq -r '.[].protected'
# Check workflow permissions
gh api repos/:owner/:repo/actions/permissions | jq -r '.default_workflow_permissions'
Length of output: 367
| - name: Cleanup | ||
| run: | | ||
| gh extension install actions/gh-actions-cache | ||
|
|
||
| REPO=${{ github.repository }} | ||
| BRANCH="refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge" | ||
|
|
||
| echo "Fetching list of cache key" | ||
| cacheKeysForPR=$(gh actions-cache list -R $REPO -B $BRANCH | cut -f 1 | grep pnpm) | ||
|
|
||
| ## Setting this to not fail the workflow while deleting cache keys. | ||
| set +e | ||
| echo "Deleting caches..." | ||
| for cacheKey in $cacheKeysForPR | ||
| do | ||
| gh actions-cache delete $cacheKey -R $REPO -B $BRANCH --confirm | ||
| done | ||
| echo "Done" | ||
| env: | ||
| GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Several improvements needed in the cleanup script.
While the basic functionality is correct, there are some improvements that could make the script more robust:
- Quote variables to prevent word splitting
- Add error handling for grep
- Improve logging of deleted cache keys
- Remove trailing whitespace
- Add existence check for caches
Here's the improved version:
- name: Cleanup
run: |
gh extension install actions/gh-actions-cache
- REPO=${{ github.repository }}
- BRANCH="refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge"
+ REPO="${{ github.repository }}"
+ BRANCH="refs/pull/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/merge"
echo "Fetching list of cache key"
- cacheKeysForPR=$(gh actions-cache list -R $REPO -B $BRANCH | cut -f 1 | grep pnpm)
+ cacheKeysForPR=$(gh actions-cache list -R "$REPO" -B "$BRANCH" | cut -f 1 | grep -F "pnpm" || true)
+ if [ -z "$cacheKeysForPR" ]; then
+ echo "No caches found for this PR"
+ exit 0
+ fi
- ## Setting this to not fail the workflow while deleting cache keys.
+ # Setting this to not fail the workflow while deleting cache keys
set +e
echo "Deleting caches..."
- for cacheKey in $cacheKeysForPR
+ for cacheKey in $cacheKeysForPR
do
- gh actions-cache delete $cacheKey -R $REPO -B $BRANCH --confirm
+ echo "Deleting cache key: $cacheKey"
+ gh actions-cache delete "$cacheKey" -R "$REPO" -B "$BRANCH" --confirm
done
echo "Done"The improvements:
- Added quotes around variables to prevent word splitting
- Added
-Fto grep for literal string matching - Added
|| trueto prevent grep from failing when no matches found - Added check for empty cache list
- Improved logging to show which cache keys are being deleted
- Fixed trailing whitespace in comment
- Made comment style consistent
Consider adding a timeout to the job to prevent long-running cleanups:
jobs:
cleanup:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
timeout-minutes: 10🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
18-18: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:14:29: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
🪛 yamllint
[error] 27-27: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
| on: | ||
| workflow_dispatch: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
|
|
||
| concurrency: ${{ github.ref }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance workflow trigger configuration and permissions
Consider the following improvements for better workflow control:
- Add branch filters to the pull_request trigger to limit unnecessary workflow runs
- Add
cancel-in-progress: trueto the concurrency setting - Explicitly declare required permissions
Apply these changes to improve the workflow configuration:
on:
workflow_dispatch:
pull_request:
+ branches:
+ - main
+ - develop
+
+permissions:
+ contents: read
+ pull-requests: read
-concurrency: ${{ github.ref }}
+concurrency:
+ group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }}
+ cancel-in-progress: true📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| on: | |
| workflow_dispatch: | |
| pull_request: | |
| concurrency: ${{ github.ref }} | |
| on: | |
| workflow_dispatch: | |
| pull_request: | |
| branches: | |
| - main | |
| - develop | |
| permissions: | |
| contents: read | |
| pull-requests: read | |
| concurrency: | |
| group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }} | |
| cancel-in-progress: true |
| build: | ||
| name: Build code 🛠 | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Check out the code 🗄 | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| fetch-depth: 0 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Setup NodeJS 💿 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: 20 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Monorepo install | ||
| uses: ./.github/actions/setup | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Build code 🛠 | ||
| run: pnpm all:build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize build job configuration and add dependencies
The build job should:
- Depend on successful lint and test jobs
- Upload build artifacts
- Use dependency caching
Apply these changes to improve the build job:
build:
name: Build code 🛠
+ needs: [lint, test]
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Check out the code 🗄
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- with:
- fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup NodeJS 💿
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: 20
+ cache: 'pnpm'
- name: Monorepo install
uses: ./.github/actions/setup
- name: Build code 🛠
run: pnpm all:build
+
+ - name: Upload build artifacts
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+ with:
+ name: build-artifacts
+ path: dist/Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| test: | ||
| name: Run unit tests 🔬 | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
| steps: | ||
| - name: Check out the code 🗄 | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| fetch-depth: 0 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Setup NodeJS 💿 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: 20 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Monorepo install | ||
| uses: ./.github/actions/setup | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Run unit tests 🔬 | ||
| run: pnpm all:test -- --ci --verbose | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance test job with artifacts and coverage reporting
Consider improving the test job configuration:
- Add test results and coverage artifacts
- Remove unnecessary git history fetch
- Add caching for dependencies
Apply these changes to enhance the test job:
test:
name: Run unit tests 🔬
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Check out the code 🗄
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- with:
- fetch-depth: 0
- name: Setup NodeJS 💿
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: 20
+ cache: 'pnpm'
- name: Monorepo install
uses: ./.github/actions/setup
- name: Run unit tests 🔬
- run: pnpm all:test -- --ci --verbose
+ run: pnpm all:test -- --ci --verbose --coverage
+ - name: Upload test results
+ if: always()
+ uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
+ with:
+ name: test-results
+ path: |
+ coverage/
+ test-results/Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| "github": true, | ||
| "npm": true, | ||
| "changelog": true, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding additional semantic-release plugins.
While the basic configuration with GitHub, npm, and changelog is good, consider adding these commonly used plugins for a more robust release process:
@semantic-release/commit-analyzer: For conventional commits parsing@semantic-release/release-notes-generator: For structured release notes@semantic-release/git: For version bumping in package.json
"options": {
"github": true,
"npm": true,
"changelog": true,
+ "plugins": [
+ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer",
+ "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator",
+ "@semantic-release/npm",
+ "@semantic-release/github",
+ "@semantic-release/git"
+ ],Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
| inputs: | ||
| enable-corepack: | ||
| description: 'Enable corepack' | ||
| required: false | ||
| default: 'false' | ||
| cwd: | ||
| description: "Changes node's process.cwd() if the project is not located on the root. Default to process.cwd()" | ||
| required: false | ||
| default: '.' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance input parameters documentation and validation
Consider the following improvements:
- Clarify whether
cwdaccepts absolute paths or must be relative to the workspace - Add input validation for the
enable-corepackboolean value
Apply this diff to enhance the input parameters:
inputs:
enable-corepack:
description: 'Enable corepack'
required: false
default: 'false'
+ type: boolean
cwd:
- description: "Changes node's process.cwd() if the project is not located on the root. Default to process.cwd()"
+ description: "Project directory relative to workspace root. Default: '.'"
required: false
default: '.'📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| inputs: | |
| enable-corepack: | |
| description: 'Enable corepack' | |
| required: false | |
| default: 'false' | |
| cwd: | |
| description: "Changes node's process.cwd() if the project is not located on the root. Default to process.cwd()" | |
| required: false | |
| default: '.' | |
| inputs: | |
| enable-corepack: | |
| description: 'Enable corepack' | |
| required: false | |
| default: 'false' | |
| type: boolean | |
| cwd: | |
| description: "Project directory relative to workspace root. Default: '.'" | |
| required: false | |
| default: '.' |
| - name: Install dependencies | ||
| shell: bash | ||
| working-directory: ${{ inputs.cwd }} | ||
| run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline | ||
| env: | ||
| # Other environment variables | ||
| HUSKY: '0' # By default do not run HUSKY install | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and environment variables documentation
The installation step could benefit from:
- Better error handling with continue-on-error or explicit error messages
- Clear documentation for all environment variables (currently only HUSKY is documented)
Apply this diff to improve the installation step:
- name: Install dependencies
shell: bash
working-directory: ${{ inputs.cwd }}
- run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline
+ run: |
+ echo "Installing dependencies in ${{ inputs.cwd }}..."
+ if ! pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline; then
+ echo "::error::Failed to install dependencies. Check the lockfile and try again."
+ exit 1
+ fi
env:
- # Other environment variables
+ # Prevent Husky installation during CI
HUSKY: '0' # By default do not run HUSKY install
+ # Add other environment variables here with clear documentation📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| shell: bash | |
| working-directory: ${{ inputs.cwd }} | |
| run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline | |
| env: | |
| # Other environment variables | |
| HUSKY: '0' # By default do not run HUSKY install | |
| - name: Install dependencies | |
| shell: bash | |
| working-directory: ${{ inputs.cwd }} | |
| run: | | |
| echo "Installing dependencies in ${{ inputs.cwd }}..." | |
| if ! pnpm install --frozen-lockfile --prefer-offline; then | |
| echo "::error::Failed to install dependencies. Check the lockfile and try again." | |
| exit 1 | |
| fi | |
| env: | |
| # Prevent Husky installation during CI | |
| HUSKY: '0' # By default do not run HUSKY install | |
| # Add other environment variables here with clear documentation |
| - uses: actions/cache@v4 | ||
| name: Setup pnpm cache | ||
| with: | ||
| path: ${{ steps.pnpm-config.outputs.STORE_PATH }} | ||
| key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-cache-${{ steps.cache-rotation.outputs.YEAR_MONTH }}-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }} | ||
| restore-keys: | | ||
| ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-cache-${{ steps.cache-rotation.outputs.YEAR_MONTH }}- | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve cache key strategy
The current cache key strategy might lead to cache misses when dependencies haven't changed. Consider including the Node.js version in the cache key to prevent issues with different Node.js versions.
Apply this diff to enhance cache keys:
- uses: actions/cache@v4
name: Setup pnpm cache
with:
path: ${{ steps.pnpm-config.outputs.STORE_PATH }}
- key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-cache-${{ steps.cache-rotation.outputs.YEAR_MONTH }}-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
+ key: ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-cache-${{ steps.cache-rotation.outputs.YEAR_MONTH }}-node-${{ matrix.node-version }}-${{ hashFiles('**/pnpm-lock.yaml') }}
restore-keys: |
- ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-cache-${{ steps.cache-rotation.outputs.YEAR_MONTH }}-
+ ${{ runner.os }}-pnpm-store-cache-${{ steps.cache-rotation.outputs.YEAR_MONTH }}-node-${{ matrix.node-version }}-Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0-beta.1 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
pnpmas the package manager.appsandlibs.Bug Fixes
npmtopnpm.Documentation
npmcommands withpnpmequivalents.Chores
npmtopnpm.pnpm.